2025-2026 Season — Page 30 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1451 | Legacy 13-2 adidas | 1924 | 36-28 | 56% | 13 | MI |
| 1452 | VEVA Brave 15-Blue | 1924 | 48-16 | 75% | 15 | PA |
| 1453 | River City Jrs 15-Red | 1924 | 39-6 | 87% | 15 | NE |
| 1454 | DME Elite 17-1 | 1923 | 65-24 | 73% | 17 | FL |
| 1455 | GP 14 Premier | 1923 | 83-15 | 85% | 14 | FL |
| 1456 | Zona VBC 17-Black | 1923 | 34-29 | 54% | 17 | AZ |
| 1457 | Academy 12 Diamond | 1923 | 34-19 | 64% | 12 | NC |
| 1458 | HJV 12-Elite | 1923 | 35-14 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 1459 | Elevation 13-Collins | 1923 | 33-20 | 62% | 13 | OH |
| 1460 | Apex 17-Girls | 1923 | 21-8 | 72% | 17 | SC |
| 1461 | MKE Sting 15-White | 1922 | 60-27 | 69% | 15 | WI |
| 1462 | AZ REV 15 Elite | 1922 | 37-24 | 61% | 15 | AZ |
| 1463 | No Limits 17-Navy | 1922 | 54-32 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 1464 | BSVBC 12-Black | 1922 | 42-16 | 72% | 12 | IL |
| 1465 | STATC 16-1 | 1922 | 30-10 | 75% | 16 | MO |
| 1466 | CMASS EDGE 18-Black | 1922 | 38-27 | 58% | 18 | MA |
| 1467 | Northeast 14-1 | 1922 | 43-19 | 69% | 14 | CT |
| 1468 | K1 Bayamon Weso 14-9 | 1922 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | |
| 1469 | SF Stars 14-1 | 1921 | 28-16 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 1470 | CC Force 15-1 crossfire | 1921 | 39-14 | 74% | 15 | TX |
| 1471 | Balance 15-White | 1921 | 43-31 | 58% | 15 | IL |
| 1472 | Vaqueras 11-F edwin | 1921 | 16-8 | 67% | 11 | PR |
| 1473 | Stars 16-Sanders | 1921 | 47-33 | 59% | 16 | SC |
| 1474 | ForceVC 16-1 | 1921 | 42-16 | 72% | 16 | OH |
| 1475 | VCNebraska 12-Elite | 1921 | 12-10 | 55% | 12 | NE |
| 1476 | VAQUE 16-1 | 1921 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | |
| 1477 | SA Force 13 Darkside | 1920 | 46-17 | 73% | 13 | TX |
| 1478 | H Skyline 15-White | 1920 | 34-18 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 1479 | Tribe 17-Vktry navy | 1920 | 44-30 | 59% | 17 | FL |
| 1480 | ID Crush 14-Holtzclaw | 1920 | 59-35 | 63% | 14 | ID |
| 1481 | Husky 18-National | 1920 | 41-20 | 67% | 18 | CT |
| 1482 | Nebraska ONE 12-Boom | 1920 | 21-11 | 66% | 12 | NE |
| 1483 | ID Crush IF 14-Keisha | 1920 | 33-16 | 67% | 14 | UT |
| 1484 | BRUSA 13-1 leanna | 1920 | 11-1 | 92% | 13 | CA |
| 1485 | Mizuno Northern Lights 14-1 | 1920 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 1486 | NLVA 15-1 gold | 1920 | 38-18 | 68% | 15 | NC |
| 1487 | Yorktowne VB 15-Blue | 1920 | 59-22 | 73% | 15 | PA |
| 1488 | KIVA 13-Black | 1919 | 59-19 | 76% | 13 | KY |
| 1489 | CPA 14 Hedder | 1919 | 38-23 | 62% | 14 | WA |
| 1490 | Lex United 14 Elite | 1919 | 46-36 | 56% | 14 | KY |
| 1491 | I AM VBC 15-Red | 1919 | 54-21 | 72% | 15 | WI |
| 1492 | City 16 Gold | 1919 | 39-20 | 66% | 16 | CA |
| 1493 | GP 15 National | 1919 | 82-16 | 84% | 15 | FL |
| 1494 | Zona VBC 15-Black | 1919 | 30-18 | 63% | 15 | AZ |
| 1495 | Colorado Juniors 15-Shannon | 1919 | 13-1 | 93% | 15 | CO |
| 1496 | Panda 14-1 | 1919 | 42-19 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 1497 | Miami Hype 12-Power | 1919 | 53-14 | 79% | 12 | FL |
| 1498 | NOLA Lauren/Jaime 15 | 1919 | 46-13 | 78% | 15 | |
| 1499 | Integrity 14-Intense blue | 1918 | 41-22 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 1500 | PEAK 14-1 elite | 1918 | 34-14 | 71% | 14 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.