2025-2026 Season — Page 502 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25051 | Petite Eltie 11-Troy | 1460 | 1-2 | 33% | 11 | TX |
| 25052 | MAVS KC 12-3 | 1460 | 5-9 | 33% | 12 | KS |
| 25053 | PCVC 14-Moana | 1460 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 25054 | Munciana Indy 12 Phoenix | 1460 | 20-40 | 33% | 12 | IN |
| 25055 | 573 Missouri Juniors 12-1 | 1460 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | MO |
| 25056 | The 606 16-Prime | 1460 | 17-22 | 44% | 16 | IL |
| 25057 | NPJO 14-Red | 1460 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | MN |
| 25058 | Hive 16-Grey | 1460 | 12-28 | 30% | 16 | UT |
| 25059 | SEIVB 13-Obermeyer | 1460 | 8-8 | 50% | 13 | IN |
| 25060 | LIVBC Girls 16-Gold | 1460 | 16-25 | 39% | 16 | NY |
| 25061 | GVC 18-1 jordan | 1460 | 10-12 | 42% | 18 | AL |
| 25062 | Conquest 14-Shak | 1460 | 10-13 | 43% | 14 | NJ |
| 25063 | Belle Plaine 12-Red | 1460 | 6-6 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 25064 | BTownVBC 15-Black | 1460 | 23-19 | 55% | 15 | IN |
| 25065 | DEAVB 11-Black | 1460 | 5-11 | 26% | 11 | TX |
| 25066 | AP 15-White | 1460 | 17-16 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 25067 | MAVA 13-1 | 1460 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | MN |
| 25068 | MAC 12-2 premier | 1460 | 19-18 | 50% | 12 | OR |
| 25069 | Flyers 15-Reg-davesia | 1460 | 0-1 | 0% | 15 | TX |
| 25070 | SA Empire 16-Royal | 1460 | 16-13 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 25071 | MINOI 12-Red | 1460 | 11-8 | 44% | 12 | UT |
| 25072 | TC ELITE 13-J | 1460 | 5-4 | 42% | 13 | LA |
| 25073 | Laurel Express 16-2 | 1460 | 17-12 | 46% | 16 | MT |
| 25074 | Miami Bombers 11-Mariana | 1460 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | FL |
| 25075 | 573 17-National k | 1460 | 10-12 | 42% | 17 | MO |
| 25076 | PVCGA 15-1 | 1460 | 17-8 | 68% | 15 | GA |
| 25077 | Ace Volleyball Club 16 U16 Black Ace (CA) | 1460 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | CO |
| 25078 | MGA 16-Condors | 1460 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | MA |
| 25079 | Asphalt Green VBC 15-2 | 1460 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | NY |
| 25080 | NLVC 12-Elite | 1460 | 12-28 | 30% | 12 | TX |
| 25081 | HP Illinois 13-Magenta | 1460 | 0-1 | 0% | 13 | MO |
| 25082 | Blue Royals 12 Gem | 1460 | 18-27 | 40% | 12 | WA |
| 25083 | Pulse 16-Megan | 1460 | 2-2 | 40% | 16 | MI |
| 25084 | Jersey Jrs 17-2 | 1460 | 13-16 | 45% | 17 | NJ |
| 25085 | C2K Volleyball Club 16 16 Julien (OV) | 1460 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | |
| 25086 | Utah Ice 18 Utah Ice Tyler | 1460 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | UT |
| 25087 | Bayside Vipers 15-1 | 1460 | 17-16 | 52% | 15 | NY |
| 25088 | Mission 14-White | 1460 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | IL |
| 25089 | Tsunami 14-1n claudia | 1460 | 6-7 | 46% | 14 | GA |
| 25090 | WC 16-1 | 1460 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | GA |
| 25091 | Cap City 14-Reg diamonds | 1460 | 8-16 | 29% | 14 | MT |
| 25092 | R Pride 15-1 | 1460 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 25093 | PU5H VBC 17 | 1460 | 19-19 | 50% | 17 | KY |
| 25094 | MVA 13-Nicole | 1460 | 21-17 | 55% | 13 | FL |
| 25095 | Club UV 16 UV Nathan | 1460 | 1-1 | 25% | 16 | UT |
| 25096 | RAJO 12-S red | 1460 | 7-5 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 25097 | Bullets 13-5 | 1460 | 3-3 | 50% | 13 | OH |
| 25098 | Hawks 17-Catalino | 1460 | 22-21 | 51% | 17 | CT |
| 25099 | HOV 12-Red | 1460 | 14-14 | 47% | 12 | VA |
| 25100 | Elite Vision 15-1 | 1460 | 16-13 | 55% | 15 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.