2025-2026 Season — Page 32 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1551 | Delta Valley 12-1 | 1914 | 10-4 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 1552 | Static Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1914 | 34-12 | 74% | 16 | MO |
| 1553 | 805 Elite 16-National | 1914 | 44-17 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 1554 | FC Elite 13-White | 1914 | 37-3 | 93% | 13 | WI |
| 1555 | DVC 15-Elite | 1913 | 28-2 | 93% | 15 | OH |
| 1556 | NorStar 15-1 | 1913 | 33-23 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 1557 | WAVE 13-Hannah | 1913 | 40-13 | 75% | 13 | CA |
| 1558 | ARIZONA STORM 14-Lightning | 1913 | 42-36 | 54% | 14 | AZ |
| 1559 | DG Warriors 18-Gold 1 | 1913 | 35-17 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 1560 | K1 Bayamon David 15-7 | 1913 | 19-5 | 79% | 15 | PR |
| 1561 | DN 12-Red | 1913 | 31-5 | 86% | 12 | TX |
| 1562 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 14-N jeff | 1913 | 35-14 | 70% | 14 | NJ |
| 1563 | BSVBC 14-Black | 1913 | 50-18 | 72% | 14 | IL |
| 1564 | A5 12-Erin | 1913 | 58-22 | 73% | 12 | GA |
| 1565 | CPA 15-Benson | 1913 | 17-7 | 71% | 15 | WA |
| 1566 | NC Coastal 15-Loma | 1913 | 54-18 | 75% | 15 | NC |
| 1567 | TORCH 17-Katie | 1912 | 37-23 | 62% | 17 | CA |
| 1568 | Tsunami 16-1e spider | 1912 | 43-22 | 66% | 16 | GA |
| 1569 | FC Elite 15-Navy | 1912 | 30-22 | 58% | 15 | WI |
| 1570 | Arsenal PR 12-Jason | 1912 | 15-8 | 65% | 12 | PR |
| 1571 | NRG VBC 17-Ampd navy | 1911 | 36-21 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 1572 | ARIZONA STORM 15-Lightning | 1911 | 45-42 | 52% | 15 | AZ |
| 1573 | West Florida Volleyball Club 17-Brandy | 1911 | 42-17 | 71% | 17 | AL |
| 1574 | PVA 14-National | 1911 | 36-17 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 1575 | STVA 14-1 alyssa | 1911 | 43-11 | 80% | 14 | TX |
| 1576 | ARVC 15-Black | 1911 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | NV |
| 1577 | Club Sol 14-Teal | 1911 | 46-30 | 61% | 14 | UT |
| 1578 | TEJAS 17-Black mike | 1911 | 29-16 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 1579 | Avoli 17-F tony | 1911 | 22-5 | 81% | 17 | PR |
| 1580 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1911 | 43-19 | 69% | 14 | CT |
| 1581 | Delaware United Volleyball Club 16-Navy | 1910 | 33-28 | 54% | 16 | DE |
| 1582 | Elevation 11-Dawn | 1910 | 22-7 | 73% | 11 | OH |
| 1583 | SynergyForce 14-1 natl | 1910 | 39-33 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 1584 | Top Flight 18 Elite | 1910 | 36-12 | 75% | 18 | IL |
| 1585 | FRVBC 17-1 black | 1910 | 28-29 | 49% | 17 | CO |
| 1586 | Zona VBC 15-Black | 1910 | 34-22 | 61% | 15 | AZ |
| 1587 | HP South 13-Premier | 1910 | 45-20 | 69% | 13 | MO |
| 1588 | Advantage 17-Teal | 1910 | 40-27 | 60% | 17 | NC |
| 1589 | TW Skyline 15-Royal | 1909 | 40-18 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 1590 | Storm 15 Adidas | 1909 | 43-20 | 68% | 15 | AR |
| 1591 | IVBA 17-Ren | 1909 | 33-22 | 60% | 17 | MS |
| 1592 | STVA 12-1 eddie | 1909 | 54-16 | 76% | 12 | TX |
| 1593 | AJV 15-Molten | 1909 | 39-26 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 1594 | BVC 18-Mallori | 1909 | 34-13 | 72% | 18 | CA |
| 1595 | 208 17-Elite | 1909 | 35-31 | 53% | 17 | ID |
| 1596 | FEVA 14-Michaela | 1909 | 55-10 | 85% | 14 | FL |
| 1597 | Alamo 14-Elite 1 | 1909 | 47-30 | 60% | 14 | TX |
| 1598 | Boss CLE 13-1 | 1909 | 40-22 | 65% | 13 | OH |
| 1599 | NRG 14-Ampd white | 1909 | 42-13 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 1600 | MIDTN Volleyball 14-Black | 1909 | 63-20 | 76% | 14 | TN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.