Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 603 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30101 eteva 15 1415 1-3 20% 15
30102 Volley Pro 13-Black lindsey 1415 2-6 25% 13 TX
30103 Tenacity 18-Hp 1415 17-25 40% 18 TN
30104 ARAA 12-Black 1415 1-5 17% 12 MN
30105 BVBA 14-S 1415 1-4 20% 14 NE
30106 Bemidji 12-Nicole/casey 1415 1-3 20% 12 ND
30107 LVA U17 1415 15-54 21% 17 VA
30108 Defensa 13-Eerik 1415 1-4 20% 13 ON
30109 HHVBC 16-1g 1415 2-6 22% 16 IA
30110 MILTON EDGE 17 Milton Edge Steel 1414 2-3 40% 17
30111 NPJO 12-White 1414 6-6 50% 12 MN
30112 BC Rise 12-Adidas 1414 5-9 36% 12 TX
30113 QC Panthers 12-Blue 1414 2-3 40% 12 IA
30114 adidas DYNASTY 10-2 1414 2-2 33% 10 KS
30115 Hartford VBC 13-1 1414 15-15 50% 13 WI
30116 NYC Volley Verse 12-1 1414 12-22 35% 12 NY
30117 LIVBC Girls 14-Gold 1414 13-19 41% 14 NY
30118 North AL 14-Molly 1414 1-3 20% 14 AL
30119 Black Hills Juniors NH 15-2 1414 5-10 33% 15 WY
30120 Gonzales Revolution 17-1 1414 8-7 53% 17 TX
30121 SFSVC 13-1 joylynn 1414 16-15 52% 13 NM
30122 Metro VBC 15-White 1414 24-26 48% 15 IN
30123 314 VBC 14-Regional - gandolfo 1414 4-5 44% 14 MO
30124 Beach Cities 11-Smack 1414 13-15 46% 11 CA
30125 Victory 14-Elite gray 1414 10-24 27% 14 TX
30126 AVA 14-Regional 1414 12-17 41% 14 AL
30127 LVCWY 13-1 1414 2-4 33% 13 WY
30128 912 Volleyball Academy 17 1414 7-12 37% 17 GA
30129 2025/26 Storm 18-Blues 1414 11-12 48% 18 WI
30130 Oly Reign 12-1 1414 2-5 29% 12 WA
30131 Sedalia Stealth VBC 14-1 1414 2-2 40% 14 MO
30132 540 VB 16 Navy 1414 15-20 43% 16 VA
30133 SIVA 12-1 1414 3-4 43% 12 PR
30134 WWVA 14-2 nighthawks 1414 1-3 25% 14 CO
30135 Village Juniors 14 1414 5-9 33% 14 AR
30136 Tsunami 14-3r 1414 22-15 59% 14 GA
30137 Alpha Performance Volleyball Club 12 Alpha Purple 1414 2-3 40% 12 KY
30138 Vail Peak 14U Navy 1414 20-22 48% 14 CO
30139 Impact Legends 16-Blue 1414 23-19 55% 16 IN
30140 Southside Volleyball 15-1 1414 10-7 59% 15 VA
30141 CHOSEN SPOT 17 1414 6-9 30% 17 NY
30142 DC Volleyball Club 13-Red 1414 0-2 0% 13 IA
30143 FSJ 15-National 1414 19-23 45% 15 AR
30144 PI'OPI'O BEARS 16-Moku 1414 1-3 25% 16 HI
30145 Aces 15-Sage 1414 3-6 23% 15 UT
30146 DIGS 14-Black 1414 1-3 25% 14 MN
30147 City Beach 17-Green 1414 26-36 42% 17 CA
30148 Wichita Legacy 14-2 1414 3-7 27% 14 KS
30149 Madison Ignite 17-Royal 1414 18-28 39% 17 WI
30150 NorCal Volleyball Club 12 NorCal Juniors Jenn 3/4 1414 9-11 45% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.