2025-2026 Season — Page 605 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30201 | CARDINALS 13 | 1414 | 3-8 | 25% | 13 | IA |
| 30202 | DENVER JUNIORS 12-Caitlin | 1413 | 11-12 | 48% | 12 | CO |
| 30203 | Five-Four-Zero Volleyball Academy 15 16 Victory (OD) | 1413 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | VA |
| 30204 | RVBC 16-Red | 1413 | 2-5 | 20% | 16 | PA |
| 30205 | Capital Ice 12 | 1413 | 20-30 | 40% | 12 | WA |
| 30206 | MemphisVBAcademy 15-Black | 1413 | 20-22 | 48% | 15 | MS |
| 30207 | GCVBC 15-Young/price | 1413 | 26-25 | 51% | 15 | OH |
| 30208 | Apex OK 14-1 | 1413 | 1-2 | 25% | 14 | OK |
| 30209 | Club Momentum 13-Purple | 1413 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | MN |
| 30210 | Metrowest VBC 13-Peach | 1413 | 11-10 | 48% | 13 | MA |
| 30211 | Tiger Attack 16 | 1413 | 0-2 | 0% | 16 | NE |
| 30212 | KSA 17-Red | 1413 | 25-31 | 45% | 17 | KY |
| 30213 | RRS of MS 15-1 hays | 1413 | 6-10 | 33% | 15 | MS |
| 30214 | TORCH 13-Stephanie | 1413 | 17-28 | 38% | 13 | CA |
| 30215 | TKVBC 13-Mustangs national 2 | 1413 | 5-12 | 29% | 13 | GA |
| 30216 | A-Town Volley 12 | 1413 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | AR |
| 30217 | Rapid Fire 17-White | 1413 | 10-17 | 37% | 17 | IL |
| 30218 | Juggernaut 16-Regional1 | 1413 | 19-21 | 48% | 16 | CO |
| 30219 | TNT 15 Tower | 1413 | 22-21 | 51% | 15 | PA |
| 30220 | Bay Area Eagles 18-1 jhunel | 1413 | 6-19 | 24% | 18 | CA |
| 30221 | PYA 12-R white | 1413 | 12-13 | 48% | 12 | AL |
| 30222 | Ne Jrs 15-Red | 1413 | 15-22 | 41% | 15 | NE |
| 30223 | Webo 10-5s alyssa/mallory | 1413 | 3-5 | 38% | 10 | IN |
| 30224 | Jellys 16-Black | 1413 | 25-24 | 51% | 16 | FL |
| 30225 | KC Force 13-Black | 1413 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | MO |
| 30226 | Club North Volleyball KC 13-5 | 1413 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 30227 | Capital Force 13-1 | 1413 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | MO |
| 30228 | Wisconsin Elite 13-Red | 1413 | 30-34 | 47% | 13 | WI |
| 30229 | SWVBC 15-White | 1413 | 18-20 | 47% | 15 | WI |
| 30230 | AVC CLE 15-Navy | 1413 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | OH |
| 30231 | OCTANE HUSKIES 10 | 1413 | 0-4 | 0% | 10 | NY |
| 30232 | 1W 16-Silver | 1413 | 7-10 | 41% | 16 | WI |
| 30233 | PIRATAS ADN 11-1 | 1413 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | PR |
| 30234 | Sanford Sports 11-Red | 1413 | 10-20 | 33% | 11 | SD |
| 30235 | Diamond Elite 15-Purple | 1413 | 30-45 | 37% | 15 | NY |
| 30236 | HJV 12-Adidas | 1413 | 6-10 | 38% | 12 | TX |
| 30237 | OMNI Volleyball Club 12 OMNI White | 1413 | 9-11 | 45% | 12 | CA |
| 30238 | EU 14-Silver | 1413 | 17-28 | 38% | 14 | IN |
| 30239 | W Pride 13-3 | 1413 | 5-7 | 42% | 13 | NY |
| 30240 | Iowa Matrix 16-Zelos | 1413 | 1-5 | 11% | 16 | IA |
| 30241 | LC Spark 12 LC Spark Fire (SU) | 1413 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | NM |
| 30242 | SVBC 17-1 | 1413 | 6-7 | 46% | 17 | ID |
| 30243 | Sideout 18 | 1413 | 7-10 | 41% | 18 | WA |
| 30244 | Aspire Volleyball Club 12 Aspire Rising Black (NC) | 1413 | 13-12 | 52% | 12 | |
| 30245 | TCVA 13-Green adidas | 1413 | 16-24 | 40% | 13 | TX |
| 30246 | STL Crossfire 17 SR1 | 1413 | 17-24 | 41% | 17 | MO |
| 30247 | Garretson 12 | 1413 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | SD |
| 30248 | Kamuela VBC 14-Black | 1413 | 4-8 | 33% | 14 | HI |
| 30249 | Ascent 12-2 | 1413 | 15-17 | 41% | 12 | MT |
| 30250 | Munciana 14-R raptors | 1413 | 9-11 | 45% | 14 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.