2025-2026 Season — Page 604 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30151 | Midway Elite 16-Black | 1414 | 28-29 | 49% | 16 | IL |
| 30152 | 603 United 15-National | 1414 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | NH |
| 30153 | MPCG-FS 12-Blue | 1414 | 1-3 | 20% | 12 | ND |
| 30154 | Cangrejeras 14-Dimar | 1414 | 9-9 | 50% | 14 | PR |
| 30155 | Momentum 18-2 | 1414 | 5-4 | 56% | 18 | IN |
| 30156 | 575 16-Lpnb abbey | 1414 | 25-45 | 36% | 16 | GA |
| 30157 | NHVB Youth-Purple 12 | 1414 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | MN |
| 30158 | AVC 13-Hannah | 1414 | 15-18 | 42% | 13 | TX |
| 30159 | Impact 14-Mira | 1414 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | MI |
| 30160 | AVA 16-National | 1414 | 16-25 | 39% | 16 | AL |
| 30161 | Rise 12-Purple | 1414 | 17-15 | 53% | 12 | CO |
| 30162 | LevelUp 14-1 | 1414 | 8-7 | 44% | 14 | MS |
| 30163 | Hanover VC 14-1 | 1414 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | PA |
| 30164 | 207VBC 18-1 | 1414 | 24-25 | 49% | 18 | ME |
| 30165 | Ho'opa Hawaii 12-S | 1414 | 4-6 | 40% | 12 | |
| 30166 | RRIV 16 Regional | 1414 | 17-23 | 40% | 16 | ND |
| 30167 | Princeton 14-3 regional | 1414 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | NJ |
| 30168 | SWI3D 15-White | 1414 | 5-10 | 31% | 15 | NE |
| 30169 | MAVA 17-GreatWhite | 1414 | 23-22 | 51% | 17 | KY |
| 30170 | NL 14-Gold | 1414 | 22-19 | 54% | 14 | MI |
| 30171 | Ohio County Flare 13 Ohio County Flare (PR) | 1414 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | KY |
| 30172 | Apex VBTC 16-Peak white | 1414 | 7-4 | 64% | 16 | OH |
| 30173 | NW Elite 14-7 gray | 1414 | 14-21 | 38% | 14 | OR |
| 30174 | Dead Frog 14-Laney | 1414 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MI |
| 30175 | CMASS Academy 16-White | 1414 | 1-2 | 33% | 16 | MA |
| 30176 | Avoli 16-F vitin | 1414 | 8-13 | 38% | 16 | PR |
| 30177 | PL Extreme Volleyball 14-1 | 1414 | 9-17 | 35% | 14 | MN |
| 30178 | Boss CLE 10-1 | 1414 | 4-9 | 31% | 10 | OH |
| 30179 | RAS 15-1 | 1414 | 21-16 | 55% | 15 | IL |
| 30180 | Academy 13-Blue | 1414 | 10-20 | 26% | 13 | DE |
| 30181 | Titan Premier 14-Tori | 1414 | 6-7 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 30182 | Southland Aces VBC 18-1 | 1414 | 5-8 | 29% | 18 | MO |
| 30183 | 305VBC 15-S leslie | 1414 | 30-28 | 52% | 15 | FL |
| 30184 | Eden Prairie 14-Black | 1414 | 11-12 | 48% | 14 | MN |
| 30185 | Vegas Volley 16-1 | 1414 | 18-33 | 35% | 16 | NV |
| 30186 | 805 Elite 15-West coast | 1414 | 5-9 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 30187 | NIVA 13-Green | 1414 | 11-14 | 44% | 13 | IN |
| 30188 | Varnish Juniors 16 | 1414 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | ID |
| 30189 | SEVA 17-White makayla | 1414 | 3-3 | 50% | 17 | NC |
| 30190 | Fr Challenge Elite 15-Mag | 1414 | 17-22 | 40% | 15 | TX |
| 30191 | Platinum 14-Ridge | 1414 | 8-15 | 31% | 14 | UT |
| 30192 | SVC 15-2 | 1414 | 28-38 | 42% | 15 | NY |
| 30193 | Club Cactus 14-White | 1414 | 16-13 | 55% | 14 | AZ |
| 30194 | IJV 14-Green | 1414 | 13-9 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 30195 | Philly Starlings 16 | 1414 | 4-5 | 44% | 16 | PA |
| 30196 | SPRING Mini 407 13-Sabrina | 1414 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | FL |
| 30197 | Victorium 14-Black | 1414 | 26-29 | 47% | 14 | AZ |
| 30198 | Alpha Omega Volleyball G13-2 | 1414 | 2-9 | 15% | 13 | MO |
| 30199 | MTNVC 16U | 1414 | 13-13 | 50% | 16 | NC |
| 30200 | Rise 14-N | 1414 | 40-47 | 46% | 14 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.