2025-2026 Season — Page 31 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1501 | RockCity 16 N1 | 1918 | 29-30 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 1502 | A5 13-Tom | 1918 | 54-27 | 67% | 13 | GA |
| 1503 | Flyers 17-Usa-andy | 1918 | 38-27 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 1504 | KUIKAHI 16-Wahine rsb | 1918 | 29-20 | 59% | 16 | HI |
| 1505 | USANY Fortitude 18-1 | 1918 | 34-11 | 76% | 18 | NY |
| 1506 | FTL 14-Fusion olivia | 1918 | 38-31 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 1507 | Omni 12-N1 | 1918 | 58-19 | 75% | 12 | AZ |
| 1508 | FORZA1 15 ONE | 1917 | 27-32 | 46% | 15 | CA |
| 1509 | M2 Volleyball 16-E1 | 1917 | 51-25 | 67% | 16 | GA |
| 1510 | NRG VBC 17-Ampd navy | 1917 | 36-21 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 1511 | SoCal VBC 13-Beacons | 1917 | 33-18 | 65% | 13 | CA |
| 1512 | L2 13-1 | 1917 | 41-22 | 65% | 13 | MI |
| 1513 | CWAVE Pinney 13 | 1917 | 44-10 | 81% | 13 | OH |
| 1514 | ARIZONA STORM 14-Lightning | 1916 | 42-36 | 54% | 14 | AZ |
| 1515 | Circle City 15 Volt | 1916 | 55-16 | 77% | 15 | IN |
| 1516 | MiElite 15 Elite | 1916 | 48-24 | 67% | 15 | MI |
| 1517 | A5 12-Erin | 1916 | 58-22 | 73% | 12 | GA |
| 1518 | Impact 18-Carrie | 1916 | 32-6 | 84% | 18 | MI |
| 1519 | DNVB 17-Red | 1916 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | |
| 1520 | H Skyline 15-Black | 1915 | 39-24 | 62% | 15 | TX |
| 1521 | BAVC 16-National sal | 1915 | 60-11 | 85% | 16 | CA |
| 1522 | CoJrs 15-Candace | 1915 | 32-17 | 65% | 15 | CO |
| 1523 | SA Force 18 Darkside | 1915 | 42-19 | 69% | 18 | TX |
| 1524 | Academy 18-O rage | 1915 | 35-23 | 60% | 18 | IN |
| 1525 | Jersey Jrs 18-1 | 1915 | 24-15 | 62% | 18 | NJ |
| 1526 | IVBA 17-Ren | 1915 | 33-22 | 60% | 17 | MS |
| 1527 | Zona 18-Black | 1915 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | AZ |
| 1528 | K1 Bayamon PLAZA 17-5 | 1915 | 13-4 | 76% | 17 | |
| 1529 | NorCal 17-1 black | 1915 | 41-27 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 1530 | DCVA 15-Jose | 1914 | 41-15 | 73% | 15 | NM |
| 1531 | Boiler Jrs 17-O gold | 1914 | 33-47 | 41% | 17 | IN |
| 1532 | Big Sky 17-1 | 1914 | 29-8 | 76% | 17 | MT |
| 1533 | NOVA Juniors 16-S navy | 1914 | 35-32 | 52% | 16 | OH |
| 1534 | Academy West 15-National | 1914 | 32-31 | 51% | 15 | CA |
| 1535 | 913Athletics 16-National | 1914 | 29-18 | 62% | 16 | KS |
| 1536 | FEVA 14-Michaela | 1914 | 55-10 | 85% | 14 | FL |
| 1537 | TEJAS 17-Black mike | 1914 | 29-16 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 1538 | Academy 16 Crystal | 1914 | 37-24 | 61% | 16 | NC |
| 1539 | DN 12-Red | 1914 | 31-5 | 86% | 12 | TX |
| 1540 | Coast United 15 | 1914 | 41-28 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 1541 | Mabel-Canton Jrs 12 | 1913 | 24-1 | 96% | 12 | |
| 1542 | AP 15-Baden | 1913 | 43-24 | 64% | 15 | TX |
| 1543 | Bama Elite 18-E ninjas | 1913 | 42-12 | 78% | 18 | AL |
| 1544 | DG Warriors 18-Gold 1 | 1913 | 35-17 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 1545 | SMV 16-1 black | 1913 | 63-20 | 76% | 16 | MN |
| 1546 | WAVE 13-Hannah | 1913 | 40-13 | 75% | 13 | CA |
| 1547 | Alamo 14-Elite 1 | 1913 | 47-30 | 60% | 14 | TX |
| 1548 | HP South 13-Premier | 1913 | 45-20 | 69% | 13 | MO |
| 1549 | HIC 14-N keano | 1913 | 38-9 | 81% | 14 | UT |
| 1550 | VCN 14-Black | 1913 | 14-2 | 88% | 14 | NE |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.