2025-2026 Season — Page 663 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33101 | Jellys 14-Blue | 1386 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | FL |
| 33102 | Storm VB 13-1 | 1386 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | FL |
| 33103 | C1VB 15-Select laurens | 1386 | 16-18 | 47% | 15 | SC |
| 33104 | Tsunami 10-1e bibi/allison | 1386 | 12-13 | 48% | 10 | GA |
| 33105 | VCN 13-Navy | 1386 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | NE |
| 33106 | Adidas OPV 14-2 premier | 1386 | 16-16 | 50% | 14 | OR |
| 33107 | HP 16-Elite white | 1386 | 22-20 | 52% | 16 | MI |
| 33108 | Altitude 16 Climb | 1386 | 15-13 | 52% | 16 | AZ |
| 33109 | PRECISION ONE 13-Instate green | 1386 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | IA |
| 33110 | C1VB In-House MS 13-Maddy | 1386 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | SC |
| 33111 | TVVC 14-White | 1385 | 12-10 | 55% | 14 | OR |
| 33112 | Phoenix Volleyball 13 Phoenix Nova | 1385 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | ON |
| 33113 | ICV 15-Piggee | 1385 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | |
| 33114 | INTEG 17-Club blue | 1385 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | |
| 33115 | Offspeed Volleyball 15-Black | 1385 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | |
| 33116 | HVVC 15-Grey | 1385 | 19-14 | 54% | 15 | MI |
| 33117 | Dream Chasers 18-Purple | 1385 | 9-8 | 53% | 18 | GA |
| 33118 | Legacy KY 18-Black | 1385 | 15-14 | 52% | 18 | KY |
| 33119 | Xtreme 13-1 | 1385 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | CO |
| 33120 | Red Rock 14-Premier derby - rwc | 1385 | 8-8 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 33121 | The House 15-Black | 1385 | 40-45 | 47% | 15 | MI |
| 33122 | Boston United 14-Select - aria | 1385 | 14-16 | 47% | 14 | MA |
| 33123 | Azone Volleyball Club 14 Azone Thunder (AZ) (36) | 1385 | 13-15 | 46% | 14 | AZ |
| 33124 | EVA 14-White | 1385 | 13-15 | 46% | 14 | AR |
| 33125 | Texas Serve 15-S silver | 1385 | 13-15 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 33126 | RVC Legacy 14 | 1385 | 113-117 | 46% | 14 | TX |
| 33127 | Upontop 18-S - 2 | 1385 | 13-16 | 45% | 18 | FL |
| 33128 | Lonestar Thunder 12-Blue | 1385 | 10-10 | 45% | 12 | TX |
| 33129 | DuPage Elite 15 American | 1385 | 24-30 | 44% | 15 | IL |
| 33130 | Dig Deep 17-S | 1385 | 15-19 | 44% | 17 | CO |
| 33131 | Renaissance 16-City black | 1385 | 14-16 | 44% | 16 | PA |
| 33132 | Kairos 13-White | 1385 | 16-20 | 44% | 13 | SD |
| 33133 | Medford Storm 16-2 | 1385 | 4-5 | 44% | 16 | WI |
| 33134 | LUV VBC 15 | 1385 | 11-14 | 44% | 15 | NY |
| 33135 | MN North 14-1 red | 1385 | 36-45 | 44% | 14 | MN |
| 33136 | PEAK 18-2 | 1385 | 9-12 | 43% | 18 | SC |
| 33137 | NORCO 17-White | 1385 | 9-12 | 43% | 17 | CO |
| 33138 | NORCO 16-Silver | 1385 | 13-17 | 43% | 16 | CO |
| 33139 | Prodigy 15-4 club | 1385 | 6-8 | 43% | 15 | NY |
| 33140 | Rancho 11-Premier | 1385 | 16-22 | 42% | 11 | CA |
| 33141 | Queen 12 | 1385 | 5-7 | 42% | 12 | WI |
| 33142 | G3 17-National ben | 1385 | 22-31 | 42% | 17 | MO |
| 33143 | Tsunami 15-1n tanesha | 1385 | 13-19 | 41% | 15 | GA |
| 33144 | Tstreet SN 15-Lindsay | 1385 | 11-16 | 41% | 15 | NV |
| 33145 | SynergyForce 14-White | 1385 | 11-16 | 41% | 14 | CA |
| 33146 | 1W 11-Red | 1385 | 9-13 | 41% | 11 | WI |
| 33147 | 828PVC 16-1 | 1385 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | TN |
| 33148 | PIVC Storm 13-Bobby | 1385 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | AL |
| 33149 | MOVA 13-M | 1385 | 6-9 | 40% | 13 | OH |
| 33150 | A5 Gwinnett 16-6 | 1385 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.