Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1401 Club OAHO 14-Black 1929 39-9 81% 14 CA
1402 SWMNVB 18-1 1928 30-4 88% 18
1403 Metro 16-National 1928 43-25 61% 16 DC
1404 MVSA 17 Blaze 1928 49-22 69% 17 MD
1405 Paramount VBC 16 Alec 1928 54-24 68% 16 VA
1406 Tstreet 13-Katie 1928 27-20 57% 13 CA
1407 GRIT 12-Premier 1928 40-3 93% 12 AL
1408 Ka Ulukoa 14 Tanya 1928 35-11 76% 14 HI
1409 863 Elite 15-1 black 1928 49-12 80% 15 FL
1410 MichioChicago 16-Bluesmoke 1928 27-25 52% 16 IL
1411 Lions 13-Blue 1928 32-12 73% 13 IL
1412 VCNebraska 16-Black 1928 14-14 50% 16 NE
1413 Dallas Premier 15-Black taly 1928 7-3 70% 15
1414 Academy 14 Crystal 1927 33-23 59% 14 NC
1415 MDJRS 15-Elite black 1927 51-39 55% 15 MD
1416 OT 17-T jose 1927 41-33 55% 17 FL
1417 KIVA 16-Black 1927 57-27 68% 16 KY
1418 SC Rockstar 14-Hawk 1927 37-19 66% 14 CA
1419 STORM Tornado 18-1 1927 11-5 69% 18
1420 Team Momentum 14 Navy 1927 49-19 72% 14 MO
1421 KEVC 16-1 1926 40-13 75% 16
1422 AZ Sky 17-Blue 1926 46-31 60% 17 AZ
1423 Empire 16-National 1926 45-21 68% 16 CA
1424 Mem Metro 18 Masters 1926 35-11 76% 18 TN
1425 RAGE 13-Ari 1926 40-32 56% 13 CA
1426 RRHEAT 15-1 miahna 1926 32-14 70% 15 UT
1427 NHouston Elite 12-Premier 1926 34-16 68% 12 TX
1428 Drive Nation 13-Red 1926 16-9 64% 13 TX
1429 Yorktowne VB 17-Blue 1926 57-27 68% 17 PA
1430 Ike Loa 14-Paki 1925 27-4 87% 14
1431 Club Sol 16-Teal 1925 55-30 65% 16
1432 BAVA 15 Blaze 1925 62-26 70% 15 MD
1433 STVA 16-2 gilberto 1925 41-30 58% 16 TX
1434 UVA 16-Matt 1925 44-25 64% 16 VA
1435 Tstreet 15-Curtis 1925 33-28 54% 15 CA
1436 United VBA 17 Adidas 1925 44-26 63% 17 TX
1437 A4 Volley 18-Joaco 1925 23-28 45% 18 CA
1438 Zona VBC 18-Black 1925 33-25 57% 18 AZ
1439 Jupiter Elite 14-E 1925 37-29 56% 14 FL
1440 Delta Valley 12-1 1925 10-4 71% 12 CA
1441 Blue Ridge 14-Orange 1925 22-3 88% 14 VA
1442 Drive Nation 12-Red 1925 16-10 62% 12 TX
1443 FH 11-1 ikaika toa 1925 11-5 69% 11 TX
1444 Sky High Adidas 13 Elite 1924 32-24 57% 13 IL
1445 BCS Skyline H 15-Royal 1924 38-24 61% 15 TX
1446 DBQ Insanity 14-1 national 1924 40-21 66% 14 IA
1447 NIVA 18-PURPLE 1924 54-15 78% 18 IN
1448 Adversity 16-Prpl adidas 1924 38-30 56% 16 IL
1449 MVA 13-Pedro 1924 37-40 48% 13 FL
1450 Aspire NW 17-1 vancouver 1924 22-3 88% 17 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.