Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 669 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33401 MAVS KC Select 14-2 1383 7-5 44% 14 KS
33402 SEV 13-2 1383 5-9 31% 13 MN
33403 LCVC 14-White 1383 6-9 35% 14 IN
33404 STMA Juniors STMA 12-1 blue 1383 2-3 40% 12 MN
33405 NtroIN 13-1 singleton 1383 0-4 0% 13 IN
33406 ACESZ 13-White 1383 1-4 20% 13 MI
33407 Stingray VBA 15-Select jw 1383 11-16 41% 15 OK
33408 MEVC 16-Pink 1383 12-18 40% 16 SC
33409 DN 13-White 1383 10-16 31% 13 TX
33410 PC Xtreme 17-Black 1383 7-9 39% 17 IL
33411 PR Select 16 1383 5-7 42% 16 PR
33412 TeamLVC 17-Pink 1383 17-32 35% 17 NY
33413 EP STRiVE VBC 10-S black 1383 0-4 0% 10 TX
33414 Miller Juniors 12-Black 1383 5-11 31% 12 IN
33415 CUVB 16-Black 1383 12-23 28% 16 TX
33416 Bravo 13-Luna 1383 14-20 41% 13 CA
33417 VCNL 17-Silver 1383 4-7 36% 17 NE
33418 Rush City Digz 14-1 1383 1-3 25% 14 WI
33419 Chelsea Piers Volleyball Club 17 U17 National Black 1383 4-13 24% 17 CT
33420 Slainte 13-White 1383 18-23 44% 13 CA
33421 PSVA Houston 17-1 1383 16-24 40% 17 GA
33422 Galaxy 12-Kiley 1383 6-9 40% 12 NC
33423 Piedmont VBC 18-Nike 1383 10-13 43% 18 NC
33424 Panther 13-1 1383 3-4 43% 13 CO
33425 603 United 17-Open 1383 8-11 42% 17 NH
33426 AVA TX 16 Extreme 1383 9-11 43% 16 TX
33427 Iowa United 10-2 regional 1383 0-4 0% 10 IA
33428 ETVMR 13-Javi 1383 0-3 0% 13 PR
33429 DURANT XTREME 15 1383 0-4 0% 15 IA
33430 Topeka Saints 13-1 1383 5-13 28% 13 KS
33431 Cap City 15-Green 1383 12-18 40% 15 NC
33432 Pillar 15-Black 1383 14-25 36% 15 OH
33433 Renaissance 15-Red cran 1383 9-14 39% 15 OH
33434 Emerald Force 14 1383 12-14 46% 14 TN
33435 GPA 15-White 1383 18-29 38% 15 OH
33436 CVH SELECT 11-1 1383 4-7 36% 11 PR
33437 Katy Spartans 12-Nike 1383 5-7 36% 12 TX
33438 SOUTHEAST VOLLEYBALL 16-1 1383 1-4 20% 16 OH
33439 NOVA Juniors 16-S white 1383 5-9 36% 16 OH
33440 MDJRS 16-Reg black 1383 8-15 27% 16 MD
33441 Stingray 12-Black 1383 5-14 26% 12 CA
33442 North Kenneth 15-15-1 1382 0-3 0% 15 PR
33443 928 Impact 17 1382 10-18 36% 17 AZ
33444 Premier Nebraska 17-Silver 1382 2-5 29% 17 NE
33445 Monroe Juniors 13-Ice 1382 1-3 25% 13 MI
33446 Academy 11-Crystal 1382 1-4 20% 11 NC
33447 Metro Heat 18 1382 17-25 39% 18 MO
33448 Rise Elite VC 13-Joe 1382 15-14 52% 13 FL
33449 AP 13-Wilco lite gray 1382 6-9 40% 13 TX
33450 Flying Squirrels 13 1382 12-10 55% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.