2025-2026 Season — Page 29 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1401 | Club OAHO 14-Black | 1929 | 39-9 | 81% | 14 | CA |
| 1402 | SWMNVB 18-1 | 1928 | 30-4 | 88% | 18 | |
| 1403 | Metro 16-National | 1928 | 43-25 | 61% | 16 | DC |
| 1404 | MVSA 17 Blaze | 1928 | 49-22 | 69% | 17 | MD |
| 1405 | Paramount VBC 16 Alec | 1928 | 54-24 | 68% | 16 | VA |
| 1406 | Tstreet 13-Katie | 1928 | 27-20 | 57% | 13 | CA |
| 1407 | GRIT 12-Premier | 1928 | 40-3 | 93% | 12 | AL |
| 1408 | Ka Ulukoa 14 Tanya | 1928 | 35-11 | 76% | 14 | HI |
| 1409 | 863 Elite 15-1 black | 1928 | 49-12 | 80% | 15 | FL |
| 1410 | MichioChicago 16-Bluesmoke | 1928 | 27-25 | 52% | 16 | IL |
| 1411 | Lions 13-Blue | 1928 | 32-12 | 73% | 13 | IL |
| 1412 | VCNebraska 16-Black | 1928 | 14-14 | 50% | 16 | NE |
| 1413 | Dallas Premier 15-Black taly | 1928 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | |
| 1414 | Academy 14 Crystal | 1927 | 33-23 | 59% | 14 | NC |
| 1415 | MDJRS 15-Elite black | 1927 | 51-39 | 55% | 15 | MD |
| 1416 | OT 17-T jose | 1927 | 41-33 | 55% | 17 | FL |
| 1417 | KIVA 16-Black | 1927 | 57-27 | 68% | 16 | KY |
| 1418 | SC Rockstar 14-Hawk | 1927 | 37-19 | 66% | 14 | CA |
| 1419 | STORM Tornado 18-1 | 1927 | 11-5 | 69% | 18 | |
| 1420 | Team Momentum 14 Navy | 1927 | 49-19 | 72% | 14 | MO |
| 1421 | KEVC 16-1 | 1926 | 40-13 | 75% | 16 | |
| 1422 | AZ Sky 17-Blue | 1926 | 46-31 | 60% | 17 | AZ |
| 1423 | Empire 16-National | 1926 | 45-21 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 1424 | Mem Metro 18 Masters | 1926 | 35-11 | 76% | 18 | TN |
| 1425 | RAGE 13-Ari | 1926 | 40-32 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 1426 | RRHEAT 15-1 miahna | 1926 | 32-14 | 70% | 15 | UT |
| 1427 | NHouston Elite 12-Premier | 1926 | 34-16 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 1428 | Drive Nation 13-Red | 1926 | 16-9 | 64% | 13 | TX |
| 1429 | Yorktowne VB 17-Blue | 1926 | 57-27 | 68% | 17 | PA |
| 1430 | Ike Loa 14-Paki | 1925 | 27-4 | 87% | 14 | |
| 1431 | Club Sol 16-Teal | 1925 | 55-30 | 65% | 16 | |
| 1432 | BAVA 15 Blaze | 1925 | 62-26 | 70% | 15 | MD |
| 1433 | STVA 16-2 gilberto | 1925 | 41-30 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 1434 | UVA 16-Matt | 1925 | 44-25 | 64% | 16 | VA |
| 1435 | Tstreet 15-Curtis | 1925 | 33-28 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 1436 | United VBA 17 Adidas | 1925 | 44-26 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 1437 | A4 Volley 18-Joaco | 1925 | 23-28 | 45% | 18 | CA |
| 1438 | Zona VBC 18-Black | 1925 | 33-25 | 57% | 18 | AZ |
| 1439 | Jupiter Elite 14-E | 1925 | 37-29 | 56% | 14 | FL |
| 1440 | Delta Valley 12-1 | 1925 | 10-4 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 1441 | Blue Ridge 14-Orange | 1925 | 22-3 | 88% | 14 | VA |
| 1442 | Drive Nation 12-Red | 1925 | 16-10 | 62% | 12 | TX |
| 1443 | FH 11-1 ikaika toa | 1925 | 11-5 | 69% | 11 | TX |
| 1444 | Sky High Adidas 13 Elite | 1924 | 32-24 | 57% | 13 | IL |
| 1445 | BCS Skyline H 15-Royal | 1924 | 38-24 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 1446 | DBQ Insanity 14-1 national | 1924 | 40-21 | 66% | 14 | IA |
| 1447 | NIVA 18-PURPLE | 1924 | 54-15 | 78% | 18 | IN |
| 1448 | Adversity 16-Prpl adidas | 1924 | 38-30 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 1449 | MVA 13-Pedro | 1924 | 37-40 | 48% | 13 | FL |
| 1450 | Aspire NW 17-1 vancouver | 1924 | 22-3 | 88% | 17 | WA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.