2025-2026 Season — Page 33 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601 | Top Select 16-Top blue | 1909 | 52-30 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 1602 | AP 16 Baden | 1909 | 43-15 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 1603 | New Age 15-Select | 1909 | 41-41 | 50% | 15 | TX |
| 1604 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 18-N elvis | 1908 | 32-11 | 74% | 18 | NJ |
| 1605 | NOVA Juniors 16-S navy | 1908 | 35-32 | 52% | 16 | OH |
| 1606 | OMNI 15-National | 1908 | 27-41 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 1607 | New WAVE 15 Tsunami | 1908 | 39-22 | 64% | 15 | IL |
| 1608 | HIC 14-N keano | 1908 | 38-9 | 81% | 14 | UT |
| 1609 | VCNebraska 12-Elite | 1908 | 12-10 | 55% | 12 | NE |
| 1610 | MVSA 14 Dynamite | 1908 | 69-6 | 91% | 14 | MD |
| 1611 | A5 15-Brett | 1908 | 47-33 | 59% | 15 | GA |
| 1612 | 305VBC 12-N alan | 1908 | 38-20 | 66% | 12 | FL |
| 1613 | MiElite 14 Mizuno | 1908 | 35-38 | 48% | 14 | MI |
| 1614 | Top Notch 17-Elite | 1908 | 26-22 | 54% | 17 | MO |
| 1615 | Venom Volleyball 15 Venom Valor | 1908 | 15-1 | 94% | 15 | FL |
| 1616 | Epic United 14-Elite | 1908 | 37-12 | 76% | 14 | IL |
| 1617 | CinciVB Acad 18-1 | 1908 | 23-12 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 1618 | NKJV 15-Blue | 1908 | 32-29 | 52% | 15 | KY |
| 1619 | Elevation 12-Peak | 1908 | 51-22 | 70% | 12 | CO |
| 1620 | DN 18-Red | 1907 | 14-5 | 70% | 18 | TX |
| 1621 | Sunshine 14-Westside | 1907 | 32-29 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 1622 | Surfside 15-Pv elite | 1907 | 41-21 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 1623 | Iowa Select 16-Mizuno | 1907 | 46-28 | 62% | 16 | IA |
| 1624 | KCV 14-National velez | 1907 | 59-12 | 83% | 14 | TX |
| 1625 | ONE Volleyball 14-1 | 1907 | 54-7 | 89% | 14 | GA |
| 1626 | HNLV 14-Black | 1907 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | HI |
| 1627 | MAVS 816 15-National | 1907 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | KS |
| 1628 | Pacific Coast VC 16 Pacific Coast | 1907 | 13-1 | 93% | 16 | WA |
| 1629 | STVA 18-1 eddie | 1907 | 33-25 | 57% | 18 | TX |
| 1630 | BVA 14-N brooke | 1907 | 37-29 | 56% | 14 | FL |
| 1631 | SMASH 17-S black ice | 1906 | 43-14 | 75% | 17 | MA |
| 1632 | MDJRS 13 Elite | 1906 | 51-15 | 75% | 13 | MD |
| 1633 | 864 Elite 15-Matt | 1906 | 50-6 | 89% | 15 | SC |
| 1634 | Tri-State Elite 14-White | 1906 | 36-23 | 61% | 14 | KY |
| 1635 | FORZA1 NORTH 14-One | 1906 | 28-18 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 1636 | AAC 17-National | 1906 | 56-12 | 82% | 17 | FL |
| 1637 | VCNebraska 17-Black | 1906 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | NE |
| 1638 | A5 15-Jennie | 1906 | 47-21 | 69% | 15 | GA |
| 1639 | ACESH 16-1 | 1906 | 10-5 | 67% | 16 | HI |
| 1640 | Balboa Bay 15-Blue | 1906 | 37-15 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 1641 | Elevate 16-Cate | 1905 | 42-11 | 79% | 16 | SC |
| 1642 | Aleta 15-1 | 1905 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | OH |
| 1643 | MoCo MAVS 17-Red | 1905 | 43-34 | 56% | 17 | TX |
| 1644 | K1 Bayamon PLAZA 17-5 | 1905 | 13-4 | 76% | 17 | PR |
| 1645 | OT 18-J stephen | 1905 | 20-29 | 41% | 18 | FL |
| 1646 | Princeton 17-Black | 1905 | 30-23 | 57% | 17 | NJ |
| 1647 | Elevation 15-Downs | 1905 | 38-26 | 59% | 15 | OH |
| 1648 | EXCEL 15-National white | 1905 | 30-25 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 1649 | WSRVC 14-Lovato | 1905 | 40-13 | 75% | 14 | WY |
| 1650 | NorCal 12-1 black | 1905 | 31-15 | 67% | 12 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.