Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 662 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33051 Shockwave 14-Grey 1386 2-5 29% 14 KS
33052 HVA 13-RED 1386 8-18 31% 13 TX
33053 Bolts 14-B 1386 4-8 31% 14 IA
33054 Insanity Volleyball 16-1 1386 9-19 32% 16 TN
33055 Central California Volleyball Academy 13-Power 1386 4-8 33% 13 CA
33056 Renaissance 12-Red 1386 2-4 33% 12 OH
33057 Oly Reign 13-Blue 1386 13-25 34% 13 WA
33058 Cincy Classics 15-Gray 1386 11-20 35% 15 OH
33059 CHAVC 15-Purple 1386 20-37 35% 15 NC
33060 Midwest Blitz 13-1 1386 6-11 35% 13 KS
33061 CKYV 17-1 1386 12-22 35% 17 KY
33062 SoDak Juniors 17 Windom 1386 17-30 36% 17 MN
33063 Sky High 13-Borrero - spr 1386 5-9 36% 13 IL
33064 1United 11-Metro 1386 5-7 36% 11 TX
33065 AJ 12-Navy 1386 10-18 36% 12 LA
33066 Emerald City 12 Carolina 1386 12-19 36% 12 SC
33067 Platform 16-Silver 1386 14-21 36% 16 IA
33068 Medford 15 1386 5-9 36% 15 MN
33069 LVBC 16-2 1386 18-31 37% 16 CO
33070 TTVC 16-1 1386 3-5 38% 16 HI
33071 LIV 16-3stripe 1386 14-23 38% 16 LA
33072 MAVA 16-Hammerhead 1386 18-29 38% 16 KY
33073 A2 13 Emerald 1386 5-8 38% 13 OH
33074 Attack 11-Select 1386 8-13 38% 11 IL
33075 Farmington Volleyball Club 14-2 1386 5-8 38% 14 MN
33076 Tstreet SN 18-Dylan 1386 17-28 38% 18 NV
33077 Skyline 15 1386 9-15 38% 15 CO
33078 Stars Columbia 13 Kennedy 1386 17-27 39% 13 SC
33079 MVA 13-White 1386 12-19 39% 13 MI
33080 SLAM 18-P black 1386 18-28 39% 18 MA
33081 Raleigh 13-Navy 1386 6-9 40% 13 NC
33082 Mana Toa 16-Sam 1386 10-15 40% 16 AL
33083 Champion 12-R white 1386 2-3 40% 12 NC
33084 PVC 12-1a 1386 16-23 41% 12 FL
33085 FTL 17-Nuclear r 1386 11-16 41% 17 FL
33086 Prism 15 Topaz 1386 25-36 41% 15 WA
33087 Lakas 13-Power 1386 18-25 42% 13 CA
33088 WI Flight 16-Blue 1386 10-14 42% 16 WI
33089 Oak Creek K-Force 15 1386 22-31 42% 15 WI
33090 TI Elite 16.3 1386 38-51 43% 16 IN
33091 Lady Strikers Purple 16 1386 6-8 43% 16 CO
33092 SLPVC 11-1 1386 12-16 43% 11 IN
33093 MOVA UA 15-Black 1386 24-29 44% 15 MO
33094 Team Pineapple 14-Green 1386 21-27 44% 14 IN
33095 Smash Koala VBC 14-Team 1386 11-14 44% 14 CA
33096 Alexander Aces 13U 1386 4-5 44% 13 NC
33097 Fearsome 16-Black 1386 14-17 45% 16 AR
33098 Wildfire 17-Tameeka 1386 16-19 46% 17 FL
33099 CT STARS 17-S abbi 1386 17-20 46% 17 CT
33100 ASHOK 15-2 1386 15-16 47% 15 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.