Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 501 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25001 Resilient Volleyball Academy 12-Navy 1461 16-13 55% 12 FL
25002 Alpha Omega Volleyball G16-2 1461 2-1 40% 16 MO
25003 Chisago Lakes 14-1 gold 1461 6-5 50% 14 MN
25004 Cottage Grove 14-1 1461 9-14 39% 14 MN
25005 South Central NE 17-Red 1461 1-5 17% 17 NE
25006 Rage 15-1 1461 7-11 39% 15 WI
25007 MoCo Volleyball Club 17 MOCO Matrix (CH) 1461 28-31 46% 17
25008 Michigan Volleyball Academy 13 MVA - Rise Academy 32 (LK) 1461 17-29 37% 13 MI
25009 Chicago Elite 16 Nike 1461 29-26 53% 16 IL
25010 CCV 16 Kaizen 1461 19-16 51% 16 AZ
25011 SA Force 14-Black 1461 20-19 51% 14 TX
25012 Buckeye 17-Black american 1461 15-14 52% 17 OH
25013 Ichiban 17-Enigma 1461 14-9 52% 17 GA
25014 Heroes 14 Ranger 1461 13-13 50% 14 TX
25015 WGVA 13-Black 1461 20-18 53% 13 GA
25016 Top Flight SC 12-Phoenix 1461 12-8 60% 12 SC
25017 AVCA 13 1461 4-1 50% 13
25018 407 12-Orlando winter mini club 1461 3-4 43% 12 FL
25019 CVC Noir 15 1461 3-5 38% 15
25020 Genesis Athletics Club Kelowna 15-Girls leviathan 1461 3-5 38% 15
25021 CGY Bulls Volleyball Club 16 16U CGY Bulls Blue 1461 4-5 44% 16
25022 Architects 13-David 1461 3-3 50% 13
25023 TYS Tornadoes 12-A 1461 2-2 50% 12 IL
25024 Raiders 17 1461 2-2 50% 17 MN
25025 CUVB 14-White tielar 1461 4-4 50% 14 TX
25026 CJVA 11-Red 1460 9-17 35% 11 NJ
25027 Fervent 12 1460 4-7 36% 12 MO
25028 MJ 12-Blue 1460 19-20 48% 12 MT
25029 AV IMPACT 15-Heat 1460 24-25 49% 15 CA
25030 C2 Sports 15 City 1460 20-21 49% 15 TN
25031 Waterloo Tigers 16 Tigers Havoc 1460 3-2 60% 16 ON
25032 ACE 11-Red 1460 1-2 33% 11 AZ
25033 Armview Storm 14-Lee 1460 3-5 38% 14
25034 NSSC 10-Black 1460 12-13 41% 10 MO
25035 IMPACT - 13-4 1460 6-8 40% 13 TX
25036 ATL Youth Sports 15-Black 1460 1-2 33% 15 IL
25037 Athena 16-Sophia 1460 18-21 46% 16 CA
25038 Green Wave 15 1460 6-10 35% 15 ND
25039 Central Mass Juniors 17-Elite 1460 3-4 43% 17 MA
25040 Country Fire 13-1 1460 14-12 52% 13 TX
25041 WWVA 14-1 nighthawks welsh 1460 7-11 39% 14 NE
25042 Advancement Academy 17 17 Green 1460 28-26 52% 17 OH
25043 MOVA 16-O 1460 20-17 54% 16 OH
25044 Send Me 16-Ricardo 1460 10-10 50% 16 AL
25045 PR Arsenal 15-Chusi 1460 3-3 50% 15 PR
25046 Red Rock 10-Michelle walnut creek 1460 2-2 50% 10 CA
25047 HAVC 18-H blue 1460 1-3 25% 18 SD
25048 BSVBC 13-Gray 1460 13-17 38% 13 IL
25049 Hawaiian Style 15 1460 4-8 33% 15 HI
25050 Oasis 17-Sf teal 1460 13-8 62% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.