Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 34 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1651 FIVA 13-Avio 1903 54-9 86% 13 FL
1652 BORINQUEN COQUI 18-F guille 1903 5-2 71% 18 PR
1653 Club Legacy 17-Alpha 1903 23-14 62% 17 NE
1654 SA Magic 14-Elite 1903 47-23 65% 14 TX
1655 City 13 Gold 1902 27-27 50% 13 CA
1656 MAVS 816 15-National 1902 33-21 61% 15 KS
1657 MVSA 14 Dynamite 1902 69-6 91% 14 MD
1658 Core STL 14-Navy 1902 38-16 69% 14 MO
1659 Sunshine 14-Westside 1902 32-29 52% 14 CA
1660 Milwaukee Jr's 17-1 1901 57-34 63% 17 WI
1661 New Age 15-Select 1901 41-41 50% 15 TX
1662 PowerPlex 16-Chapman 1901 43-15 74% 16 IA
1663 Aleta 15-1 1901 28-10 74% 15 OH
1664 Arete 11-Navy telos 1901 44-15 71% 11 TX
1665 808AC 14-Sheri 1901 19-11 63% 14 HI
1666 H. Skyline TW 16-1 1901 4-4 50% 16
1667 MDJRS 13 Elite 1900 51-15 75% 13 MD
1668 Elevation 12-Peak 1900 51-22 70% 12 CO
1669 MiElite 14 Mizuno 1900 35-38 48% 14 MI
1670 Amarillo Xtreme 12-Rivals 1900 34-10 77% 12 TX
1671 BVA 15-N alyssa 1900 36-29 55% 15 CA
1672 EMV 13-Black mcneider 1900 40-13 71% 13 TX
1673 BCS Skyline H 13-Royal 1899 39-23 63% 13 TX
1674 MiElite 13 Mizuno 1899 31-34 48% 13 MI
1675 1st Alliance 18-Black 1899 30-4 88% 18 IL
1676 Tri-State Elite 17-White 1899 37-26 59% 17 OH
1677 Advantage 17-Teal 1899 40-27 60% 17 NC
1678 Vital 16-1 gold 1899 35-30 54% 16 MN
1679 Princeton 17-Black 1899 30-23 57% 17 NJ
1680 WVBA 18-Adidas 1899 30-17 64% 18 WA
1681 Elevation 15-Downs 1899 38-26 59% 15 OH
1682 St Joe Storm 16-1 1898 38-9 81% 16
1683 Balboa Bay 15-Blue 1898 37-15 71% 15 CA
1684 MAVS 816 14-National 1898 32-15 68% 14 KS
1685 Surfside 15-Pv elite 1898 41-21 66% 15 CA
1686 WD Nation 15-Blue 1898 45-9 83% 15 LA
1687 805 Elite 16-National 1898 44-17 72% 16 CA
1688 CYVBC Surge 17-Black 1898 34-17 67% 17 OH
1689 Elevate 16-Cate 1898 42-11 79% 16 TX
1690 WSRVC 14-Lovato 1897 40-13 75% 14
1691 AP 16 Baden 1897 43-15 74% 16 TX
1692 NKYVC 14-2 tide 1897 35-24 59% 14 KY
1693 Top Flight 18 Elite 1897 36-12 75% 18 IL
1694 Laredo Premier 11-Force 1897 32-10 76% 11 TX
1695 MichioChicago 14-Bluesmoke 1897 25-21 54% 14 IL
1696 WF Waves 17-Brandy 1897 42-17 71% 17 FL
1697 Angelo Rise 13-1 1896 38-10 79% 13 TX
1698 EXCEL 15-National white 1896 30-25 52% 15 TX
1699 NHouston Elite 15-Premier 1896 39-13 75% 15 TX
1700 OT 16-T justin 1896 40-24 63% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.