Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 503 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25101 Durham Attack VBC 16 Durham Attack Cosmos (CA) 1460 2-4 33% 16 PA
25102 Willamina 14-Orange 1460 15-13 54% 14 OR
25103 DVA 12-Elite 1460 12-15 44% 12 PA
25104 Rage 11-Wilson 1460 11-6 65% 11 CA
25105 Blitz 12 1460 9-6 60% 12 NC
25106 575 17-Lpna calena 1460 31-40 44% 17 GA
25107 CRSURGEVBC 14 1460 16-17 47% 14 IA
25108 Malulani Black 14-S 1460 0-1 0% 14 HI
25109 JERSEY JRS 12-Regional 1460 3-4 43% 12 NJ
25110 Iowa Heart 13-Blak 1460 1-2 25% 13 IA
25111 Intense 14-S - abby 1460 23-28 45% 14 LA
25112 Panther 16-1 1460 9-6 60% 16 CO
25113 NW Arkansas Juniors Storm 13-Silver 1460 2-3 40% 13 AR
25114 Momentum 15-Enkhy 1460 3-4 43% 15 NV
25115 Kearney Elite 16-Blue 1460 2-3 40% 16 NE
25116 Central Lakes 16-1 1460 10-9 53% 16 MN
25117 DIG VBC 18-Blue 1460 3-5 38% 18 TX
25118 Coqui Coast 15 1460 17-21 45% 15 AL
25119 WBLVC 17-1 1460 16-16 47% 17 MN
25120 FAV 17 Phoenix 1460 15-17 47% 17 CA
25121 Eden Prairie 13-Black 1460 12-10 55% 13 MN
25122 Southern Alabama Volleyball Academy (SAVA) 15 SAVA Athena 1460 9-15 38% 15 AL
25123 NHVB 13-1 1460 8-11 42% 13 MN
25124 Zero Gravity 18-Gray 1460 15-14 52% 18 OH
25125 Locked In Volleyball Club 13 13U National Locked In 1460 14-16 47% 13 AL
25126 Oxygen 16-Green 1460 3-3 50% 16 NJ
25127 Carolina Vibe 13-Cj 1460 2-3 40% 13 NC
25128 Kairos 13-Sky 1460 7-7 50% 13 NC
25129 Rampage 18 Kim 1460 19-16 54% 18 VA
25130 JERSEY JRS 16-Regional 1460 2-5 29% 16 NJ
25131 SynergyForce 14-Blue 1460 13-13 50% 14 CA
25132 Fusion 16-Elite 1460 3-2 60% 16 UT
25133 AV 15-1 1460 15-16 48% 15 MN
25134 Kent County 15-Red 1460 12-10 52% 15 RI
25135 Aspire 13-Premier 1459 15-29 34% 13 AZ
25136 Summit Volleyball Club 15-3 1459 5-2 71% 15 MO
25137 Brownsville Spikers 16-S 1459 11-11 50% 16 TX
25138 PRV 16 1459 22-30 42% 16 SC
25139 Team Ok 14-BLACK 1459 16-14 50% 14 OK
25140 Premier VBC 16-Red 1459 32-23 58% 16 CO
25141 Bubbles United Volleyball Academy 16 U16 National-Gomez 1459 9-6 60% 16 FL
25142 Blue Crush Waggoner 12 1459 3-3 50% 12 OH
25143 Dayton Jrs 12-Blue 1459 4-5 44% 12 OH
25144 CVC Seth 15 1459 1-2 20% 15 AL
25145 Ark Volley 13-Regional 1459 18-19 49% 13 AR
25146 West E 15-Black 1459 7-8 47% 15 PA
25147 KC Force 17-1 1459 3-1 60% 17 MO
25148 Legit 15-G holly 1459 3-5 38% 15 IA
25149 Hive 14-Black 1459 8-21 24% 14 UT
25150 Crossfire VBC 15-Heat 1459 11-8 55% 15 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.