Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 32 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1551 Legacy Girls 16 Elite 1913 35-19 65% 16 CA
1552 FIELDHOUSE VBC 11-Ikaika toa 1913 7-1 88% 11
1553 BSVBC 14-Black 1913 50-18 72% 14 IL
1554 BRVA 18-1 1912 25-12 68% 18 VA
1555 Circle City 15-White 1912 62-20 76% 15 IN
1556 MN North 15-1 navy 1912 62-21 75% 15 MN
1557 PVA 14 NATIONAL 1912 67-34 66% 14 MO
1558 STVA 14-1 alyssa 1912 43-11 80% 14 TX
1559 Tsunami 16-1e spider 1912 43-22 66% 16 GA
1560 Academy 14-O en fuego 1912 42-43 49% 14 IN
1561 AJV 15-Molten 1912 39-26 60% 15 TX
1562 SMASH 17-S black ice 1912 43-14 75% 17 MA
1563 BRUSA 17-Costa 1912 38-20 66% 17 CA
1564 Nebraska ONE 16-Titanium 1912 15-24 38% 16 NE
1565 SVC NGV 12-1 nikki 1912 53-18 75% 12 GA
1566 CPA 15-Benson 1912 17-7 71% 15 WA
1567 LEGACY 13-Elite gaby 1912 40-34 54% 13 FL
1568 LVA 15-Elite performance 1912 32-28 50% 15 HI
1569 CUVC 17-Premier 1911 38-29 57% 17 NC
1570 Delaware United 16-Navy 1911 33-28 54% 16 DE
1571 FC Elite 13-White 1911 37-3 93% 13 WI
1572 Momentous VBC 15-Tara 1911 23-24 49% 15 CA
1573 Top Select 16-Top blue 1911 52-30 63% 16 FL
1574 305VBC 12-N alan 1911 38-20 66% 12 FL
1575 Epic United 14-Elite 1911 37-12 76% 14 IN
1576 Lions Cityside 14-1 1911 36-17 68% 14 IL
1577 NC Coastal 15-Loma 1911 54-18 75% 15 NC
1578 FC Elite 15-Navy 1911 30-22 58% 15 WI
1579 Pgh Elite 15-Elite 1911 36-28 56% 15 PA
1580 FRVBC 17-1 black 1910 28-29 49% 17 CO
1581 Synergy 17 Uranium 1910 48-32 60% 17 CA
1582 Top Notch 17-Elite 1910 26-22 54% 17 IL
1583 Madfrog 16-N black lu 1910 36-16 69% 16 TX
1584 BVA 14-N brooke 1909 37-29 56% 14 CA
1585 ONE Volleyball 14-1 1909 54-7 89% 14 GA
1586 Boss CLE 13-1 1909 40-22 65% 13 OH
1587 DN 18-Red 1909 14-5 70% 18 TX
1588 NRG 14-Ampd white 1909 42-13 74% 14 TX
1589 EMV 11-Black april 1909 31-8 76% 11 TX
1590 NorCal 12-1 black 1909 31-15 67% 12 CA
1591 Premier Nebraska 16-Red 1908 34-15 69% 16 NE
1592 STVA 18-1 eddie 1908 33-25 57% 18 TX
1593 Texas United 13-Red 1908 31-16 66% 13 TX
1594 208 17-Elite 1908 35-31 53% 17 WA
1595 K1 Bayamon David 15-7 1908 19-5 79% 15 PR
1596 Avoli 17-F tony 1908 22-5 81% 17 PR
1597 DVC 15-Elite 1908 28-2 93% 15 OH
1598 WF Elite 15-Black 1908 42-15 70% 15 TX
1599 NOLA Dana/Melissa 13 1908 14-3 82% 13
1600 MoCo Jrs 16-Adidas 1908 50-14 77% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.