Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 31 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1501 Flyers 17-Usa-andy 1919 38-27 55% 17 TX
1502 PEAK 14-1 elite 1919 34-14 71% 14 OK
1503 FORZA1 15 ONE 1919 27-32 46% 15 CA
1504 GP 15 National 1919 82-16 84% 15 FL
1505 Texas United 13-Red 1918 31-16 66% 13 TX
1506 H Skyline 15-Black 1918 39-24 62% 15 TX
1507 Pursuit 14-National 1918 39-21 65% 14 MO
1508 DCVA 15-Jose 1918 41-15 73% 15 NM
1509 VVA 17-DeRuiter 1918 49-19 72% 17 CA
1510 FTL 14-Fusion olivia 1918 38-31 55% 14 FL
1511 SA Force 13 Darkside 1918 46-17 73% 13 TX
1512 Jersey Jrs 18-1 1918 24-15 62% 18 NJ
1513 CWAVE Pinney 13 1918 44-10 81% 13 OH
1514 Coast United 15 1918 41-28 59% 15 SC
1515 Durham Rebels Volleyball Club 15 Durham Rebels Rogue 1918 7-2 78% 15 ON
1516 L2 13-1 1917 41-22 65% 13 MI
1517 Madfrog 16-N black lu 1917 36-16 69% 16 TX
1518 CMASS EDGE 18-Black 1917 38-27 58% 18 MA
1519 Circle City 15-White 1917 62-20 76% 15 IN
1520 Red Rock 11-Cristine 1917 44-13 77% 11 CA
1521 Momentous VBC 15-Tara 1917 23-24 49% 15 CA
1522 A5 13-Tom 1917 54-27 67% 13 GA
1523 NorCal 17-1 black 1917 41-27 60% 17 CA
1524 Elevation 13-Collins 1917 33-20 62% 13 OH
1525 Crossfire 16-1 (NO) 1917 22-8 73% 16 MN
1526 SA Force 18 Darkside 1917 42-19 69% 18 TX
1527 SMV 16-1 black 1917 63-20 76% 16 MN
1528 Huskies 17-Premier 1917 9-7 56% 17 SK
1529 SDVBC 16-Lindsey 1916 21-19 53% 16 CA
1530 St Joe Storm 16-1 1916 38-9 81% 16 MO
1531 FSJ 16-Elite 1916 45-12 75% 16 AR
1532 Academy 18-O rage 1916 35-23 60% 18 IN
1533 FIVA 13-Avio 1916 54-9 86% 13 FL
1534 MoCo Jrs 16-Adidas 1916 50-14 77% 16 TX
1535 MVSA 14 Force 1916 44-26 63% 14 MD
1536 Mindset Premier 14-Red 1916 66-20 77% 14 IL
1537 RockCity 16 N1 1916 29-30 49% 16 OH
1538 Integrity 14-Intense blue 1916 41-22 63% 14 TX
1539 Paramount VBC 12 Jasmine 1915 28-3 90% 12 VA
1540 Boiler Jrs 17-O gold 1915 33-47 41% 17 IN
1541 Academy 14-O en fuego 1915 42-43 49% 14 IN
1542 WD Nation 18-Blue 1915 33-10 77% 18 LA
1543 K2 17-1 elite 1915 36-35 51% 17 TN
1544 Nebraska ONE 16-Titanium 1914 15-24 38% 16 NE
1545 I AM VBC 15-Red 1914 54-21 72% 15 WI
1546 FORZA1 NORTH 15 ONE 1914 33-25 57% 15 CA
1547 Red Rock 17-Michelle - walnut creek 1914 27-33 45% 17 CA
1548 Wildfire 18-N open 1914 9-12 43% 18 FL
1549 EMV 11-Black april 1914 31-8 76% 11 TX
1550 LEGACY 13-Elite gaby 1914 40-34 54% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.