Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 35 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1701 MARIN 14-Black 1898 46-28 62% 14 CA
1702 MAVS 816 14-National 1898 32-15 68% 14 KS
1703 Miami Hype 17-Prime2 1897 53-33 62% 17 FL
1704 Chicago Elite 16 Elite 1897 42-27 61% 16 IL
1705 PowerPlex 16-Chapman 1897 43-15 74% 16 IA
1706 STVA 14-1 eddie 1897 13-7 65% 14 TX
1707 MADFROG 14-N black 1897 39-30 57% 14 TX
1708 Vital 18-1 gold 1897 24-22 52% 18 MN
1709 South County 18-Josh/kayli 1897 23-10 70% 18 UT
1710 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 17-N justin 1897 35-17 67% 17 NJ
1711 Mobile Storm 18 National 1897 27-5 84% 18 AL
1712 DVC 12-Elite 1896 28-3 90% 12 OH
1713 Six Pack 18 1896 38-13 75% 18 IA
1714 OMNI 17 National 1896 32-45 42% 17 CA
1715 Mabel-Canton Jrs 12 1896 30-1 97% 12 MN
1716 Big Sky 18-1 1896 8-6 57% 18 MT
1717 Munciana 17 Aztecs 1896 40-34 54% 17 IN
1718 L2 14-1 1895 41-25 62% 14 MI
1719 BCS Skyline H 18 Royal 1895 29-19 60% 18 TX
1720 Absolute 13-Black 1895 32-41 44% 13 CA
1721 WAVE 16-Nancy 1895 32-28 53% 16 CA
1722 Texas Fury 14 Legacy 1895 46-17 72% 14 TX
1723 Kairos 15 Gamma 1895 55-12 82% 15 SD
1724 Madtown 18-1 national 1895 30-21 59% 18 WI
1725 TX432 17-Black 1895 32-22 59% 17 TX
1726 SG Elite 15 Excel 1895 54-15 78% 15 CA
1727 City 15 Gold 1895 36-20 64% 15 CA
1728 Club One AZ 18-Platinum 1895 30-29 51% 18 AZ
1729 Heat Volleyball Academy 12-Red 1894 52-15 78% 12 TX
1730 Munciana Indy 14 Otters 1894 32-33 49% 14 IN
1731 Boltz 16-Desert aces 1894 61-33 65% 16 AZ
1732 RVC 18 National 1894 29-13 69% 18 VA
1733 Angelo Rise 13-1 1894 38-10 79% 13 TX
1734 Vibe 14-Black 1894 28-21 57% 14 CA
1735 Elevation 16-Bouyer 1894 39-14 74% 16 OH
1736 Academy 17 Diamond 1894 19-38 33% 17 NC
1737 Actyve 17-Navy 1894 23-39 37% 17 CA
1738 CoJrs 17-Tara/amy 1894 50-27 65% 17 CO
1739 Club Legacy 17-Alpha 1893 23-14 62% 17 NE
1740 Miami Wave 13-Aqua 1893 50-28 64% 13 FL
1741 VolleyFX 18 Magic 1893 44-14 75% 18 NY
1742 Actyve 14-Navy 1893 26-24 52% 14 CA
1743 915 14-Hill 1893 52-22 68% 14 TX
1744 West Florida Volleyball Club 14-King 1893 45-17 73% 14 AL
1745 Aspire NW 15-1 vancouver 1893 16-7 70% 15 WA
1746 St. Pete 18-Teal 1893 49-10 83% 18 FL
1747 Ultimate G16 Gold 1893 46-19 71% 16 IL
1748 Tri-State Elite 15-White 1893 34-28 55% 15 KY
1749 Monon 14-2e blast 1892 54-31 64% 14 IN
1750 BVC 15-National drennan 1892 45-15 75% 15 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.