2025-2026 Season — Page 31 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1501 | Flyers 17-Usa-andy | 1919 | 38-27 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 1502 | PEAK 14-1 elite | 1919 | 34-14 | 71% | 14 | OK |
| 1503 | FORZA1 15 ONE | 1919 | 27-32 | 46% | 15 | CA |
| 1504 | GP 15 National | 1919 | 82-16 | 84% | 15 | FL |
| 1505 | Texas United 13-Red | 1918 | 31-16 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 1506 | H Skyline 15-Black | 1918 | 39-24 | 62% | 15 | TX |
| 1507 | Pursuit 14-National | 1918 | 39-21 | 65% | 14 | MO |
| 1508 | DCVA 15-Jose | 1918 | 41-15 | 73% | 15 | NM |
| 1509 | VVA 17-DeRuiter | 1918 | 49-19 | 72% | 17 | CA |
| 1510 | FTL 14-Fusion olivia | 1918 | 38-31 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 1511 | SA Force 13 Darkside | 1918 | 46-17 | 73% | 13 | TX |
| 1512 | Jersey Jrs 18-1 | 1918 | 24-15 | 62% | 18 | NJ |
| 1513 | CWAVE Pinney 13 | 1918 | 44-10 | 81% | 13 | OH |
| 1514 | Coast United 15 | 1918 | 41-28 | 59% | 15 | SC |
| 1515 | Durham Rebels Volleyball Club 15 Durham Rebels Rogue | 1918 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | ON |
| 1516 | L2 13-1 | 1917 | 41-22 | 65% | 13 | MI |
| 1517 | Madfrog 16-N black lu | 1917 | 36-16 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 1518 | CMASS EDGE 18-Black | 1917 | 38-27 | 58% | 18 | MA |
| 1519 | Circle City 15-White | 1917 | 62-20 | 76% | 15 | IN |
| 1520 | Red Rock 11-Cristine | 1917 | 44-13 | 77% | 11 | CA |
| 1521 | Momentous VBC 15-Tara | 1917 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | CA |
| 1522 | A5 13-Tom | 1917 | 54-27 | 67% | 13 | GA |
| 1523 | NorCal 17-1 black | 1917 | 41-27 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 1524 | Elevation 13-Collins | 1917 | 33-20 | 62% | 13 | OH |
| 1525 | Crossfire 16-1 (NO) | 1917 | 22-8 | 73% | 16 | MN |
| 1526 | SA Force 18 Darkside | 1917 | 42-19 | 69% | 18 | TX |
| 1527 | SMV 16-1 black | 1917 | 63-20 | 76% | 16 | MN |
| 1528 | Huskies 17-Premier | 1917 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | SK |
| 1529 | SDVBC 16-Lindsey | 1916 | 21-19 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 1530 | St Joe Storm 16-1 | 1916 | 38-9 | 81% | 16 | MO |
| 1531 | FSJ 16-Elite | 1916 | 45-12 | 75% | 16 | AR |
| 1532 | Academy 18-O rage | 1916 | 35-23 | 60% | 18 | IN |
| 1533 | FIVA 13-Avio | 1916 | 54-9 | 86% | 13 | FL |
| 1534 | MoCo Jrs 16-Adidas | 1916 | 50-14 | 77% | 16 | TX |
| 1535 | MVSA 14 Force | 1916 | 44-26 | 63% | 14 | MD |
| 1536 | Mindset Premier 14-Red | 1916 | 66-20 | 77% | 14 | IL |
| 1537 | RockCity 16 N1 | 1916 | 29-30 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 1538 | Integrity 14-Intense blue | 1916 | 41-22 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 1539 | Paramount VBC 12 Jasmine | 1915 | 28-3 | 90% | 12 | VA |
| 1540 | Boiler Jrs 17-O gold | 1915 | 33-47 | 41% | 17 | IN |
| 1541 | Academy 14-O en fuego | 1915 | 42-43 | 49% | 14 | IN |
| 1542 | WD Nation 18-Blue | 1915 | 33-10 | 77% | 18 | LA |
| 1543 | K2 17-1 elite | 1915 | 36-35 | 51% | 17 | TN |
| 1544 | Nebraska ONE 16-Titanium | 1914 | 15-24 | 38% | 16 | NE |
| 1545 | I AM VBC 15-Red | 1914 | 54-21 | 72% | 15 | WI |
| 1546 | FORZA1 NORTH 15 ONE | 1914 | 33-25 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 1547 | Red Rock 17-Michelle - walnut creek | 1914 | 27-33 | 45% | 17 | CA |
| 1548 | Wildfire 18-N open | 1914 | 9-12 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 1549 | EMV 11-Black april | 1914 | 31-8 | 76% | 11 | TX |
| 1550 | LEGACY 13-Elite gaby | 1914 | 40-34 | 54% | 13 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.