Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 606 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30251 WCJ 11-1 1413 9-12 39% 11 TX
30252 NOALL 17-Black 1413 8-15 33% 17 ND
30253 Nova 15-Premier one 1413 5-8 38% 15 CT
30254 CVVC 14-Annie 1413 3-4 38% 14 UT
30255 UVC 11-Penny 1413 4-7 36% 11 IL
30256 C3VB 16-1 1413 18-20 47% 16 NH
30257 Fulmont VBC 14-1 1413 21-21 45% 14 NY
30258 Iowa Vibe 18-Ombre 1413 2-3 40% 18 IA
30259 LCVC 16-Black 1413 7-6 54% 16 IN
30260 G3VB 15-2 1413 20-31 39% 15 OR
30261 NW Jrs 15-Navy 1413 19-25 43% 15 WA
30262 Warren Sixpack 16-White 1413 21-16 57% 16 NJ
30263 316VBC 18-White 1413 6-10 38% 18 KS
30264 SKC 18-Black 1413 8-12 40% 18 KS
30265 1 Flight 15-2 national 1413 24-29 45% 15 OR
30266 NFW Ryze 17 16.2 Elite 1413 1-3 20% 17 TX
30267 Lions Starved Rock 14-White 1413 22-23 49% 14 IL
30268 Rose City 15-2 1413 4-6 40% 15 MI
30269 Vibe Girls 14-Joey 1413 2-3 40% 14 VT
30270 GSL JO VB 10-2 1413 1-5 17% 10 MN
30271 American 13-Blue 1413 32-32 49% 13 VA
30272 Momentum One 12-Tsunami 1413 12-15 44% 12 WA
30273 SVC 14 1413 0-3 0% 14 FL
30274 SoCal Legends 17-Nike 1413 21-31 40% 17 CA
30275 St. George Aces 13-Jes 1413 1-3 25% 13 UT
30276 Core Elite Volleyball 12 12U REGIONAL (BY) 1413 5-8 33% 12 LA
30277 GSL JO 10-1 1413 0-3 0% 10 MN
30278 Club Falcons 16-1 1413 1-3 25% 16 MN
30279 La Jolla 16-1 noah 1413 19-22 46% 16 CA
30280 913Athletics 14-3 1413 1-4 20% 14 KS
30281 High Line 12-Aspiring pnk 1413 12-16 43% 12 PA
30282 Synergy 13-Avalanche 1413 22-31 41% 13 PA
30283 575 13-Lpn gavin 1413 30-43 41% 13 GA
30284 TA'AHINE VBC - HI 18 1413 6-7 46% 18 HI
30285 PRESSURE 16 1413 14-18 44% 16
30286 Tigresas 18-1 1413 2-4 33% 18 PR
30287 Rise Oc 14-Helen 1413 14-15 48% 14 CA
30288 Athena 14-Black 1413 2-4 33% 14 CA
30289 CMASS Academy 16-Blue 1413 0-3 0% 16 MA
30290 Extreme 16-Purple 1413 13-15 46% 16 MA
30291 KC Power 11-4 1413 3-3 50% 11 KS
30292 Apex NW 12-Elevate 1413 2-3 40% 12 WA
30293 METRO Elite 15-Blue 1413 7-9 44% 15 GA
30294 TKVBC 15-Aces premier 1413 29-26 53% 15 GA
30295 Alliance 14-Fire 1413 7-8 44% 14 MA
30296 UVA 11-Tim jr 1413 0-3 0% 11 LA
30297 Rise 15 Regional 1413 14-19 42% 15 CA
30298 DBQ Elite 17-1 1413 2-5 25% 17 IA
30299 Ama Xtreme 12-Outlaws 1413 1-3 25% 12
30300 Bedford Blizzard 14-Navy 1413 1-6 14% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.