Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 35 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1701 TW Skyline 15-Royal 1896 40-18 69% 15 TX
1702 Viper 18-1 kurstan/natalie 1896 11-5 69% 18 CA
1703 STVA 14-1 eddie 1896 13-7 65% 14 TX
1704 AZ REV 16 Premier 1895 31-41 43% 16 AZ
1705 Wisconsin Elite 14-Elite 1895 48-21 70% 14 WI
1706 OT 18-J stephen 1895 20-29 41% 18 FL
1707 Ultimate G16 Gold 1895 46-19 71% 16 IL
1708 TX432 17-Black 1895 32-22 59% 17 TX
1709 VolleyFX 18 Magic 1895 44-14 75% 18 NY
1710 Vital 18-1 gold 1895 24-22 52% 18 MN
1711 915 14-Hill 1895 52-22 68% 14 TX
1712 EAVC 16-1 1895 20-17 54% 16 UT
1713 RRHEAT 18-1 annie 1895 10-5 67% 18 UT
1714 VIP ACADEMY 16-1 1895 12-3 80% 16 TX
1715 MADFROG 14-N black 1895 39-30 57% 14 TX
1716 Pgh Elite 17-Elite 1895 33-30 52% 17 PA
1717 Crossfire 16-1 (NO) 1894 12-6 67% 16
1718 Miami Hype 17-Prime2 1894 53-33 62% 17 FL
1719 NKYVC 15-2 tide 1894 46-23 67% 15 KY
1720 OMNI 17 National 1894 32-45 42% 17 CA
1721 1st Alliance 17 Onyx 1894 45-12 79% 17 IL
1722 Texas Fury 14 Legacy 1894 46-17 72% 14 TX
1723 WD Nation 18-Blue 1894 33-10 77% 18 LA
1724 Elevate Athletics 18-Nike zach 1894 23-5 82% 18 UT
1725 Vegas Aces 17-Ren 1894 29-35 45% 17 NV
1726 FW Fire 14-Purple 1894 26-5 84% 14 TX
1727 L2 14-1 1894 41-25 62% 14 MI
1728 AP 13-Baden 1894 41-25 62% 13 TX
1729 DVC 12-Elite 1894 28-3 90% 12 OH
1730 Club V 15-Prodigy drew 1894 35-23 60% 15 UT
1731 Northern Lights 15-B 1894 50-18 74% 15 MN
1732 Boltz 16-Desert aces 1893 61-33 65% 16 AZ
1733 Club One AZ 18-Platinum 1893 30-29 51% 18 AZ
1734 FORZA1 NORTH 15 ONE 1893 33-25 57% 15 CA
1735 Madtown 18-1 national 1893 30-21 59% 18 WI
1736 WF Waves 14-King 1893 45-17 73% 14 FL
1737 VIPER 14 Elite 1893 49-15 77% 14 CA
1738 Prodigy 15-1 premier 1893 50-14 78% 15 NY
1739 3DGE 16-1 gold 1893 21-26 45% 16 PA
1740 Miami Wave 13-Aqua 1893 50-28 64% 13 FL
1741 Carolina Rogue 17-Black 1893 19-33 37% 17 SC
1742 JERSEY JRS 18-National 1893 6-10 38% 18 NJ
1743 Cajun Elite 17 Adam 1892 37-13 74% 17 LA
1744 KC Power 15-3 1892 37-14 73% 15 KS
1745 ARVC 14-Orange 1892 46-9 84% 14 NC
1746 USA South 15-Premier purple 1892 24-27 47% 15 FL
1747 OVBC 12-Purple 1892 31-3 91% 12 WI
1748 OT 12-T liz 1892 45-23 66% 12 FL
1749 VOLT 14-1 1892 49-24 67% 14 ND
1750 Apex 17-1 1892 25-22 53% 17 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.