Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 31 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1501 RockCity 16 N1 1918 29-30 49% 16 OH
1502 A5 13-Tom 1918 54-27 67% 13 GA
1503 Flyers 17-Usa-andy 1918 38-27 55% 17 TX
1504 KUIKAHI 16-Wahine rsb 1918 29-20 59% 16 HI
1505 USANY Fortitude 18-1 1918 34-11 76% 18 NY
1506 FTL 14-Fusion olivia 1918 38-31 55% 14 FL
1507 Omni 12-N1 1918 58-19 75% 12 AZ
1508 FORZA1 15 ONE 1917 27-32 46% 15 CA
1509 M2 Volleyball 16-E1 1917 51-25 67% 16 GA
1510 NRG VBC 17-Ampd navy 1917 36-21 63% 17 TX
1511 SoCal VBC 13-Beacons 1917 33-18 65% 13 CA
1512 L2 13-1 1917 41-22 65% 13 MI
1513 CWAVE Pinney 13 1917 44-10 81% 13 OH
1514 ARIZONA STORM 14-Lightning 1916 42-36 54% 14 AZ
1515 Circle City 15 Volt 1916 55-16 77% 15 IN
1516 MiElite 15 Elite 1916 48-24 67% 15 MI
1517 A5 12-Erin 1916 58-22 73% 12 GA
1518 Impact 18-Carrie 1916 32-6 84% 18 MI
1519 DNVB 17-Red 1916 5-3 63% 17
1520 H Skyline 15-Black 1915 39-24 62% 15 TX
1521 BAVC 16-National sal 1915 60-11 85% 16 CA
1522 CoJrs 15-Candace 1915 32-17 65% 15 CO
1523 SA Force 18 Darkside 1915 42-19 69% 18 TX
1524 Academy 18-O rage 1915 35-23 60% 18 IN
1525 Jersey Jrs 18-1 1915 24-15 62% 18 NJ
1526 IVBA 17-Ren 1915 33-22 60% 17 MS
1527 Zona 18-Black 1915 7-2 78% 18 AZ
1528 K1 Bayamon PLAZA 17-5 1915 13-4 76% 17
1529 NorCal 17-1 black 1915 41-27 60% 17 CA
1530 DCVA 15-Jose 1914 41-15 73% 15 NM
1531 Boiler Jrs 17-O gold 1914 33-47 41% 17 IN
1532 Big Sky 17-1 1914 29-8 76% 17 MT
1533 NOVA Juniors 16-S navy 1914 35-32 52% 16 OH
1534 Academy West 15-National 1914 32-31 51% 15 CA
1535 913Athletics 16-National 1914 29-18 62% 16 KS
1536 FEVA 14-Michaela 1914 55-10 85% 14 FL
1537 TEJAS 17-Black mike 1914 29-16 63% 17 TX
1538 Academy 16 Crystal 1914 37-24 61% 16 NC
1539 DN 12-Red 1914 31-5 86% 12 TX
1540 Coast United 15 1914 41-28 59% 15 CA
1541 Mabel-Canton Jrs 12 1913 24-1 96% 12
1542 AP 15-Baden 1913 43-24 64% 15 TX
1543 Bama Elite 18-E ninjas 1913 42-12 78% 18 AL
1544 DG Warriors 18-Gold 1 1913 35-17 66% 18 OH
1545 SMV 16-1 black 1913 63-20 76% 16 MN
1546 WAVE 13-Hannah 1913 40-13 75% 13 CA
1547 Alamo 14-Elite 1 1913 47-30 60% 14 TX
1548 HP South 13-Premier 1913 45-20 69% 13 MO
1549 HIC 14-N keano 1913 38-9 81% 14 UT
1550 VCN 14-Black 1913 14-2 88% 14 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.