Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 604 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30151 Midway Elite 16-Black 1414 28-29 49% 16 IL
30152 603 United 15-National 1414 2-6 25% 15 NH
30153 MPCG-FS 12-Blue 1414 1-3 20% 12 ND
30154 Cangrejeras 14-Dimar 1414 9-9 50% 14 PR
30155 Momentum 18-2 1414 5-4 56% 18 IN
30156 575 16-Lpnb abbey 1414 25-45 36% 16 GA
30157 NHVB Youth-Purple 12 1414 1-3 25% 12 MN
30158 AVC 13-Hannah 1414 15-18 42% 13 TX
30159 Impact 14-Mira 1414 17-12 59% 14 MI
30160 AVA 16-National 1414 16-25 39% 16 AL
30161 Rise 12-Purple 1414 17-15 53% 12 CO
30162 LevelUp 14-1 1414 8-7 44% 14 MS
30163 Hanover VC 14-1 1414 4-6 40% 14 PA
30164 207VBC 18-1 1414 24-25 49% 18 ME
30165 Ho'opa Hawaii 12-S 1414 4-6 40% 12
30166 RRIV 16 Regional 1414 17-23 40% 16 ND
30167 Princeton 14-3 regional 1414 2-4 33% 14 NJ
30168 SWI3D 15-White 1414 5-10 31% 15 NE
30169 MAVA 17-GreatWhite 1414 23-22 51% 17 KY
30170 NL 14-Gold 1414 22-19 54% 14 MI
30171 Ohio County Flare 13 Ohio County Flare (PR) 1414 1-3 25% 13 KY
30172 Apex VBTC 16-Peak white 1414 7-4 64% 16 OH
30173 NW Elite 14-7 gray 1414 14-21 38% 14 OR
30174 Dead Frog 14-Laney 1414 2-3 40% 14 MI
30175 CMASS Academy 16-White 1414 1-2 33% 16 MA
30176 Avoli 16-F vitin 1414 8-13 38% 16 PR
30177 PL Extreme Volleyball 14-1 1414 9-17 35% 14 MN
30178 Boss CLE 10-1 1414 4-9 31% 10 OH
30179 RAS 15-1 1414 21-16 55% 15 IL
30180 Academy 13-Blue 1414 10-20 26% 13 DE
30181 Titan Premier 14-Tori 1414 6-7 46% 14 CA
30182 Southland Aces VBC 18-1 1414 5-8 29% 18 MO
30183 305VBC 15-S leslie 1414 30-28 52% 15 FL
30184 Eden Prairie 14-Black 1414 11-12 48% 14 MN
30185 Vegas Volley 16-1 1414 18-33 35% 16 NV
30186 805 Elite 15-West coast 1414 5-9 36% 15 CA
30187 NIVA 13-Green 1414 11-14 44% 13 IN
30188 Varnish Juniors 16 1414 1-3 25% 16 ID
30189 SEVA 17-White makayla 1414 3-3 50% 17 NC
30190 Fr Challenge Elite 15-Mag 1414 17-22 40% 15 TX
30191 Platinum 14-Ridge 1414 8-15 31% 14 UT
30192 SVC 15-2 1414 28-38 42% 15 NY
30193 Club Cactus 14-White 1414 16-13 55% 14 AZ
30194 IJV 14-Green 1414 13-9 54% 14 IL
30195 Philly Starlings 16 1414 4-5 44% 16 PA
30196 SPRING Mini 407 13-Sabrina 1414 1-3 25% 13 FL
30197 Victorium 14-Black 1414 26-29 47% 14 AZ
30198 Alpha Omega Volleyball G13-2 1414 2-9 15% 13 MO
30199 MTNVC 16U 1414 13-13 50% 16 NC
30200 Rise 14-N 1414 40-47 46% 14 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.