Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 500 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24951 PEAK 12-5 1461 15-17 44% 12 OK
24952 OJVA 12-1 gold 1461 13-19 41% 12 OR
24953 Amarillo Xtreme 11 Lagoons 1461 13-15 46% 11 TX
24954 PDX VB 12-1 black 1461 7-9 44% 12 OR
24955 G3VB 12-1 1461 20-14 59% 12 OR
24956 Rhythm 16 Regional 1461 21-17 53% 16 TN
24957 8058Peak 15-1 1461 1-6 14% 15 CO
24958 Michio Chicago 13-Select 1461 21-19 53% 13 IL
24959 REDLINE 15-Black 1461 14-11 56% 15 MI
24960 Junior Orioles 13 1461 18-21 46% 13 IN
24961 Milwaukee Jr's 15-Silver 1461 19-15 56% 15 WI
24962 SC Midlands Volleyball 12 SC Midlands KP Red (PM) (3) 1461 2-2 50% 12 SC
24963 GSA 16-Green 1461 13-12 52% 16 NJ
24964 South MS Volleyball Club 17-National 1461 2-5 29% 17 MS
24965 HVVC 14-White 1461 25-27 48% 14 MI
24966 AVA 12-Premier 1461 12-16 43% 12 NY
24967 Premier 11-Crimson 1461 9-21 28% 11 TX
24968 Erie Elite Maui 12 1461 4-6 40% 12 OH
24969 3D 12 1461 5-8 31% 12 IA
24970 SMCJV 16-Blue 1461 18-17 45% 16 MD
24971 1United 14-Elite white 1461 15-20 35% 14 TX
24972 STVA 14-White-1 1461 20-21 49% 14 TX
24973 BVOLLOCITY 17-1 1461 8-4 67% 17 TX
24974 Ignite AZ 15 Heat 1461 31-37 46% 15 AZ
24975 Citrus 15-1 1461 3-4 43% 15 NV
24976 Elite Volleyball Clubs 18-1 1461 1-3 25% 18 KY
24977 Columbia Jrs 14-1 black 1461 11-12 48% 14
24978 WAJ 13-Purple storm white 1461 11-11 48% 13 AL
24979 TC ELITE 14-R 1461 2-3 40% 14 LA
24980 TNT 12-Voltage 1461 14-10 58% 12 PA
24981 Prime 16-Taylor 1461 17-23 43% 16 CA
24982 Madfrog 10-N white 1461 6-12 30% 10 TX
24983 TIV 11-National black 1461 2-3 40% 11 TX
24984 Ballhawks 17-1 1461 5-6 45% 17 ON
24985 Rockland 13-Black 1461 1-4 20% 13 NY
24986 SSVC Baeder 12-1 1461 15-13 54% 12 AZ
24987 AZ REV 12-Black 1461 29-29 49% 12 AZ
24988 Top Flight 17-Psi 1461 2-3 40% 17 IL
24989 RWYVA 11-1 1461 2-3 40% 11 MN
24990 MPV 11-Elite 1461 1-2 33% 11 UT
24991 Nox 17-Solstice 1461 19-20 49% 17 PA
24992 Legacy 14-Premier natalie 1461 15-14 52% 14 NY
24993 KCV 15 REGIONAL 1461 14-25 36% 15 TX
24994 Phoenix Academy Volleyball 14 PHOENIX VB 1461 7-8 47% 14 FL
24995 Cincy Crush 13-2 1461 13-17 43% 13 OH
24996 StarlingsCGA 14-1 1461 2-6 25% 14 FL
24997 NVA 14-Junior michael 1461 25-16 61% 14 FL
24998 Fusion 11-Emily 1461 3-4 43% 11 UT
24999 HJVC 15-Blue 1461 11-11 42% 15
25000 Athens Elite 13-1 1461 2-3 40% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.