2025-2026 Season — Page 602 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30051 | LCVC 14-Black | 1415 | 5-6 | 45% | 14 | IN |
| 30052 | Spartan Club 17 | 1415 | 7-9 | 44% | 17 | ID |
| 30053 | Impulse 14-Black | 1415 | 10-8 | 50% | 14 | IN |
| 30054 | Storm 12-Ray | 1415 | 14-15 | 48% | 12 | CA |
| 30055 | TEVC 14-Purple | 1415 | 22-26 | 46% | 14 | TN |
| 30056 | Resilient Volleyball Academy 11-Navy | 1415 | 12-16 | 43% | 11 | FL |
| 30057 | Zuma Bay 15 Riptide | 1415 | 16-23 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 30058 | PL Extreme Volleyball 14-2 | 1415 | 12-14 | 46% | 14 | MN |
| 30059 | NHVB 14-2 | 1415 | 5-11 | 31% | 14 | MN |
| 30060 | Hartford VBC 16-1 | 1415 | 30-36 | 45% | 16 | WI |
| 30061 | Colorado Valkyries 12-Gold | 1415 | 13-19 | 41% | 12 | CO |
| 30062 | Mean Green 12-2 | 1415 | 6-11 | 30% | 12 | TX |
| 30063 | LAVA 18-Rachael | 1415 | 5-8 | 38% | 18 | NC |
| 30064 | HP Illinois 14-Maroon | 1415 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | MO |
| 30065 | VIBE 12-White state | 1415 | 12-15 | 44% | 12 | FL |
| 30066 | Reign Volleyball 12-Boca | 1415 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | FL |
| 30067 | VVA-Butte 18-Kk | 1415 | 17-19 | 44% | 18 | MT |
| 30068 | Htown 12 | 1415 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | IN |
| 30069 | Gunners VBC 17 Gunners Crush | 1415 | 20-22 | 48% | 17 | AZ |
| 30070 | DVBC Defiance 14-S - taya | 1415 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | CO |
| 30071 | SSWolfpack 15-Deltas | 1415 | 12-22 | 35% | 15 | MA |
| 30072 | Independent 10-Immel | 1415 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | IN |
| 30073 | Orange Crush 13-Orange | 1415 | 3-5 | 33% | 13 | IA |
| 30074 | NORCO 15-Silver | 1415 | 16-18 | 47% | 15 | CO |
| 30075 | MSVC 17-Adidas sara | 1415 | 29-28 | 51% | 17 | FL |
| 30076 | SA Destination 15-1 | 1415 | 13-15 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 30077 | 797 Empire 15-S | 1415 | 9-12 | 43% | 15 | TX |
| 30078 | Tsunami 12-1a | 1415 | 28-35 | 44% | 12 | GA |
| 30079 | Heartland Big Lake 11-White | 1415 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | MN |
| 30080 | UNO 12-Spring blue | 1415 | 3-5 | 33% | 12 | IL |
| 30081 | Lanier 13-National melinda | 1415 | 6-10 | 38% | 13 | GA |
| 30082 | WCA 17-Pink | 1415 | 7-10 | 41% | 17 | NC |
| 30083 | ROCK VBC 13-1 | 1415 | 5-8 | 38% | 13 | WI |
| 30084 | Delta Juniors 13 | 1415 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | CO |
| 30085 | Rise 15-1 (NO) | 1415 | 7-6 | 54% | 15 | MN |
| 30086 | Alliance 16-Black | 1415 | 16-20 | 44% | 16 | NC |
| 30087 | IVC 14 Home | 1415 | 2-13 | 12% | 14 | AK |
| 30088 | KRATOS Volley Academy 13 Fairies | 1415 | 15-16 | 48% | 13 | CT |
| 30089 | Eagles 11 | 1415 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | MD |
| 30090 | PCS Club Volleyball 14-1 | 1415 | 6-8 | 33% | 14 | ND |
| 30091 | Club Tonka 18-1 | 1415 | 20-30 | 40% | 18 | MN |
| 30092 | VEVA 15 Premier | 1415 | 18-21 | 46% | 15 | FL |
| 30093 | 904 Elite Volleyball 15 15's | 1415 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | FL |
| 30094 | BWVC Mizuno 15 Elite | 1415 | 28-23 | 55% | 15 | FL |
| 30095 | Peak 15-Black | 1415 | 21-29 | 42% | 15 | FL |
| 30096 | UV 15-Scharese | 1415 | 12-16 | 35% | 15 | UT |
| 30097 | Club Fire 16-White | 1415 | 3-6 | 33% | 16 | MN |
| 30098 | Vital 16-3 white | 1415 | 34-43 | 44% | 16 | MN |
| 30099 | Wranglers VBC 18 | 1415 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | MI |
| 30100 | SWVC 11-Gr- haynes | 1415 | 2-6 | 22% | 11 | WY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.