Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 666 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33251 PVA 15-3 1384 2-4 29% 15 MO
33252 Omaha 18-Pink 1384 2-5 29% 18 CA
33253 KC Thunder 12-Blue 1384 2-5 29% 12 WA
33254 ADK SPIKE 14U 1384 2-5 29% 14 NY
33255 DCVA 18-1 1384 2-5 29% 18 NM
33256 Mid-Mo Heat 14 1384 3-8 27% 14 MO
33257 MAVS KC 16-4 1384 4-8 25% 16 KS
33258 Moxie 11 1384 2-5 25% 11 TX
33259 AVA 15-N dailey 1384 12-36 25% 15 OH
33260 FC Flames 12 1384 3-9 25% 12 CO
33261 EC Power DE 12-Black 1384 7-21 23% 12 MD
33262 MVC 11-1 1384 5-14 23% 11 OH
33263 LEGACY 14-State vince 1384 2-7 22% 14 FL
33264 Starlights 12-Navy 1384 2-5 22% 12 TX
33265 PowerPlex 12-Douglas 1384 8-24 22% 12 IA
33266 LBJ 14-4 1384 1-4 20% 14 ND
33267 PowerPlex Iowa Heart 14-Red 1384 1-4 20% 14 IA
33268 HBJ 12-Russellville 1384 1-4 20% 12 AR
33269 shockwave reading 17-2 1384 1-4 20% 17 PA
33270 P3R 13-Veterans 1384 1-4 20% 13 PA
33271 Alliance 15-1 nashville 1384 1-4 20% 15 TN
33272 Texas Outlaws 12-Silver 1384 2-8 17% 12 TX
33273 BlackGold Volleyball 15-Black 1384 1-5 17% 15 NY
33274 NW Stars 14-White 1384 0-4 0% 14 WI
33275 EndMo VBC 18-Purple 1384 0-3 0% 18 PA
33276 Pella Thunder 18-Black 1384 0-4 0% 18 IA
33277 HMVB 16 1384 0-3 0% 16 CO
33278 UV 16-Cassadee 1384 0-4 0% 16 UT
33279 Rosemount 14-2 1384 0-3 0% 14 MN
33280 Shakopee 12-Red 1384 0-3 0% 12 MN
33281 South County 15-Gold 1384 14-34 29% 15 RI
33282 Iowa City Westside VBC 17 1384 0-4 0% 17 IA
33283 Mission Trails 12-Jackie 1384 2-5 29% 12 CA
33284 915 13-Alexa 1384 13-23 30% 13 TX
33285 Ignite AZ 14 Torch 1384 8-9 47% 14 AZ
33286 BRYC 15-White 1384 24-26 48% 15 VA
33287 3DGE 13-1 black 1384 15-16 48% 13 PA
33288 Emerald City 14 Sally 1384 16-17 48% 14 SC
33289 Club Cactus 14-Navy 1384 14-14 50% 14 AZ
33290 WPVC 15-Elite black 1384 33-30 52% 15 FL
33291 Boiler Jrs 12-M onyx 1384 9-8 53% 12 IN
33292 Boston United 15-Diamond 1384 14-12 54% 15 MA
33293 JKSports HEAT 16 1384 22-19 54% 16 VA
33294 Kokoro Volleyball 14 Wht 1384 21-18 54% 14 MN
33295 REDLINE 13-Gold 1384 5-9 36% 13 MI
33296 CJ HEAT 15-Gold 1384 4-7 36% 15 NJ
33297 Empower 14-National blue 1384 15-26 37% 14 CA
33298 SLAM 16-Black 1384 16-27 37% 16 TX
33299 SLV Ashworth 15U 1384 7-12 37% 15 VA
33300 Highlands 18-Black 1384 6-10 38% 18 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.