Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 667 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33301 Starlings Tucson 18-Red 1384 3-5 38% 18 CA
33302 Allegiance 14-Red 1384 14-23 38% 14 TX
33303 Illinois Select 14-Pink 1384 10-16 38% 14 IL
33304 SPIRIT VBC 11-1 1384 5-8 38% 11 OH
33305 DEAVB 11-Neon 1384 3-5 38% 11 TX
33306 Havoc 13-Purple 1384 9-17 30% 13 MN
33307 Rose City 18-1 1384 5-8 38% 18 MI
33308 Summit Volleyball Club 11-1 1384 2-3 40% 11 MO
33309 LIVBC Girls 14-White 1384 6-9 40% 14 NY
33310 T4VBC 16-Blue 1384 4-7 36% 16 TX
33311 Apex VBTC 13-Peak white 1384 3-6 33% 13 OH
33312 EliteZ 12-Girls black 1384 10-14 40% 12 NH
33313 Barracuda 12-S 1384 6-9 40% 12 NC
33314 Eastern Elite 15-Orange 1384 8-12 40% 15 NC
33315 Na Koa VBC 14 1384 2-3 40% 14 HI
33316 Ark Valley 17 1384 6-9 40% 17 CO
33317 Tombigbee Volleyball Club 13 1384 8-14 35% 13 MS
33318 BAVA 14-Loggerhead 1384 8-13 35% 14 TX
33319 M2 Volleyball 12-Bev 1384 11-16 41% 12 GA
33320 Intense 12-S - sophie 1384 14-20 41% 12 LA
33321 Max Performance 15-Red 1384 15-22 41% 15 TX
33322 Iron VC 13-2 1384 7-9 41% 13 AL
33323 NIVB 15-Green 1384 11-16 41% 15 MN
33324 WVE 16-3 1384 17-23 41% 16 OR
33325 CID 14-White 1384 11-16 41% 14 ID
33326 OKC Ignite 15-1 1384 12-17 41% 15 OK
33327 MN Select 13-2 1384 19-34 36% 13 MN
33328 HVA 14-Rb blue 1384 9-10 47% 14 TX
33329 Hibbing 14 1384 14-16 47% 14 MN
33330 Greenway 18 1383 7-6 54% 18 MN
33331 Greenway 14 1383 5-4 56% 14 MN
33332 LBK 17-4 1383 7-15 32% 17 OH
33333 Decatur Force 11 Aqua 1383 12-14 46% 11 IN
33334 Northern Virginia Volleyball Association (NVVA) 18 17/18 XP-Green 1383 14-15 48% 18 VA
33335 OK Elevate 16-2 1383 23-23 50% 16 OK
33336 Top Select 14-Gold white 1383 19-19 50% 14 FL
33337 XP 15-Regional 1 1383 20-18 50% 15 IL
33338 STARZ 16-Yellow 1383 19-18 51% 16 IL
33339 NorCal Volleyball Club 12 NorCal Juniors Hannah 4/5 1383 5-11 31% 12 CA
33340 Jaguars 11-Black 1383 4-8 29% 11 NY
33341 Michio Chicago 12-White 1383 10-16 38% 12 IL
33342 TORCH 12-Tara 1383 2-5 29% 12 CA
33343 315 VC 16-1 girls 1383 0-3 0% 16 NY
33344 Keahi 16-Blue 1383 8-8 50% 16 UT
33345 CHiX 12-White 1383 3-6 33% 12 OH
33346 Team Atlantis 12 Team Atlantis Dawn (OV) 1383 0-4 0% 12 OH
33347 MKV 14-A 1383 0-4 0% 14 WA
33348 Blue 15-1 1383 10-19 34% 15 MI
33349 WC 12-Elite black 1383 6-10 38% 12 TX
33350 Aus Velocity 12-Lt green 1383 3-6 33% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.