2025-2026 Season — Page 34 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1651 | Alliance 15-Molten | 1905 | 33-23 | 59% | 15 | TN |
| 1652 | Landshark 13-Black | 1905 | 30-6 | 83% | 13 | KS |
| 1653 | COAST 14-Andy | 1905 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 1654 | Vibe 14-1 | 1905 | 14-1 | 93% | 14 | CA |
| 1655 | Tri-State Elite 17-White | 1904 | 37-26 | 59% | 17 | KY |
| 1656 | MAVS KC 13 National | 1904 | 26-14 | 65% | 13 | KS |
| 1657 | Tsunami 13-1e jeff | 1904 | 44-16 | 73% | 13 | GA |
| 1658 | BVA 15-N alyssa | 1904 | 36-29 | 55% | 15 | FL |
| 1659 | NKYVC 14-2 tide | 1904 | 35-24 | 59% | 14 | KY |
| 1660 | OT 16-T justin | 1904 | 40-24 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 1661 | Jupiter Elite 17-E | 1904 | 34-35 | 49% | 17 | FL |
| 1662 | SA Magic 14-Elite | 1904 | 47-23 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 1663 | Arete 11-Navy telos | 1903 | 44-15 | 71% | 11 | TX |
| 1664 | Mid-Mich ACES 17 National | 1903 | 46-14 | 77% | 17 | MI |
| 1665 | WPVC 13-Armour black | 1903 | 40-37 | 52% | 13 | FL |
| 1666 | Michigan Volleyball Academy 15 MVA - Rise Academy 51 | 1903 | 28-21 | 57% | 15 | MI |
| 1667 | A5 15-Myca | 1903 | 67-14 | 83% | 15 | GA |
| 1668 | BORINQUEN COQUI 18-F guille | 1903 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | PR |
| 1669 | Vaqueras 11-F edwin | 1902 | 16-8 | 67% | 11 | PR |
| 1670 | CYVBC Surge 17-Black | 1902 | 34-17 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 1671 | Premier Nebraska 16-Red | 1902 | 34-15 | 69% | 16 | NE |
| 1672 | NKYVC 15-2 tide | 1902 | 46-23 | 67% | 15 | KY |
| 1673 | TeamLVC 16-Black | 1902 | 48-27 | 64% | 16 | NY |
| 1674 | Vital 16-1 gold | 1902 | 35-30 | 54% | 16 | MN |
| 1675 | Academy 16-E phoenix | 1902 | 50-31 | 62% | 16 | IN |
| 1676 | City 13 Gold | 1902 | 27-27 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 1677 | WD Nation 15-Blue | 1901 | 45-9 | 83% | 15 | LA |
| 1678 | Balboa Bay 18-Blue | 1901 | 31-17 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 1679 | FRVBC 17-Black | 1901 | 17-7 | 71% | 17 | CO |
| 1680 | Carolina Rogue 17-Black | 1901 | 19-33 | 37% | 17 | SC |
| 1681 | CJV 13 Mizuno | 1901 | 32-30 | 52% | 13 | NC |
| 1682 | Illini Elite 16-Black | 1901 | 47-26 | 64% | 16 | IL |
| 1683 | BCS Skyline H 13-Royal | 1901 | 39-23 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 1684 | H. Skyline TW 16-1 | 1901 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | NV |
| 1685 | SVC NGV 12-1 nikki | 1900 | 53-18 | 75% | 12 | GA |
| 1686 | Amarillo Xtreme 12-Rivals | 1900 | 34-10 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 1687 | AZ REV 16 Elite | 1900 | 50-30 | 63% | 16 | AZ |
| 1688 | Core STL 14-Navy | 1900 | 38-16 | 69% | 14 | MO |
| 1689 | Vegas Aces 17-Ren | 1900 | 29-35 | 45% | 17 | NV |
| 1690 | VIP ACADEMY 16-1 | 1900 | 12-3 | 80% | 16 | TX |
| 1691 | SC Rockstar 13-Lacey | 1899 | 31-25 | 55% | 13 | CA |
| 1692 | JERSEY JRS 18-National | 1899 | 6-10 | 38% | 18 | NJ |
| 1693 | OVBC 12-Purple | 1899 | 31-3 | 91% | 12 | WI |
| 1694 | WVBA 18-Adidas | 1899 | 30-17 | 64% | 18 | WA |
| 1695 | NHouston Elite 15-Premier | 1899 | 39-13 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 1696 | EMV 13-Black mcneider | 1899 | 40-13 | 71% | 13 | TX |
| 1697 | Laredo Premier 11-Force | 1898 | 32-10 | 76% | 11 | TX |
| 1698 | Yuba Elite 12-Pink | 1898 | 64-7 | 90% | 12 | CA |
| 1699 | AP 13-Baden | 1898 | 41-25 | 62% | 13 | TX |
| 1700 | Cajun Elite 17 Adam | 1898 | 37-13 | 74% | 17 | LA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.