Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 664 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33151 Champion 15-N black 1385 17-26 40% 15 NC
33152 APXVB 15-Sam 1385 12-18 39% 15 UT
33153 Centennial CVA 12-1 nosbisch 1385 3-5 38% 12 IA
33154 Club Cactus 15-Navy 1385 11-18 38% 15 AZ
33155 VOLAB 15-1 sean 1385 3-5 38% 15 TX
33156 Exodus 18-S tyclone 1385 3-5 38% 18 CA
33157 LCVC 14-Red 1385 8-13 38% 14 IN
33158 Valley Flames 14-2 1385 10-16 38% 14 TX
33159 ENCORE 18-Navy 1385 20-34 37% 18 CA
33160 BORINQUEN COQUI 13-3f 1385 5-9 36% 13 PR
33161 Monument Volleyball 15 G15 MVB 1385 16-28 36% 15 VA
33162 SKY Elite 14-Gold 1385 6-11 35% 14 PA
33163 ENG_VB 16-1 1385 7-13 35% 16 AR
33164 IA Juniors 15-White 1385 13-25 33% 15 IA
33165 PL Extreme Volleyball 12-1 1385 8-16 33% 12 MN
33166 8058 Peak VBC 14-2 1385 2-4 33% 14 CO
33167 NEVA 12-Elice 1385 7-10 33% 12 UT
33168 417 Juniors 16-3 1385 2-4 33% 16 MO
33169 Texas Serve 12-S white 1385 4-8 33% 12 TX
33170 NODIG 16-1 1385 11-22 33% 16 CA
33171 Morehead Madness 14 Morehead Madness Teal.14 (AH) 1385 6-13 32% 14 HI
33172 Red Rock 15-Peter - walnut creek 1385 11-23 32% 15 CA
33173 Banzai VBC 17-Power 1385 8-17 32% 17 NE
33174 SSVA 14-Navy 1385 4-5 31% 14 PA
33175 Networks Academy 13-1 1385 8-15 31% 13 AL
33176 VEVA Impact 16-Blue hd 1385 18-42 30% 16 PA
33177 SEV 15-2 1385 7-14 30% 15 MN
33178 AVC CLE 13-Navy 1385 6-14 30% 13 OH
33179 CI ELITE 10-Red 1385 5-12 29% 10 IL
33180 BRUSA 14-3 carlos 1385 2-5 29% 14 CA
33181 HUNTERS 17 1385 2-5 29% 17 FL
33182 TORRI 16-Vero 1385 2-5 29% 16 PR
33183 Inspired VB 16-White 1385 5-11 26% 16 MN
33184 Faribo Red 17-1 1385 1-3 25% 17 MN
33185 UVA 12-Local 1385 1-3 25% 12 LA
33186 Lonestar Thunder 13-White 1385 1-3 25% 13 TX
33187 Queen City VBC 13 Queen City Blue (1) 1385 2-6 25% 13 PA
33188 BLA 14-Steph 1385 1-3 25% 14 FL
33189 Powell 14-1 1385 5-12 24% 14 MT
33190 LBK 11-1 1385 2-7 22% 11 OH
33191 Arete 11-Prep navy 1385 2-4 22% 11 TX
33192 757 12-J dexter 1385 1-4 20% 12 VA
33193 APV 16-National royal 1385 8-29 20% 16 TX
33194 Carolina Storm Volleyball Club 16 Carolina Storm 1385 1-4 20% 16 NC
33195 LAVA 10-Red 1385 1-4 20% 10 OH
33196 SMASH Raiders 15-2 1385 1-4 20% 15 OH
33197 NJVBC 14-S riptide 1385 1-4 20% 14 PA
33198 Michio Chicago 14-Cavaliers 1385 1-4 20% 14 IL
33199 MOVSelect 11-Green 1385 1-4 20% 11 OH
33200 Wave 11-1 1385 1-4 20% 11 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.