Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 32 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1551 Delta Valley 12-1 1914 10-4 71% 12 CA
1552 Static Volleyball Club 16-1 1914 34-12 74% 16 MO
1553 805 Elite 16-National 1914 44-17 72% 16 CA
1554 FC Elite 13-White 1914 37-3 93% 13 WI
1555 DVC 15-Elite 1913 28-2 93% 15 OH
1556 NorStar 15-1 1913 33-23 59% 15 CA
1557 WAVE 13-Hannah 1913 40-13 75% 13 CA
1558 ARIZONA STORM 14-Lightning 1913 42-36 54% 14 AZ
1559 DG Warriors 18-Gold 1 1913 35-17 66% 18 OH
1560 K1 Bayamon David 15-7 1913 19-5 79% 15 PR
1561 DN 12-Red 1913 31-5 86% 12 TX
1562 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 14-N jeff 1913 35-14 70% 14 NJ
1563 BSVBC 14-Black 1913 50-18 72% 14 IL
1564 A5 12-Erin 1913 58-22 73% 12 GA
1565 CPA 15-Benson 1913 17-7 71% 15 WA
1566 NC Coastal 15-Loma 1913 54-18 75% 15 NC
1567 TORCH 17-Katie 1912 37-23 62% 17 CA
1568 Tsunami 16-1e spider 1912 43-22 66% 16 GA
1569 FC Elite 15-Navy 1912 30-22 58% 15 WI
1570 Arsenal PR 12-Jason 1912 15-8 65% 12 PR
1571 NRG VBC 17-Ampd navy 1911 36-21 63% 17 TX
1572 ARIZONA STORM 15-Lightning 1911 45-42 52% 15 AZ
1573 West Florida Volleyball Club 17-Brandy 1911 42-17 71% 17 AL
1574 PVA 14-National 1911 36-17 68% 14 MO
1575 STVA 14-1 alyssa 1911 43-11 80% 14 TX
1576 ARVC 15-Black 1911 8-2 80% 15 NV
1577 Club Sol 14-Teal 1911 46-30 61% 14 UT
1578 TEJAS 17-Black mike 1911 29-16 63% 17 TX
1579 Avoli 17-F tony 1911 22-5 81% 17 PR
1580 NorthEast Volleyball Club 14-1 1911 43-19 69% 14 CT
1581 Delaware United Volleyball Club 16-Navy 1910 33-28 54% 16 DE
1582 Elevation 11-Dawn 1910 22-7 73% 11 OH
1583 SynergyForce 14-1 natl 1910 39-33 54% 14 CA
1584 Top Flight 18 Elite 1910 36-12 75% 18 IL
1585 FRVBC 17-1 black 1910 28-29 49% 17 CO
1586 Zona VBC 15-Black 1910 34-22 61% 15 AZ
1587 HP South 13-Premier 1910 45-20 69% 13 MO
1588 Advantage 17-Teal 1910 40-27 60% 17 NC
1589 TW Skyline 15-Royal 1909 40-18 69% 15 TX
1590 Storm 15 Adidas 1909 43-20 68% 15 AR
1591 IVBA 17-Ren 1909 33-22 60% 17 MS
1592 STVA 12-1 eddie 1909 54-16 76% 12 TX
1593 AJV 15-Molten 1909 39-26 60% 15 TX
1594 BVC 18-Mallori 1909 34-13 72% 18 CA
1595 208 17-Elite 1909 35-31 53% 17 ID
1596 FEVA 14-Michaela 1909 55-10 85% 14 FL
1597 Alamo 14-Elite 1 1909 47-30 60% 14 TX
1598 Boss CLE 13-1 1909 40-22 65% 13 OH
1599 NRG 14-Ampd white 1909 42-13 74% 14 TX
1600 MIDTN Volleyball 14-Black 1909 63-20 76% 14 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.