2025-2026 Season — Page 32 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1551 | Legacy Girls 16 Elite | 1913 | 35-19 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 1552 | FIELDHOUSE VBC 11-Ikaika toa | 1913 | 7-1 | 88% | 11 | |
| 1553 | BSVBC 14-Black | 1913 | 50-18 | 72% | 14 | IL |
| 1554 | BRVA 18-1 | 1912 | 25-12 | 68% | 18 | VA |
| 1555 | Circle City 15-White | 1912 | 62-20 | 76% | 15 | IN |
| 1556 | MN North 15-1 navy | 1912 | 62-21 | 75% | 15 | MN |
| 1557 | PVA 14 NATIONAL | 1912 | 67-34 | 66% | 14 | MO |
| 1558 | STVA 14-1 alyssa | 1912 | 43-11 | 80% | 14 | TX |
| 1559 | Tsunami 16-1e spider | 1912 | 43-22 | 66% | 16 | GA |
| 1560 | Academy 14-O en fuego | 1912 | 42-43 | 49% | 14 | IN |
| 1561 | AJV 15-Molten | 1912 | 39-26 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 1562 | SMASH 17-S black ice | 1912 | 43-14 | 75% | 17 | MA |
| 1563 | BRUSA 17-Costa | 1912 | 38-20 | 66% | 17 | CA |
| 1564 | Nebraska ONE 16-Titanium | 1912 | 15-24 | 38% | 16 | NE |
| 1565 | SVC NGV 12-1 nikki | 1912 | 53-18 | 75% | 12 | GA |
| 1566 | CPA 15-Benson | 1912 | 17-7 | 71% | 15 | WA |
| 1567 | LEGACY 13-Elite gaby | 1912 | 40-34 | 54% | 13 | FL |
| 1568 | LVA 15-Elite performance | 1912 | 32-28 | 50% | 15 | HI |
| 1569 | CUVC 17-Premier | 1911 | 38-29 | 57% | 17 | NC |
| 1570 | Delaware United 16-Navy | 1911 | 33-28 | 54% | 16 | DE |
| 1571 | FC Elite 13-White | 1911 | 37-3 | 93% | 13 | WI |
| 1572 | Momentous VBC 15-Tara | 1911 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | CA |
| 1573 | Top Select 16-Top blue | 1911 | 52-30 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 1574 | 305VBC 12-N alan | 1911 | 38-20 | 66% | 12 | FL |
| 1575 | Epic United 14-Elite | 1911 | 37-12 | 76% | 14 | IN |
| 1576 | Lions Cityside 14-1 | 1911 | 36-17 | 68% | 14 | IL |
| 1577 | NC Coastal 15-Loma | 1911 | 54-18 | 75% | 15 | NC |
| 1578 | FC Elite 15-Navy | 1911 | 30-22 | 58% | 15 | WI |
| 1579 | Pgh Elite 15-Elite | 1911 | 36-28 | 56% | 15 | PA |
| 1580 | FRVBC 17-1 black | 1910 | 28-29 | 49% | 17 | CO |
| 1581 | Synergy 17 Uranium | 1910 | 48-32 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 1582 | Top Notch 17-Elite | 1910 | 26-22 | 54% | 17 | IL |
| 1583 | Madfrog 16-N black lu | 1910 | 36-16 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 1584 | BVA 14-N brooke | 1909 | 37-29 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 1585 | ONE Volleyball 14-1 | 1909 | 54-7 | 89% | 14 | GA |
| 1586 | Boss CLE 13-1 | 1909 | 40-22 | 65% | 13 | OH |
| 1587 | DN 18-Red | 1909 | 14-5 | 70% | 18 | TX |
| 1588 | NRG 14-Ampd white | 1909 | 42-13 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 1589 | EMV 11-Black april | 1909 | 31-8 | 76% | 11 | TX |
| 1590 | NorCal 12-1 black | 1909 | 31-15 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 1591 | Premier Nebraska 16-Red | 1908 | 34-15 | 69% | 16 | NE |
| 1592 | STVA 18-1 eddie | 1908 | 33-25 | 57% | 18 | TX |
| 1593 | Texas United 13-Red | 1908 | 31-16 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 1594 | 208 17-Elite | 1908 | 35-31 | 53% | 17 | WA |
| 1595 | K1 Bayamon David 15-7 | 1908 | 19-5 | 79% | 15 | PR |
| 1596 | Avoli 17-F tony | 1908 | 22-5 | 81% | 17 | PR |
| 1597 | DVC 15-Elite | 1908 | 28-2 | 93% | 15 | OH |
| 1598 | WF Elite 15-Black | 1908 | 42-15 | 70% | 15 | TX |
| 1599 | NOLA Dana/Melissa 13 | 1908 | 14-3 | 82% | 13 | |
| 1600 | MoCo Jrs 16-Adidas | 1908 | 50-14 | 77% | 16 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.