Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 30 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1451 Legacy 13-2 adidas 1924 36-28 56% 13 MI
1452 VEVA Brave 15-Blue 1924 48-16 75% 15 PA
1453 River City Jrs 15-Red 1924 39-6 87% 15 NE
1454 DME Elite 17-1 1923 65-24 73% 17 FL
1455 GP 14 Premier 1923 83-15 85% 14 FL
1456 Zona VBC 17-Black 1923 34-29 54% 17 AZ
1457 Academy 12 Diamond 1923 34-19 64% 12 NC
1458 HJV 12-Elite 1923 35-14 70% 12 TX
1459 Elevation 13-Collins 1923 33-20 62% 13 OH
1460 Apex 17-Girls 1923 21-8 72% 17 SC
1461 MKE Sting 15-White 1922 60-27 69% 15 WI
1462 AZ REV 15 Elite 1922 37-24 61% 15 AZ
1463 No Limits 17-Navy 1922 54-32 63% 17 FL
1464 BSVBC 12-Black 1922 42-16 72% 12 IL
1465 STATC 16-1 1922 30-10 75% 16 MO
1466 CMASS EDGE 18-Black 1922 38-27 58% 18 MA
1467 Northeast 14-1 1922 43-19 69% 14 CT
1468 K1 Bayamon Weso 14-9 1922 7-2 78% 14
1469 SF Stars 14-1 1921 28-16 64% 14 CA
1470 CC Force 15-1 crossfire 1921 39-14 74% 15 TX
1471 Balance 15-White 1921 43-31 58% 15 IL
1472 Vaqueras 11-F edwin 1921 16-8 67% 11 PR
1473 Stars 16-Sanders 1921 47-33 59% 16 SC
1474 ForceVC 16-1 1921 42-16 72% 16 OH
1475 VCNebraska 12-Elite 1921 12-10 55% 12 NE
1476 VAQUE 16-1 1921 6-2 75% 16
1477 SA Force 13 Darkside 1920 46-17 73% 13 TX
1478 H Skyline 15-White 1920 34-18 65% 15 TX
1479 Tribe 17-Vktry navy 1920 44-30 59% 17 FL
1480 ID Crush 14-Holtzclaw 1920 59-35 63% 14 ID
1481 Husky 18-National 1920 41-20 67% 18 CT
1482 Nebraska ONE 12-Boom 1920 21-11 66% 12 NE
1483 ID Crush IF 14-Keisha 1920 33-16 67% 14 UT
1484 BRUSA 13-1 leanna 1920 11-1 92% 13 CA
1485 Mizuno Northern Lights 14-1 1920 6-0 100% 14
1486 NLVA 15-1 gold 1920 38-18 68% 15 NC
1487 Yorktowne VB 15-Blue 1920 59-22 73% 15 PA
1488 KIVA 13-Black 1919 59-19 76% 13 KY
1489 CPA 14 Hedder 1919 38-23 62% 14 WA
1490 Lex United 14 Elite 1919 46-36 56% 14 KY
1491 I AM VBC 15-Red 1919 54-21 72% 15 WI
1492 City 16 Gold 1919 39-20 66% 16 CA
1493 GP 15 National 1919 82-16 84% 15 FL
1494 Zona VBC 15-Black 1919 30-18 63% 15 AZ
1495 Colorado Juniors 15-Shannon 1919 13-1 93% 15 CO
1496 Panda 14-1 1919 42-19 69% 14 CA
1497 Miami Hype 12-Power 1919 53-14 79% 12 FL
1498 NOLA Lauren/Jaime 15 1919 46-13 78% 15
1499 Integrity 14-Intense blue 1918 41-22 63% 14 TX
1500 PEAK 14-1 elite 1918 34-14 71% 14 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.