2025-2026 Season — Page 34 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1651 | FIVA 13-Avio | 1903 | 54-9 | 86% | 13 | FL |
| 1652 | BORINQUEN COQUI 18-F guille | 1903 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | PR |
| 1653 | Club Legacy 17-Alpha | 1903 | 23-14 | 62% | 17 | NE |
| 1654 | SA Magic 14-Elite | 1903 | 47-23 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 1655 | City 13 Gold | 1902 | 27-27 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 1656 | MAVS 816 15-National | 1902 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | KS |
| 1657 | MVSA 14 Dynamite | 1902 | 69-6 | 91% | 14 | MD |
| 1658 | Core STL 14-Navy | 1902 | 38-16 | 69% | 14 | MO |
| 1659 | Sunshine 14-Westside | 1902 | 32-29 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 1660 | Milwaukee Jr's 17-1 | 1901 | 57-34 | 63% | 17 | WI |
| 1661 | New Age 15-Select | 1901 | 41-41 | 50% | 15 | TX |
| 1662 | PowerPlex 16-Chapman | 1901 | 43-15 | 74% | 16 | IA |
| 1663 | Aleta 15-1 | 1901 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | OH |
| 1664 | Arete 11-Navy telos | 1901 | 44-15 | 71% | 11 | TX |
| 1665 | 808AC 14-Sheri | 1901 | 19-11 | 63% | 14 | HI |
| 1666 | H. Skyline TW 16-1 | 1901 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | |
| 1667 | MDJRS 13 Elite | 1900 | 51-15 | 75% | 13 | MD |
| 1668 | Elevation 12-Peak | 1900 | 51-22 | 70% | 12 | CO |
| 1669 | MiElite 14 Mizuno | 1900 | 35-38 | 48% | 14 | MI |
| 1670 | Amarillo Xtreme 12-Rivals | 1900 | 34-10 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 1671 | BVA 15-N alyssa | 1900 | 36-29 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 1672 | EMV 13-Black mcneider | 1900 | 40-13 | 71% | 13 | TX |
| 1673 | BCS Skyline H 13-Royal | 1899 | 39-23 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 1674 | MiElite 13 Mizuno | 1899 | 31-34 | 48% | 13 | MI |
| 1675 | 1st Alliance 18-Black | 1899 | 30-4 | 88% | 18 | IL |
| 1676 | Tri-State Elite 17-White | 1899 | 37-26 | 59% | 17 | OH |
| 1677 | Advantage 17-Teal | 1899 | 40-27 | 60% | 17 | NC |
| 1678 | Vital 16-1 gold | 1899 | 35-30 | 54% | 16 | MN |
| 1679 | Princeton 17-Black | 1899 | 30-23 | 57% | 17 | NJ |
| 1680 | WVBA 18-Adidas | 1899 | 30-17 | 64% | 18 | WA |
| 1681 | Elevation 15-Downs | 1899 | 38-26 | 59% | 15 | OH |
| 1682 | St Joe Storm 16-1 | 1898 | 38-9 | 81% | 16 | |
| 1683 | Balboa Bay 15-Blue | 1898 | 37-15 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 1684 | MAVS 816 14-National | 1898 | 32-15 | 68% | 14 | KS |
| 1685 | Surfside 15-Pv elite | 1898 | 41-21 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 1686 | WD Nation 15-Blue | 1898 | 45-9 | 83% | 15 | LA |
| 1687 | 805 Elite 16-National | 1898 | 44-17 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 1688 | CYVBC Surge 17-Black | 1898 | 34-17 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 1689 | Elevate 16-Cate | 1898 | 42-11 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 1690 | WSRVC 14-Lovato | 1897 | 40-13 | 75% | 14 | |
| 1691 | AP 16 Baden | 1897 | 43-15 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 1692 | NKYVC 14-2 tide | 1897 | 35-24 | 59% | 14 | KY |
| 1693 | Top Flight 18 Elite | 1897 | 36-12 | 75% | 18 | IL |
| 1694 | Laredo Premier 11-Force | 1897 | 32-10 | 76% | 11 | TX |
| 1695 | MichioChicago 14-Bluesmoke | 1897 | 25-21 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 1696 | WF Waves 17-Brandy | 1897 | 42-17 | 71% | 17 | FL |
| 1697 | Angelo Rise 13-1 | 1896 | 38-10 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 1698 | EXCEL 15-National white | 1896 | 30-25 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 1699 | NHouston Elite 15-Premier | 1896 | 39-13 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 1700 | OT 16-T justin | 1896 | 40-24 | 63% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.