Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 30 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1451 Legacy 13-2 adidas 1925 36-28 56% 13 MI
1452 No Limits 17-Navy 1925 54-32 63% 17 FL
1453 United VBA 17 Adidas 1925 44-26 63% 17 TX
1454 BRUSA 17-Costa 1925 38-20 66% 17 CA
1455 DME Elite 17-1 1924 65-24 73% 17 FL
1456 CPA 14 Hedder 1924 38-23 62% 14 WA
1457 SF Stars 14-1 1924 28-16 64% 14 CA
1458 1st Alliance 18-Black 1924 30-4 88% 18 IL
1459 LVA 15-Elite performance 1923 32-28 50% 15 TX
1460 H Skyline 15-White 1923 34-18 65% 15 TX
1461 Nebraska ONE 12-Boom 1923 21-11 66% 12 NE
1462 FC Elite 17-Navy 1923 36-34 51% 17 WI
1463 Michigan Volleyball Academy 18 MVA - Rise Academy 81 1923 21-15 58% 18 MI
1464 Drive Nation 12-Red 1923 16-10 62% 12 TX
1465 ClubRedVB WI 17 Nationals 1923 51-21 71% 17 WI
1466 MN North 15-1 navy 1923 62-21 75% 15 MN
1467 MVA 13-Pedro 1923 37-40 48% 13 FL
1468 BRUSA 13-1 leanna 1922 11-1 92% 13 CA
1469 ID Crush 14-Holtzclaw 1922 59-35 63% 14 ID
1470 BSVBC 12-Black 1922 42-16 72% 12 IL
1471 KIVA 13-Black 1922 59-19 76% 13 KY
1472 MiElite 15 Elite 1921 48-24 67% 15 MI
1473 FH 11-1 ikaika toa 1921 27-8 77% 11 TX
1474 Lex United 14 Elite 1921 46-36 56% 14 KY
1475 Aspire NW 17-1 vancouver 1921 22-3 88% 17 WA
1476 AP 15-Baden 1921 43-24 64% 15 TX
1477 KUIKAHI 16-Wahine rsb 1921 29-20 59% 16 HI
1478 Sky High Adidas 13 Elite 1921 32-24 57% 13 IL
1479 City 16 Gold 1921 39-20 66% 16 CA
1480 Five1 VBC 16 Five:1 16.1-Black 1921 32-23 58% 16 MI
1481 Panda 14-1 1920 42-19 69% 14 CA
1482 ID Crush IF 14-Keisha 1920 33-16 67% 14 ID
1483 913Athletics 16-National 1920 29-18 62% 16 KS
1484 Bama Elite 18-E ninjas 1920 42-12 78% 18 AL
1485 Empire 16-National 1920 45-21 68% 16 CA
1486 SoCal VBC 13-Beacons 1920 33-18 65% 13 CA
1487 Lions 13-Blue 1920 32-12 73% 13 IL
1488 WF Elite 15-Black 1920 42-15 70% 15 TX
1489 A4 Volley 18-Joaco 1920 23-28 45% 18 CA
1490 VCN 14-Black 1920 14-2 88% 14 NE
1491 Academy 16 Crystal 1920 37-24 61% 16 NC
1492 Leaside 16-1 firebolts 1920 6-2 75% 16 ON
1493 Circle City 15 Volt 1919 55-16 77% 15 IN
1494 M2 Volleyball 16-E1 1919 51-25 67% 16 GA
1495 River City Jrs 15-Red 1919 45-9 83% 15 IA
1496 Six Pack 16 1919 45-36 54% 16 IA
1497 Husky 18-National 1919 41-20 67% 18 CT
1498 Omni 12-N1 1919 58-19 75% 12 AZ
1499 Wisconsin Elite 14-Elite 1919 48-21 70% 14 WI
1500 Zona VBC 17-Black 1919 39-30 57% 17 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.