Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1401 Club Fusion 17-1 national 1930 30-25 55% 17 IL
1402 Adversity 16-Prpl adidas 1930 38-30 56% 16 IL
1403 Yorktowne VB 17-Blue 1930 57-27 68% 17 PA
1404 Club Sol 16-Teal 1930 55-30 65% 16 UT
1405 Club OAHO 14-Black 1930 39-9 81% 14 CA
1406 Next Level 13-1 josue 1930 24-12 67% 13 PR
1407 DN 15-Red 1930 8-1 89% 15 TX
1408 UVA 16-Matt 1930 44-25 64% 16 CA
1409 OT 17-T jose 1930 41-33 55% 17 FL
1410 SoCal VBC 16-Beacons 1929 38-24 61% 16 CA
1411 Heat Volleyball Academy 13-Red 1929 51-8 85% 13 TX
1412 808AC 14-Sheri 1929 32-11 74% 14 HI
1413 Tstreet 13-Katie 1929 27-20 57% 13 CA
1414 NHouston Elite 12-Premier 1929 34-16 68% 12 TX
1415 MichioChicago 16-Bluesmoke 1929 27-25 52% 16 IL
1416 KC Power 14-2 1929 32-23 58% 14 KS
1417 RRHEAT 15-1 miahna 1929 32-14 70% 15 UT
1418 SIVBC 13 Cyclone 1929 47-26 64% 13 WA
1419 HJV 12-Elite 1929 35-14 70% 12 TX
1420 CC Force 15-1 crossfire 1929 39-14 74% 15 TX
1421 Academy 14 Crystal 1928 33-23 59% 14 NC
1422 Memphis Volleyball Academy 13-1 1928 12-4 75% 13 TN
1423 Paramount VBC 16 Alec 1928 54-24 68% 16 VA
1424 Team Momentum 14 Navy 1928 49-19 72% 14 MO
1425 DNVB 17-Red 1928 5-3 63% 17 MA
1426 STORM Tornado 18-1 1928 11-5 69% 18 ON
1427 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-F arcangel 1927 6-2 75% 14 PR
1428 Synergy 17 Uranium 1927 48-32 60% 17 PA
1429 Elevation 16 Peak 1927 38-28 58% 16 CO
1430 Tribe 17-Vktry navy 1927 44-30 59% 17 FL
1431 Academy 12 Diamond 1927 34-19 64% 12 NC
1432 Aspire NW 13-1 beaverton 1927 36-21 63% 13 OR
1433 NIVA 18-PURPLE 1927 54-15 78% 18 IN
1434 STVA 16-2 gilberto 1927 41-30 58% 16 TX
1435 SWMNVB 18-1 1927 30-4 88% 18 MN
1436 RAGE 13-Ari 1927 40-32 56% 13 CA
1437 Aspire NW 14-1 vancouver 1926 15-2 88% 14 WA
1438 DBQ Insanity 14-1 national 1926 40-21 66% 14 IA
1439 GRIT 12-Premier 1926 40-3 93% 12 AL
1440 BAVA 15 Blaze 1926 62-26 70% 15 MD
1441 ForceVC 16-1 1926 42-16 72% 16 OH
1442 GP 14 Premier 1926 83-15 85% 14 FL
1443 NLVC 14-National 1926 42-9 82% 14 TX
1444 Stars 15 Tinsley 1926 58-18 76% 15 SC
1445 Legacy Girls 16 Elite 1925 35-19 65% 16 CA
1446 Stars 16-Sanders 1925 47-33 59% 16 SC
1447 Balance 15-White 1925 43-31 58% 15 IL
1448 SVC 334 15-Sellers 1925 34-16 68% 15 GA
1449 MC 18-1 1925 25-2 86% 18 MT
1450 BAVC 16-National sal 1925 60-11 85% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.