2025-2026 Season — Page 603 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30101 | eteva 15 | 1415 | 1-3 | 20% | 15 | |
| 30102 | Volley Pro 13-Black lindsey | 1415 | 2-6 | 25% | 13 | TX |
| 30103 | Tenacity 18-Hp | 1415 | 17-25 | 40% | 18 | TN |
| 30104 | ARAA 12-Black | 1415 | 1-5 | 17% | 12 | MN |
| 30105 | BVBA 14-S | 1415 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | NE |
| 30106 | Bemidji 12-Nicole/casey | 1415 | 1-3 | 20% | 12 | ND |
| 30107 | LVA U17 | 1415 | 15-54 | 21% | 17 | VA |
| 30108 | Defensa 13-Eerik | 1415 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | ON |
| 30109 | HHVBC 16-1g | 1415 | 2-6 | 22% | 16 | IA |
| 30110 | MILTON EDGE 17 Milton Edge Steel | 1414 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | |
| 30111 | NPJO 12-White | 1414 | 6-6 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 30112 | BC Rise 12-Adidas | 1414 | 5-9 | 36% | 12 | TX |
| 30113 | QC Panthers 12-Blue | 1414 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | IA |
| 30114 | adidas DYNASTY 10-2 | 1414 | 2-2 | 33% | 10 | KS |
| 30115 | Hartford VBC 13-1 | 1414 | 15-15 | 50% | 13 | WI |
| 30116 | NYC Volley Verse 12-1 | 1414 | 12-22 | 35% | 12 | NY |
| 30117 | LIVBC Girls 14-Gold | 1414 | 13-19 | 41% | 14 | NY |
| 30118 | North AL 14-Molly | 1414 | 1-3 | 20% | 14 | AL |
| 30119 | Black Hills Juniors NH 15-2 | 1414 | 5-10 | 33% | 15 | WY |
| 30120 | Gonzales Revolution 17-1 | 1414 | 8-7 | 53% | 17 | TX |
| 30121 | SFSVC 13-1 joylynn | 1414 | 16-15 | 52% | 13 | NM |
| 30122 | Metro VBC 15-White | 1414 | 24-26 | 48% | 15 | IN |
| 30123 | 314 VBC 14-Regional - gandolfo | 1414 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | MO |
| 30124 | Beach Cities 11-Smack | 1414 | 13-15 | 46% | 11 | CA |
| 30125 | Victory 14-Elite gray | 1414 | 10-24 | 27% | 14 | TX |
| 30126 | AVA 14-Regional | 1414 | 12-17 | 41% | 14 | AL |
| 30127 | LVCWY 13-1 | 1414 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | WY |
| 30128 | 912 Volleyball Academy 17 | 1414 | 7-12 | 37% | 17 | GA |
| 30129 | 2025/26 Storm 18-Blues | 1414 | 11-12 | 48% | 18 | WI |
| 30130 | Oly Reign 12-1 | 1414 | 2-5 | 29% | 12 | WA |
| 30131 | Sedalia Stealth VBC 14-1 | 1414 | 2-2 | 40% | 14 | MO |
| 30132 | 540 VB 16 Navy | 1414 | 15-20 | 43% | 16 | VA |
| 30133 | SIVA 12-1 | 1414 | 3-4 | 43% | 12 | PR |
| 30134 | WWVA 14-2 nighthawks | 1414 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | CO |
| 30135 | Village Juniors 14 | 1414 | 5-9 | 33% | 14 | AR |
| 30136 | Tsunami 14-3r | 1414 | 22-15 | 59% | 14 | GA |
| 30137 | Alpha Performance Volleyball Club 12 Alpha Purple | 1414 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | KY |
| 30138 | Vail Peak 14U Navy | 1414 | 20-22 | 48% | 14 | CO |
| 30139 | Impact Legends 16-Blue | 1414 | 23-19 | 55% | 16 | IN |
| 30140 | Southside Volleyball 15-1 | 1414 | 10-7 | 59% | 15 | VA |
| 30141 | CHOSEN SPOT 17 | 1414 | 6-9 | 30% | 17 | NY |
| 30142 | DC Volleyball Club 13-Red | 1414 | 0-2 | 0% | 13 | IA |
| 30143 | FSJ 15-National | 1414 | 19-23 | 45% | 15 | AR |
| 30144 | PI'OPI'O BEARS 16-Moku | 1414 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | HI |
| 30145 | Aces 15-Sage | 1414 | 3-6 | 23% | 15 | UT |
| 30146 | DIGS 14-Black | 1414 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | MN |
| 30147 | City Beach 17-Green | 1414 | 26-36 | 42% | 17 | CA |
| 30148 | Wichita Legacy 14-2 | 1414 | 3-7 | 27% | 14 | KS |
| 30149 | Madison Ignite 17-Royal | 1414 | 18-28 | 39% | 17 | WI |
| 30150 | NorCal Volleyball Club 12 NorCal Juniors Jenn 3/4 | 1414 | 9-11 | 45% | 12 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.