2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1401 | Club Fusion 17-1 national | 1930 | 30-25 | 55% | 17 | IL |
| 1402 | Adversity 16-Prpl adidas | 1930 | 38-30 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 1403 | Yorktowne VB 17-Blue | 1930 | 57-27 | 68% | 17 | PA |
| 1404 | Club Sol 16-Teal | 1930 | 55-30 | 65% | 16 | UT |
| 1405 | Club OAHO 14-Black | 1930 | 39-9 | 81% | 14 | CA |
| 1406 | Next Level 13-1 josue | 1930 | 24-12 | 67% | 13 | PR |
| 1407 | DN 15-Red | 1930 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | TX |
| 1408 | UVA 16-Matt | 1930 | 44-25 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 1409 | OT 17-T jose | 1930 | 41-33 | 55% | 17 | FL |
| 1410 | SoCal VBC 16-Beacons | 1929 | 38-24 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 1411 | Heat Volleyball Academy 13-Red | 1929 | 51-8 | 85% | 13 | TX |
| 1412 | 808AC 14-Sheri | 1929 | 32-11 | 74% | 14 | HI |
| 1413 | Tstreet 13-Katie | 1929 | 27-20 | 57% | 13 | CA |
| 1414 | NHouston Elite 12-Premier | 1929 | 34-16 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 1415 | MichioChicago 16-Bluesmoke | 1929 | 27-25 | 52% | 16 | IL |
| 1416 | KC Power 14-2 | 1929 | 32-23 | 58% | 14 | KS |
| 1417 | RRHEAT 15-1 miahna | 1929 | 32-14 | 70% | 15 | UT |
| 1418 | SIVBC 13 Cyclone | 1929 | 47-26 | 64% | 13 | WA |
| 1419 | HJV 12-Elite | 1929 | 35-14 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 1420 | CC Force 15-1 crossfire | 1929 | 39-14 | 74% | 15 | TX |
| 1421 | Academy 14 Crystal | 1928 | 33-23 | 59% | 14 | NC |
| 1422 | Memphis Volleyball Academy 13-1 | 1928 | 12-4 | 75% | 13 | TN |
| 1423 | Paramount VBC 16 Alec | 1928 | 54-24 | 68% | 16 | VA |
| 1424 | Team Momentum 14 Navy | 1928 | 49-19 | 72% | 14 | MO |
| 1425 | DNVB 17-Red | 1928 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | MA |
| 1426 | STORM Tornado 18-1 | 1928 | 11-5 | 69% | 18 | ON |
| 1427 | BORINQUEN COQUI 14-F arcangel | 1927 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | PR |
| 1428 | Synergy 17 Uranium | 1927 | 48-32 | 60% | 17 | PA |
| 1429 | Elevation 16 Peak | 1927 | 38-28 | 58% | 16 | CO |
| 1430 | Tribe 17-Vktry navy | 1927 | 44-30 | 59% | 17 | FL |
| 1431 | Academy 12 Diamond | 1927 | 34-19 | 64% | 12 | NC |
| 1432 | Aspire NW 13-1 beaverton | 1927 | 36-21 | 63% | 13 | OR |
| 1433 | NIVA 18-PURPLE | 1927 | 54-15 | 78% | 18 | IN |
| 1434 | STVA 16-2 gilberto | 1927 | 41-30 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 1435 | SWMNVB 18-1 | 1927 | 30-4 | 88% | 18 | MN |
| 1436 | RAGE 13-Ari | 1927 | 40-32 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 1437 | Aspire NW 14-1 vancouver | 1926 | 15-2 | 88% | 14 | WA |
| 1438 | DBQ Insanity 14-1 national | 1926 | 40-21 | 66% | 14 | IA |
| 1439 | GRIT 12-Premier | 1926 | 40-3 | 93% | 12 | AL |
| 1440 | BAVA 15 Blaze | 1926 | 62-26 | 70% | 15 | MD |
| 1441 | ForceVC 16-1 | 1926 | 42-16 | 72% | 16 | OH |
| 1442 | GP 14 Premier | 1926 | 83-15 | 85% | 14 | FL |
| 1443 | NLVC 14-National | 1926 | 42-9 | 82% | 14 | TX |
| 1444 | Stars 15 Tinsley | 1926 | 58-18 | 76% | 15 | SC |
| 1445 | Legacy Girls 16 Elite | 1925 | 35-19 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 1446 | Stars 16-Sanders | 1925 | 47-33 | 59% | 16 | SC |
| 1447 | Balance 15-White | 1925 | 43-31 | 58% | 15 | IL |
| 1448 | SVC 334 15-Sellers | 1925 | 34-16 | 68% | 15 | GA |
| 1449 | MC 18-1 | 1925 | 25-2 | 86% | 18 | MT |
| 1450 | BAVC 16-National sal | 1925 | 60-11 | 85% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.