Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 607 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30301 NSTVB 15-Starrb 1413 0-5 0% 15
30302 FL HYPE 15-Blue 1413 1-4 20% 15 FL
30303 Winona Destruction 13-K 1413 1-3 20% 13 MO
30304 SMASH Volleyball 14-White 1413 2-6 25% 14 MA
30305 Fairfield 14-Navy 1413 1-3 25% 14 CT
30306 Michio Chicago 12-Cubs 1413 1-3 25% 12 IL
30307 elevation elite volleyball club 18 elevationelitevbc 1413 2-5 29% 18 CA
30308 Victory 11-Nat'l black 1413 3-6 30% 11 TX
30309 ONEVA 15-1 1413 8-18 31% 15 KS
30310 MOVSelect 13-White 1412 1-3 25% 13 OH
30311 AVB Fire 12-Black 1412 1-4 20% 12 MN
30312 St. Charles Heat 13-1 1412 1-4 20% 13 MN
30313 Elite Juniors 13-3 1412 3-6 33% 13 OH
30314 Dominate 14-1 1412 9-15 32% 14 TX
30315 LS Thunder 14-Blue 1412 6-6 40% 14
30316 DIG 11-A rachael 1412 3-6 30% 11 TX
30317 PC Elite 13-1 1412 3-7 27% 13 TX
30318 Coqui Coast 17 1412 5-14 26% 17 AL
30319 CMASS Academy 14-Blue 1412 1-2 33% 14 MA
30320 Yessah 14-Brown 1412 2-6 25% 14 NV
30321 Mission 12-Black 1412 3-6 33% 12 IL
30322 Sunset West 13-Stingrays 1412 0-2 0% 13 NE
30323 A5 12-Riley 1412 22-22 50% 12 GA
30324 Inferno 10 Firestorm 1412 8-9 47% 10 IL
30325 OPVBC 14 Surge 1412 19-29 40% 14 WA
30326 Next Level 16-Kristi 1412 9-6 60% 16 MI
30327 UVC 14-Will 1412 6-6 50% 14 IL
30328 SVE 13-1 1412 24-31 44% 13 GA
30329 Mineral Area 12 Fire 1412 7-13 33% 12 MO
30330 SA Raiders 15-1 1412 15-15 48% 15 TX
30331 St. Joe Storm 13-1 1412 4-8 33% 13 MO
30332 MVA 15-Regional black 1412 12-15 41% 15 MD
30333 Innerlight VC 14 GOLD 1412 20-21 49% 14 TN
30334 Hollywood 16-3 heat 1412 4-8 33% 16 OH
30335 Tribe 16-Kincheloe 1412 1-3 25% 16 OH
30336 Flyers 13-Hfl-gracie 1412 1-3 20% 13 TX
30337 PU5H VBC 16 1412 18-19 49% 16 KY
30338 MAVA 10-GreatWhite 1412 19-25 43% 10 KY
30339 LAVA 17-Black n 1412 21-26 45% 17 OH
30340 Metro Volleyball Club 12-East 1412 19-21 44% 12 DC
30341 OMNI 15-Prime 1412 25-28 47% 15 CA
30342 Shockwave 15-1 1412 7-8 47% 15 MI
30343 TVC 14-A-s 1412 17-24 41% 14 FL
30344 Metro Performance 17-2 1412 4-9 31% 17
30345 Club Fusion 14-2 1412 2-3 40% 14 MI
30346 Pgh Elite 14 Silver 1412 11-12 48% 14 PA
30347 KC Power 14-5 1412 10-10 48% 14 KS
30348 A5 Gwinnett 15-Colin 1412 18-34 35% 15 GA
30349 LRJ 13-Premier 1412 19-23 45% 13 AR
30350 RPT 18-Elite 1412 4-6 40% 18 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.