2025-2026 Season — Page 665 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33201 | 913Athletics 17-1 | 1385 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | KS |
| 33202 | EAST TEXAS ELITE - 13-1 | 1385 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | TX |
| 33203 | OD 14 12 | 1385 | 1-5 | 17% | 12 | IL |
| 33204 | Reign 13 | 1385 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | WY |
| 33205 | SPVB 18 Navy | 1385 | 2-11 | 15% | 18 | IL |
| 33206 | Sonics VC 13 | 1385 | 1-6 | 14% | 13 | MI |
| 33207 | Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 15 SWVC EVANSTON15-RED | 1385 | 1-3 | 14% | 15 | WY |
| 33208 | NW Force 16-1 | 1385 | 2-7 | 13% | 16 | MO |
| 33209 | Border West 14-2 | 1385 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 33210 | Controlled Chaos 14-S | 1385 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | PA |
| 33211 | Page 17 | 1385 | 0-3 | 0% | 17 | AZ |
| 33212 | KVBC 10-S | 1385 | 0-4 | 0% | 10 | MN |
| 33213 | The Woodlands United 15-Adidas | 1385 | 0-7 | 0% | 15 | MN |
| 33214 | TX TFV 14-Falcons | 1385 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | TX |
| 33215 | SJVBC Girls 14-Black | 1385 | 0-5 | 0% | 14 | NJ |
| 33216 | Starlings 505 14-1 | 1385 | 0-7 | 0% | 14 | NM |
| 33217 | Rocori Heat 11-Red | 1385 | 0-4 | 0% | 11 | MN |
| 33218 | TX Ultimate 11-White | 1385 | 0-4 | 0% | 11 | TX |
| 33219 | Lancers 15-Silver | 1385 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | IA |
| 33220 | adidas DYNASTY 12-3 | 1385 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | KS |
| 33221 | HJVC 13-Red | 1385 | 7-11 | 30% | 13 | |
| 33222 | Cornerstone 13-1 | 1385 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | |
| 33223 | BBV 12-Rose | 1384 | 2-5 | 29% | 12 | NV |
| 33224 | Next Gen 12-Maroon | 1384 | 8-12 | 40% | 12 | MO |
| 33225 | Instinct 12-Wild | 1384 | 11-17 | 32% | 12 | TX |
| 33226 | MCDS 16-1 | 1384 | 0-3 | 0% | 16 | PA |
| 33227 | Cape Elite 12 Levi | 1384 | 11-17 | 39% | 12 | FL |
| 33228 | YVA 12-A | 1384 | 7-15 | 29% | 12 | MT |
| 33229 | Mission 4:10 Volleyball 15 Steadfast (1 Cor. 15:58) (CH) | 1384 | 7-8 | 47% | 15 | |
| 33230 | DBQ Insanity 16-1 | 1384 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | IA |
| 33231 | Fard Academy 13 | 1384 | 0-4 | 0% | 13 | FL |
| 33232 | JJVA Club 11-C | 1384 | 8-9 | 47% | 11 | FL |
| 33233 | NPVA 14-1 | 1384 | 7-13 | 35% | 14 | OR |
| 33234 | SERV 15 Power | 1384 | 22-25 | 47% | 15 | VA |
| 33235 | Excel 18-Black | 1384 | 15-17 | 47% | 18 | FL |
| 33236 | MVP 16-Black | 1384 | 30-35 | 46% | 16 | WI |
| 33237 | MiElite 14-Katty north | 1384 | 19-16 | 46% | 14 | MI |
| 33238 | MOVA UA 16-Black | 1384 | 31-35 | 46% | 16 | MO |
| 33239 | ACE 13-1 | 1384 | 9-11 | 45% | 13 | TN |
| 33240 | PBEVC United 14-1 | 1384 | 14-17 | 45% | 14 | TX |
| 33241 | CHAOS 16-2 gold | 1384 | 24-29 | 45% | 16 | OR |
| 33242 | Level Up 16 Level Up Volleyball (BY) | 1384 | 16-20 | 44% | 16 | LA |
| 33243 | Borderline 13-Falcons | 1384 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | OH |
| 33244 | City Beach 13-Green | 1384 | 28-35 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 33245 | KPV 18-Blue - sarah | 1384 | 14-18 | 44% | 18 | KY |
| 33246 | OK Premier 11-Diamonds | 1384 | 8-10 | 44% | 11 | OK |
| 33247 | Spartans 17 Bravo | 1384 | 19-23 | 44% | 17 | TX |
| 33248 | Proctor 14-Black | 1384 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | MN |
| 33249 | THE Oakland Volleyball Program 16-Eta | 1384 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | CA |
| 33250 | Prospects VBA 11-Aspire a | 1384 | 10-14 | 42% | 11 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.