Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 34 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1651 Alliance 15-Molten 1905 33-23 59% 15 TN
1652 Landshark 13-Black 1905 30-6 83% 13 KS
1653 COAST 14-Andy 1905 5-3 63% 14 CA
1654 Vibe 14-1 1905 14-1 93% 14 CA
1655 Tri-State Elite 17-White 1904 37-26 59% 17 KY
1656 MAVS KC 13 National 1904 26-14 65% 13 KS
1657 Tsunami 13-1e jeff 1904 44-16 73% 13 GA
1658 BVA 15-N alyssa 1904 36-29 55% 15 FL
1659 NKYVC 14-2 tide 1904 35-24 59% 14 KY
1660 OT 16-T justin 1904 40-24 63% 16 FL
1661 Jupiter Elite 17-E 1904 34-35 49% 17 FL
1662 SA Magic 14-Elite 1904 47-23 65% 14 TX
1663 Arete 11-Navy telos 1903 44-15 71% 11 TX
1664 Mid-Mich ACES 17 National 1903 46-14 77% 17 MI
1665 WPVC 13-Armour black 1903 40-37 52% 13 FL
1666 Michigan Volleyball Academy 15 MVA - Rise Academy 51 1903 28-21 57% 15 MI
1667 A5 15-Myca 1903 67-14 83% 15 GA
1668 BORINQUEN COQUI 18-F guille 1903 5-2 71% 18 PR
1669 Vaqueras 11-F edwin 1902 16-8 67% 11 PR
1670 CYVBC Surge 17-Black 1902 34-17 67% 17 OH
1671 Premier Nebraska 16-Red 1902 34-15 69% 16 NE
1672 NKYVC 15-2 tide 1902 46-23 67% 15 KY
1673 TeamLVC 16-Black 1902 48-27 64% 16 NY
1674 Vital 16-1 gold 1902 35-30 54% 16 MN
1675 Academy 16-E phoenix 1902 50-31 62% 16 IN
1676 City 13 Gold 1902 27-27 50% 13 CA
1677 WD Nation 15-Blue 1901 45-9 83% 15 LA
1678 Balboa Bay 18-Blue 1901 31-17 65% 18 CA
1679 FRVBC 17-Black 1901 17-7 71% 17 CO
1680 Carolina Rogue 17-Black 1901 19-33 37% 17 SC
1681 CJV 13 Mizuno 1901 32-30 52% 13 NC
1682 Illini Elite 16-Black 1901 47-26 64% 16 IL
1683 BCS Skyline H 13-Royal 1901 39-23 63% 13 TX
1684 H. Skyline TW 16-1 1901 4-4 50% 16 NV
1685 SVC NGV 12-1 nikki 1900 53-18 75% 12 GA
1686 Amarillo Xtreme 12-Rivals 1900 34-10 77% 12 TX
1687 AZ REV 16 Elite 1900 50-30 63% 16 AZ
1688 Core STL 14-Navy 1900 38-16 69% 14 MO
1689 Vegas Aces 17-Ren 1900 29-35 45% 17 NV
1690 VIP ACADEMY 16-1 1900 12-3 80% 16 TX
1691 SC Rockstar 13-Lacey 1899 31-25 55% 13 CA
1692 JERSEY JRS 18-National 1899 6-10 38% 18 NJ
1693 OVBC 12-Purple 1899 31-3 91% 12 WI
1694 WVBA 18-Adidas 1899 30-17 64% 18 WA
1695 NHouston Elite 15-Premier 1899 39-13 75% 15 TX
1696 EMV 13-Black mcneider 1899 40-13 71% 13 TX
1697 Laredo Premier 11-Force 1898 32-10 76% 11 TX
1698 Yuba Elite 12-Pink 1898 64-7 90% 12 CA
1699 AP 13-Baden 1898 41-25 62% 13 TX
1700 Cajun Elite 17 Adam 1898 37-13 74% 17 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.