Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 33 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1601 Top Select 16-Top blue 1909 52-30 63% 16 FL
1602 AP 16 Baden 1909 43-15 74% 16 TX
1603 New Age 15-Select 1909 41-41 50% 15 TX
1604 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 18-N elvis 1908 32-11 74% 18 NJ
1605 NOVA Juniors 16-S navy 1908 35-32 52% 16 OH
1606 OMNI 15-National 1908 27-41 40% 15 CA
1607 New WAVE 15 Tsunami 1908 39-22 64% 15 IL
1608 HIC 14-N keano 1908 38-9 81% 14 UT
1609 VCNebraska 12-Elite 1908 12-10 55% 12 NE
1610 MVSA 14 Dynamite 1908 69-6 91% 14 MD
1611 A5 15-Brett 1908 47-33 59% 15 GA
1612 305VBC 12-N alan 1908 38-20 66% 12 FL
1613 MiElite 14 Mizuno 1908 35-38 48% 14 MI
1614 Top Notch 17-Elite 1908 26-22 54% 17 MO
1615 Venom Volleyball 15 Venom Valor 1908 15-1 94% 15 FL
1616 Epic United 14-Elite 1908 37-12 76% 14 IL
1617 CinciVB Acad 18-1 1908 23-12 66% 18 OH
1618 NKJV 15-Blue 1908 32-29 52% 15 KY
1619 Elevation 12-Peak 1908 51-22 70% 12 CO
1620 DN 18-Red 1907 14-5 70% 18 TX
1621 Sunshine 14-Westside 1907 32-29 52% 14 CA
1622 Surfside 15-Pv elite 1907 41-21 66% 15 CA
1623 Iowa Select 16-Mizuno 1907 46-28 62% 16 IA
1624 KCV 14-National velez 1907 59-12 83% 14 TX
1625 ONE Volleyball 14-1 1907 54-7 89% 14 GA
1626 HNLV 14-Black 1907 17-9 65% 14 HI
1627 MAVS 816 15-National 1907 33-21 61% 15 KS
1628 Pacific Coast VC 16 Pacific Coast 1907 13-1 93% 16 WA
1629 STVA 18-1 eddie 1907 33-25 57% 18 TX
1630 BVA 14-N brooke 1907 37-29 56% 14 FL
1631 SMASH 17-S black ice 1906 43-14 75% 17 MA
1632 MDJRS 13 Elite 1906 51-15 75% 13 MD
1633 864 Elite 15-Matt 1906 50-6 89% 15 SC
1634 Tri-State Elite 14-White 1906 36-23 61% 14 KY
1635 FORZA1 NORTH 14-One 1906 28-18 61% 14 CA
1636 AAC 17-National 1906 56-12 82% 17 FL
1637 VCNebraska 17-Black 1906 19-15 56% 17 NE
1638 A5 15-Jennie 1906 47-21 69% 15 GA
1639 ACESH 16-1 1906 10-5 67% 16 HI
1640 Balboa Bay 15-Blue 1906 37-15 71% 15 CA
1641 Elevate 16-Cate 1905 42-11 79% 16 SC
1642 Aleta 15-1 1905 28-10 74% 15 OH
1643 MoCo MAVS 17-Red 1905 43-34 56% 17 TX
1644 K1 Bayamon PLAZA 17-5 1905 13-4 76% 17 PR
1645 OT 18-J stephen 1905 20-29 41% 18 FL
1646 Princeton 17-Black 1905 30-23 57% 17 NJ
1647 Elevation 15-Downs 1905 38-26 59% 15 OH
1648 EXCEL 15-National white 1905 30-25 52% 15 TX
1649 WSRVC 14-Lovato 1905 40-13 75% 14 WY
1650 NorCal 12-1 black 1905 31-15 67% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.