2025-2026 Season — Page 668 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33351 | Thunderbolt 13-Navy | 1383 | 20-30 | 40% | 13 | MO |
| 33352 | Unified 14-Blue | 1383 | 17-17 | 50% | 14 | MI |
| 33353 | MM Aces 14-Brynn s26 | 1383 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | MI |
| 33354 | NM Cactus 17-Ntl | 1383 | 0-7 | 0% | 17 | CO |
| 33355 | cougar 14 | 1383 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | MX |
| 33356 | Kako'o VBA 16 Amanda | 1383 | 5-9 | 36% | 16 | HI |
| 33357 | BEVC Kryptonite 12-White | 1383 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | TN |
| 33358 | Vernal Velocity Volleyball Club 17 Vernal Velocity Rangely Marybel | 1383 | 3-8 | 27% | 17 | UT |
| 33359 | WAVE 17 Gators | 1383 | 19-26 | 42% | 17 | IN |
| 33360 | FL Momentum 15-Neon | 1383 | 20-25 | 44% | 15 | FL |
| 33361 | SVVC 17-Torrie | 1383 | 16-25 | 38% | 17 | WA |
| 33362 | 310VBC 14-2 | 1383 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | HI |
| 33363 | Wisconsin Ice 15-Purple | 1383 | 8-19 | 29% | 15 | WI |
| 33364 | Red Rock 18-Katie - redwood city | 1383 | 16-29 | 36% | 18 | CA |
| 33365 | Heartland Big Lake 14-Blue | 1383 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 33366 | Purple Elite 14-1 | 1383 | 8-11 | 42% | 14 | MN |
| 33367 | SGJO 14-1 | 1383 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 33368 | WAJ 14-Purple storm | 1383 | 7-13 | 30% | 14 | AL |
| 33369 | MN Royals 15-3 | 1383 | 5-9 | 36% | 15 | MN |
| 33370 | Goldenwest 18 Asics | 1383 | 14-28 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 33371 | Boston United 14-Northeast | 1383 | 21-27 | 44% | 14 | MA |
| 33372 | KIVA 13 Maggie | 1383 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | KY |
| 33373 | MOJO Elite 11-Black | 1383 | 5-9 | 31% | 11 | VA |
| 33374 | Littleton Lightning Volleyball Club 12 LLVBC Littleton Lightning Volleyball Club | 1383 | 4-8 | 33% | 12 | CO |
| 33375 | 417 Juniors G15-6 | 1383 | 1-2 | 20% | 15 | MO |
| 33376 | Club Velocity 15-2 | 1383 | 8-11 | 42% | 15 | MN |
| 33377 | Aspire 11-1 black | 1383 | 6-7 | 46% | 11 | AB |
| 33378 | Club Falcons 15-1s | 1383 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | MN |
| 33379 | TVC 13-1 | 1383 | 9-19 | 30% | 13 | AL |
| 33380 | G-Force 16-Select | 1383 | 18-23 | 44% | 16 | WI |
| 33381 | Lassen 14-2 | 1383 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | NV |
| 33382 | Bluff Impact 15-Royal | 1383 | 5-12 | 29% | 15 | MO |
| 33383 | IVBA SOAR 12 REN | 1383 | 13-20 | 39% | 12 | MS |
| 33384 | Elevate Athletics 14-2 | 1383 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | UT |
| 33385 | Thunder 13-S navy | 1383 | 2-5 | 25% | 13 | MN |
| 33386 | Brookings 11-Black | 1383 | 0-4 | 0% | 11 | SD |
| 33387 | Iowa Impact 16-2 premier | 1383 | 5-21 | 17% | 16 | IA |
| 33388 | OK Premier 12-Purple | 1383 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | OK |
| 33389 | Shockwave 15-Grey | 1383 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | KS |
| 33390 | Kap City Volleyball 18 S | 1383 | 0-3 | 0% | 18 | HI |
| 33391 | TW Skyline 14-Onyx | 1383 | 9-12 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 33392 | TX Charm 14-1 | 1383 | 2-7 | 20% | 14 | TX |
| 33393 | Texas Storm 14-Blue | 1383 | 5-8 | 36% | 14 | TX |
| 33394 | EMV 14-Royal victoria | 1383 | 7-16 | 25% | 14 | TX |
| 33395 | Inferno 14 (BG) | 1383 | 8-18 | 31% | 14 | WI |
| 33396 | SIVA 14-Chantal | 1383 | 11-16 | 41% | 14 | WA |
| 33397 | Balance 11-White | 1383 | 3-6 | 33% | 11 | IL |
| 33398 | SVC Rips 14-1 | 1383 | 16-25 | 39% | 14 | GA |
| 33399 | Prolink 14 Dave | 1383 | 28-33 | 46% | 14 | GA |
| 33400 | OVA 14-Blue | 1383 | 25-37 | 40% | 14 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.