Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 601 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
30001 Santa Barbara 14-Elite 1416 2-5 29% 14 CA
30002 MSVA 13-1 1416 8-14 33% 13 KY
30003 CALI 15-White north 1416 13-18 42% 15 NY
30004 LKN Volleyball Club 13 LKN Middle School (CR) (7) 1416 1-5 17% 13 NC
30005 MHVBC 14-2 1416 2-4 33% 14 CA
30006 SGV 18-Heat 1416 3-3 50% 18 GA
30007 VC Denver 11-Regional 1416 9-9 50% 11 CO
30008 Club Velocity 14-3 1416 10-8 56% 14 MN
30009 Lebanon VBC 17-1 elite 1416 7-10 41% 17 OR
30010 Houston Hazard 13-Black 1416 8-13 38% 13 TX
30011 NC Elite 16-Black 1416 14-23 38% 16 NC
30012 PRVA 15 Lightning 1415 0-3 0% 15 CA
30013 Southeast Premier 16 1415 4-8 29% 16 MO
30014 Midwest Juniors 11-2 1415 2-3 40% 11 KS
30015 River City 14 (EV) 1415 6-7 46% 14 WA
30016 Wisconsin Premier 14 Teal 1415 28-30 48% 14 WI
30017 Kansas Krush 14-1 1415 5-3 45% 14 KS
30018 MSVB 12-Blue festival 1415 4-6 40% 12 AK
30019 Katy United 16 Navy 1415 19-27 41% 16 TX
30020 Roots 16-4 mesquite 1415 20-23 47% 16 TX
30021 Limitless 13 Power 1415 9-9 50% 13 MD
30022 Ignite 14-Taylor 1415 6-10 30% 14 UT
30023 360 15-National red 1415 5-10 29% 15 NV
30024 GAVA 16-2 1415 2-6 25% 16 UT
30025 Radiate 16-Gold 1415 30-23 54% 16 UT
30026 Club 307 14-S 1415 5-7 33% 14 WY
30027 Top Flight 14-Xi sp 1415 2-3 40% 14 IL
30028 Southland Aces VBC 13-1 1415 2-2 40% 13 MO
30029 MGA 14-Eagles 1415 0-2 0% 14 MA
30030 Titanium 12-Silver 1415 4-6 31% 12 MO
30031 417 Juniors 12-2 1415 4-2 67% 12 MO
30032 CPVCA 15-1 1415 2-3 40% 15 AL
30033 LEGACY 13-State sebastian 1415 1-3 25% 13 NY
30034 Gold Rush 12-1 1415 7-16 28% 12 MT
30035 AV IMPACT 16-Joust 1415 21-20 51% 16 CA
30036 PREVAIL Girls 17-Purple 1415 11-15 42% 17 PA
30037 Adrenaline 15-Keiro 1415 14-28 33% 15 IA
30038 NorthShore 12-Burger 1415 3-7 30% 12 OH
30039 oe 12-1 1415 4-6 40% 12 OH
30040 Club Focus 12 Focus Sanders (OV) 1415 3-7 30% 12 OH
30041 Eclipse Volleyball Club 12 EVC-CROSSTY (OV) 1415 3-5 38% 12
30042 Northern Heat 12-2 1415 10-13 42% 12 MN
30043 GM Elevate 12-2 1415 3-6 33% 12 MN
30044 Top Flight 18-Psi 1415 2-3 40% 18 IL
30045 Elevate 18 Elite 1415 16-19 43% 18 IL
30046 Controlled Chaos 15 Controlled Chaos Black (KE) (12) 1415 1-4 13% 15 PA
30047 Loogootee Volleyball Club 13 Loogootee VC Black (HO) 1415 3-4 33% 13 IN
30048 Independent 13-Lundy 1415 0-3 0% 13 IN
30049 shockwave reading 13-3 1415 4-9 31% 13 PA
30050 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Thunder 1415 9-14 39% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.