Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 502 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25051 Petite Eltie 11-Troy 1460 1-2 33% 11 TX
25052 MAVS KC 12-3 1460 5-9 33% 12 KS
25053 PCVC 14-Moana 1460 10-11 48% 14 CA
25054 Munciana Indy 12 Phoenix 1460 20-40 33% 12 IN
25055 573 Missouri Juniors 12-1 1460 1-4 20% 12 MO
25056 The 606 16-Prime 1460 17-22 44% 16 IL
25057 NPJO 14-Red 1460 8-7 53% 14 MN
25058 Hive 16-Grey 1460 12-28 30% 16 UT
25059 SEIVB 13-Obermeyer 1460 8-8 50% 13 IN
25060 LIVBC Girls 16-Gold 1460 16-25 39% 16 NY
25061 GVC 18-1 jordan 1460 10-12 42% 18 AL
25062 Conquest 14-Shak 1460 10-13 43% 14 NJ
25063 Belle Plaine 12-Red 1460 6-6 50% 12 MN
25064 BTownVBC 15-Black 1460 23-19 55% 15 IN
25065 DEAVB 11-Black 1460 5-11 26% 11 TX
25066 AP 15-White 1460 17-16 49% 15 TX
25067 MAVA 13-1 1460 2-3 40% 13 MN
25068 MAC 12-2 premier 1460 19-18 50% 12 OR
25069 Flyers 15-Reg-davesia 1460 0-1 0% 15 TX
25070 SA Empire 16-Royal 1460 16-13 53% 16 TX
25071 MINOI 12-Red 1460 11-8 44% 12 UT
25072 TC ELITE 13-J 1460 5-4 42% 13 LA
25073 Laurel Express 16-2 1460 17-12 46% 16 MT
25074 Miami Bombers 11-Mariana 1460 3-2 60% 11 FL
25075 573 17-National k 1460 10-12 42% 17 MO
25076 PVCGA 15-1 1460 17-8 68% 15 GA
25077 Ace Volleyball Club 16 U16 Black Ace (CA) 1460 4-3 57% 16 CO
25078 MGA 16-Condors 1460 1-5 17% 16 MA
25079 Asphalt Green VBC 15-2 1460 1-2 33% 15 NY
25080 NLVC 12-Elite 1460 12-28 30% 12 TX
25081 HP Illinois 13-Magenta 1460 0-1 0% 13 MO
25082 Blue Royals 12 Gem 1460 18-27 40% 12 WA
25083 Pulse 16-Megan 1460 2-2 40% 16 MI
25084 Jersey Jrs 17-2 1460 13-16 45% 17 NJ
25085 C2K Volleyball Club 16 16 Julien (OV) 1460 3-3 50% 16
25086 Utah Ice 18 Utah Ice Tyler 1460 3-5 38% 18 UT
25087 Bayside Vipers 15-1 1460 17-16 52% 15 NY
25088 Mission 14-White 1460 6-5 55% 14 IL
25089 Tsunami 14-1n claudia 1460 6-7 46% 14 GA
25090 WC 16-1 1460 3-4 43% 16 GA
25091 Cap City 14-Reg diamonds 1460 8-16 29% 14 MT
25092 R Pride 15-1 1460 8-7 53% 15 NY
25093 PU5H VBC 17 1460 19-19 50% 17 KY
25094 MVA 13-Nicole 1460 21-17 55% 13 FL
25095 Club UV 16 UV Nathan 1460 1-1 25% 16 UT
25096 RAJO 12-S red 1460 7-5 50% 12 MN
25097 Bullets 13-5 1460 3-3 50% 13 OH
25098 Hawks 17-Catalino 1460 22-21 51% 17 CT
25099 HOV 12-Red 1460 14-14 47% 12 VA
25100 Elite Vision 15-1 1460 16-13 55% 15 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.