Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 605 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30201 CARDINALS 13 1414 3-8 25% 13 IA
30202 DENVER JUNIORS 12-Caitlin 1413 11-12 48% 12 CO
30203 Five-Four-Zero Volleyball Academy 15 16 Victory (OD) 1413 3-4 43% 15 VA
30204 RVBC 16-Red 1413 2-5 20% 16 PA
30205 Capital Ice 12 1413 20-30 40% 12 WA
30206 MemphisVBAcademy 15-Black 1413 20-22 48% 15 MS
30207 GCVBC 15-Young/price 1413 26-25 51% 15 OH
30208 Apex OK 14-1 1413 1-2 25% 14 OK
30209 Club Momentum 13-Purple 1413 1-4 20% 13 MN
30210 Metrowest VBC 13-Peach 1413 11-10 48% 13 MA
30211 Tiger Attack 16 1413 0-2 0% 16 NE
30212 KSA 17-Red 1413 25-31 45% 17 KY
30213 RRS of MS 15-1 hays 1413 6-10 33% 15 MS
30214 TORCH 13-Stephanie 1413 17-28 38% 13 CA
30215 TKVBC 13-Mustangs national 2 1413 5-12 29% 13 GA
30216 A-Town Volley 12 1413 1-3 25% 12 AR
30217 Rapid Fire 17-White 1413 10-17 37% 17 IL
30218 Juggernaut 16-Regional1 1413 19-21 48% 16 CO
30219 TNT 15 Tower 1413 22-21 51% 15 PA
30220 Bay Area Eagles 18-1 jhunel 1413 6-19 24% 18 CA
30221 PYA 12-R white 1413 12-13 48% 12 AL
30222 Ne Jrs 15-Red 1413 15-22 41% 15 NE
30223 Webo 10-5s alyssa/mallory 1413 3-5 38% 10 IN
30224 Jellys 16-Black 1413 25-24 51% 16 FL
30225 KC Force 13-Black 1413 1-4 20% 13 MO
30226 Club North Volleyball KC 13-5 1413 2-2 50% 13 MO
30227 Capital Force 13-1 1413 2-3 40% 13 MO
30228 Wisconsin Elite 13-Red 1413 30-34 47% 13 WI
30229 SWVBC 15-White 1413 18-20 47% 15 WI
30230 AVC CLE 15-Navy 1413 5-6 45% 15 OH
30231 OCTANE HUSKIES 10 1413 0-4 0% 10 NY
30232 1W 16-Silver 1413 7-10 41% 16 WI
30233 PIRATAS ADN 11-1 1413 1-3 25% 11 PR
30234 Sanford Sports 11-Red 1413 10-20 33% 11 SD
30235 Diamond Elite 15-Purple 1413 30-45 37% 15 NY
30236 HJV 12-Adidas 1413 6-10 38% 12 TX
30237 OMNI Volleyball Club 12 OMNI White 1413 9-11 45% 12 CA
30238 EU 14-Silver 1413 17-28 38% 14 IN
30239 W Pride 13-3 1413 5-7 42% 13 NY
30240 Iowa Matrix 16-Zelos 1413 1-5 11% 16 IA
30241 LC Spark 12 LC Spark Fire (SU) 1413 0-4 0% 12 NM
30242 SVBC 17-1 1413 6-7 46% 17 ID
30243 Sideout 18 1413 7-10 41% 18 WA
30244 Aspire Volleyball Club 12 Aspire Rising Black (NC) 1413 13-12 52% 12
30245 TCVA 13-Green adidas 1413 16-24 40% 13 TX
30246 STL Crossfire 17 SR1 1413 17-24 41% 17 MO
30247 Garretson 12 1413 0-2 0% 12 SD
30248 Kamuela VBC 14-Black 1413 4-8 33% 14 HI
30249 Ascent 12-2 1413 15-17 41% 12 MT
30250 Munciana 14-R raptors 1413 9-11 45% 14 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.