2025-2026 Season — Page 33 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601 | FSJ 16-Elite | 1908 | 45-12 | 75% | 16 | AR |
| 1602 | Club Sol 14-Teal | 1907 | 46-30 | 61% | 14 | |
| 1603 | STVA 12-1 eddie | 1907 | 54-16 | 76% | 12 | TX |
| 1604 | RVC 18 National | 1907 | 29-13 | 69% | 18 | VA |
| 1605 | Stars 15 Tinsley | 1907 | 58-18 | 76% | 15 | SC |
| 1606 | Huskies 17-Premier | 1907 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | CT |
| 1607 | Red Rock 17-Michelle - walnut creek | 1907 | 27-33 | 45% | 17 | CA |
| 1608 | Madfrog 12-N white | 1907 | 45-10 | 79% | 12 | TX |
| 1609 | Elevation 11-Dawn | 1907 | 22-7 | 73% | 11 | OH |
| 1610 | ACESH 16-1 | 1907 | 10-5 | 67% | 16 | HI |
| 1611 | CJV 13 Mizuno | 1906 | 32-30 | 52% | 13 | NC |
| 1612 | MVSA 14 Force | 1906 | 44-26 | 63% | 14 | MD |
| 1613 | Storm 15 Adidas | 1906 | 43-20 | 68% | 15 | AR |
| 1614 | WPVC 13-Armour black | 1905 | 40-37 | 52% | 13 | FL |
| 1615 | Mid-Mich ACES 17 National | 1905 | 46-14 | 77% | 17 | MI |
| 1616 | New WAVE 15 Tsunami | 1905 | 39-22 | 64% | 15 | IL |
| 1617 | OMNI 15-National | 1905 | 27-41 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 1618 | VVA 17-DeRuiter | 1905 | 49-19 | 72% | 17 | CA |
| 1619 | VCNebraska 17-Black | 1905 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | NE |
| 1620 | KCV 14-National velez | 1905 | 59-12 | 83% | 14 | TX |
| 1621 | Iowa Select 16-Mizuno | 1905 | 46-28 | 62% | 16 | IA |
| 1622 | TORCH 17-Katie | 1905 | 37-23 | 62% | 17 | CA |
| 1623 | NKJV 15-Blue | 1905 | 32-29 | 52% | 15 | KY |
| 1624 | PV Slammers 12 | 1905 | 43-11 | 78% | 12 | |
| 1625 | SVC 334 15-Sellers | 1905 | 24-7 | 77% | 15 | |
| 1626 | SynergyForce 14-1 natl | 1905 | 39-33 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 1627 | CinciVB Acad 18-1 | 1904 | 23-12 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 1628 | Alliance 15-Molten | 1904 | 33-23 | 59% | 15 | TN |
| 1629 | Chicago Elite 16 Elite | 1904 | 42-27 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 1630 | Balboa Bay 18-Blue | 1904 | 31-17 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 1631 | Munciana 17 Aztecs | 1904 | 40-34 | 54% | 17 | IN |
| 1632 | MoCo MAVS 17-Red | 1904 | 43-34 | 56% | 17 | TX |
| 1633 | NorStar 15-1 | 1904 | 33-23 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 1634 | SoCal VBC 16-Beacons | 1904 | 38-24 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 1635 | Tsunami 13-1e jeff | 1904 | 44-16 | 73% | 13 | GA |
| 1636 | A5 15-Brett | 1904 | 47-33 | 59% | 15 | GA |
| 1637 | Jupiter Elite 17-E | 1904 | 34-35 | 49% | 17 | FL |
| 1638 | Landshark 13-Black | 1904 | 30-6 | 83% | 13 | KS |
| 1639 | FORZA1 NORTH 14-One | 1904 | 28-18 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 1640 | MiElite 14-Elite | 1904 | 29-19 | 60% | 14 | MI |
| 1641 | Wildfire 18-N open | 1904 | 9-12 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 1642 | 864 Elite 15-Matt | 1904 | 50-6 | 89% | 15 | SC |
| 1643 | COAST 14-Andy | 1904 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 1644 | AAC 17-National | 1903 | 56-12 | 82% | 17 | FL |
| 1645 | K2 17-1 elite | 1903 | 36-35 | 51% | 17 | TN |
| 1646 | Illini Elite 16-Black | 1903 | 47-26 | 64% | 16 | IL |
| 1647 | Elevation 16 Peak | 1903 | 38-28 | 58% | 16 | CO |
| 1648 | MAVS KC 13 National | 1903 | 26-14 | 65% | 13 | KS |
| 1649 | Tri-State Elite 14-White | 1903 | 36-23 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 1650 | Arsenal PR 12-Jason | 1903 | 15-8 | 65% | 12 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.