2025-2026 Season — Page 30 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1451 | Legacy 13-2 adidas | 1925 | 36-28 | 56% | 13 | MI |
| 1452 | No Limits 17-Navy | 1925 | 54-32 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 1453 | United VBA 17 Adidas | 1925 | 44-26 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 1454 | BRUSA 17-Costa | 1925 | 38-20 | 66% | 17 | CA |
| 1455 | DME Elite 17-1 | 1924 | 65-24 | 73% | 17 | FL |
| 1456 | CPA 14 Hedder | 1924 | 38-23 | 62% | 14 | WA |
| 1457 | SF Stars 14-1 | 1924 | 28-16 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 1458 | 1st Alliance 18-Black | 1924 | 30-4 | 88% | 18 | IL |
| 1459 | LVA 15-Elite performance | 1923 | 32-28 | 50% | 15 | TX |
| 1460 | H Skyline 15-White | 1923 | 34-18 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 1461 | Nebraska ONE 12-Boom | 1923 | 21-11 | 66% | 12 | NE |
| 1462 | FC Elite 17-Navy | 1923 | 36-34 | 51% | 17 | WI |
| 1463 | Michigan Volleyball Academy 18 MVA - Rise Academy 81 | 1923 | 21-15 | 58% | 18 | MI |
| 1464 | Drive Nation 12-Red | 1923 | 16-10 | 62% | 12 | TX |
| 1465 | ClubRedVB WI 17 Nationals | 1923 | 51-21 | 71% | 17 | WI |
| 1466 | MN North 15-1 navy | 1923 | 62-21 | 75% | 15 | MN |
| 1467 | MVA 13-Pedro | 1923 | 37-40 | 48% | 13 | FL |
| 1468 | BRUSA 13-1 leanna | 1922 | 11-1 | 92% | 13 | CA |
| 1469 | ID Crush 14-Holtzclaw | 1922 | 59-35 | 63% | 14 | ID |
| 1470 | BSVBC 12-Black | 1922 | 42-16 | 72% | 12 | IL |
| 1471 | KIVA 13-Black | 1922 | 59-19 | 76% | 13 | KY |
| 1472 | MiElite 15 Elite | 1921 | 48-24 | 67% | 15 | MI |
| 1473 | FH 11-1 ikaika toa | 1921 | 27-8 | 77% | 11 | TX |
| 1474 | Lex United 14 Elite | 1921 | 46-36 | 56% | 14 | KY |
| 1475 | Aspire NW 17-1 vancouver | 1921 | 22-3 | 88% | 17 | WA |
| 1476 | AP 15-Baden | 1921 | 43-24 | 64% | 15 | TX |
| 1477 | KUIKAHI 16-Wahine rsb | 1921 | 29-20 | 59% | 16 | HI |
| 1478 | Sky High Adidas 13 Elite | 1921 | 32-24 | 57% | 13 | IL |
| 1479 | City 16 Gold | 1921 | 39-20 | 66% | 16 | CA |
| 1480 | Five1 VBC 16 Five:1 16.1-Black | 1921 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | MI |
| 1481 | Panda 14-1 | 1920 | 42-19 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 1482 | ID Crush IF 14-Keisha | 1920 | 33-16 | 67% | 14 | ID |
| 1483 | 913Athletics 16-National | 1920 | 29-18 | 62% | 16 | KS |
| 1484 | Bama Elite 18-E ninjas | 1920 | 42-12 | 78% | 18 | AL |
| 1485 | Empire 16-National | 1920 | 45-21 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 1486 | SoCal VBC 13-Beacons | 1920 | 33-18 | 65% | 13 | CA |
| 1487 | Lions 13-Blue | 1920 | 32-12 | 73% | 13 | IL |
| 1488 | WF Elite 15-Black | 1920 | 42-15 | 70% | 15 | TX |
| 1489 | A4 Volley 18-Joaco | 1920 | 23-28 | 45% | 18 | CA |
| 1490 | VCN 14-Black | 1920 | 14-2 | 88% | 14 | NE |
| 1491 | Academy 16 Crystal | 1920 | 37-24 | 61% | 16 | NC |
| 1492 | Leaside 16-1 firebolts | 1920 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | ON |
| 1493 | Circle City 15 Volt | 1919 | 55-16 | 77% | 15 | IN |
| 1494 | M2 Volleyball 16-E1 | 1919 | 51-25 | 67% | 16 | GA |
| 1495 | River City Jrs 15-Red | 1919 | 45-9 | 83% | 15 | IA |
| 1496 | Six Pack 16 | 1919 | 45-36 | 54% | 16 | IA |
| 1497 | Husky 18-National | 1919 | 41-20 | 67% | 18 | CT |
| 1498 | Omni 12-N1 | 1919 | 58-19 | 75% | 12 | AZ |
| 1499 | Wisconsin Elite 14-Elite | 1919 | 48-21 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 1500 | Zona VBC 17-Black | 1919 | 39-30 | 57% | 17 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.