Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 661 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33001 Premier 17 Enduro 1387 29-36 45% 17 OH
33002 Carolina Sky 13-Premier 1387 13-16 45% 13 SC
33003 A3 15 EOS 1387 17-20 46% 15 TN
33004 Black Swamp 16-3 1387 14-16 47% 16 OH
33005 AVA TX 14-Rally 1387 8-9 47% 14 TX
33006 VVBC 16-1 1387 7-8 47% 16 TX
33007 Windy City Premier 18 1387 26-28 48% 18 IL
33008 Flight 17 Bomia 1387 17-18 49% 17 MI
33009 HPRIME 16-White 1387 20-16 50% 16 TX
33010 BG's G-Force 15-Black 1386 0-4 0% 15 IA
33011 West Hants Wizards 14-Girls 1386 2-6 25% 14
33012 Offspeed Volleyball 14-Black 1386 2-6 25% 14
33013 Madfrog East 12-Diamond 1386 12-18 36% 12
33014 Cove 13 1386 9-15 38% 13
33015 Gold Coast 12-1 1386 17-12 59% 12 FL
33016 913Athletics 15-3 1386 0-4 0% 15 KS
33017 1FVBC 15-1 national 1386 0-7 0% 15 NV
33018 Independent 11-Knight 1386 0-3 0% 11 IN
33019 Tamales Volleyball Club 18-1 1386 0-4 0% 18 MO
33020 GVA 16-Burgundy 1386 0-3 0% 16 PR
33021 Thunder 15-S 1386 0-4 0% 15 OH
33022 ReignVBA 15-1 1386 0-4 0% 15 CO
33023 Club V South TA 15-Anna 1386 0-4 0% 15 UT
33024 Club Ace 15-Black 1386 0-4 0% 15 AZ
33025 LC Elite 18-1 1386 1-7 13% 18 WA
33026 603 United 14-Seacoast national 1386 1-6 14% 14 NH
33027 NWFS 17-1 1386 1-6 14% 17 GA
33028 Attack 10-Orange 1386 1-5 17% 10 IL
33029 913Athletics 13-2 1386 1-4 17% 13 KS
33030 Hitt 12-Lyndie 1386 1-4 20% 12 MI
33031 RVBC 12-Red 1386 1-4 20% 12 PA
33032 Vibe 12-Eva 1386 1-4 20% 12 GA
33033 Mesa Juniors VBCO 13-Black 1386 2-8 20% 13 CO
33034 CJV 11-Local black 1386 1-4 20% 11 NC
33035 Munciana 11-L kunoichis coral 1386 1-4 20% 11 IN
33036 Champion 15-R purple 1386 1-4 20% 15 NC
33037 Tstreet 16-Celina 1386 1-4 20% 16 CA
33038 nmdiggers 16-1 1386 1-4 20% 16 MI
33039 HIC 16-R aimee 1386 1-3 20% 16 UT
33040 Team Atlantis 11-Cavs 1386 1-4 20% 11 OH
33041 Northern Elite 18 Northern Elite 1386 1-4 20% 18 NM
33042 SISU VB 17-1 1386 9-34 21% 17 MA
33043 IOWA ALLIANCE 15-Pink 1386 2-7 22% 15 IA
33044 ACAD 17-Blue 1386 11-40 22% 17 NY
33045 VAVA 14-1 1386 3-10 23% 14 VA
33046 Cayuga Lakers 16 1386 3-7 23% 16 NY
33047 Pono 14-2 megan 1386 11-26 27% 14 TX
33048 Edge Elite 15-Gold 1386 3-8 27% 15 PA
33049 E3VB 11 Empower 1386 5-13 28% 11 NM
33050 A4 Volley 18-Aaron 1386 10-25 29% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.