2025-2026 Season — Page 499 · Ranked by Elo rating
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24901 | Lakes 14-Gold | 1462 | 8-9 | 47% | 14 | MN |
| 24902 | Clarksville VBC 12-3 | 1462 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | TN |
| 24903 | MVP Club 15-1 | 1462 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | WI |
| 24904 | TUV 10-Blue | 1462 | 2-3 | 33% | 10 | TX |
| 24905 | TVC 10-Iron | 1462 | 8-9 | 47% | 10 | FL |
| 24906 | Club Fusion 13-Royal | 1462 | 22-16 | 58% | 13 | IL |
| 24907 | Vaqueros 12-F gustavo | 1462 | 9-7 | 56% | 12 | PR |
| 24908 | Basin Reign U16-Black | 1462 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | WA |
| 24909 | Cyclones 13-E chaparrals | 1462 | 23-23 | 48% | 13 | IL |
| 24910 | Skagit 16-Red | 1462 | 17-18 | 49% | 16 | WA |
| 24911 | Woodland Park VBC 15 | 1462 | 25-23 | 52% | 15 | CO |
| 24912 | Dead Frog 17-Hannah | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | MI |
| 24913 | Molten 14-Red | 1462 | 10-13 | 43% | 14 | AZ |
| 24914 | Xplosion 15-R - quigley | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | OH |
| 24915 | Lakes 13 Maroon | 1462 | 5-10 | 31% | 13 | MN |
| 24916 | Club Cactus 17-Silver | 1462 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | AZ |
| 24917 | Xcel 17-Elite red | 1462 | 30-25 | 55% | 17 | NC |
| 24918 | DVC 16-Volt | 1462 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 24919 | EPAN 12U | 1462 | 10-12 | 42% | 12 | WV |
| 24920 | Greater 316 15-1 | 1462 | 1-2 | 25% | 15 | KS |
| 24921 | SVBC 18 | 1462 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | ID |
| 24922 | Cape Fear 16-S elite | 1462 | 26-21 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 24923 | Fuego 15 | 1462 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | SD |
| 24924 | RMVC-16 16-1 | 1462 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | |
| 24925 | CPVCA 12-1 | 1461 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | GA |
| 24926 | ProPlay 12-Anne/chloe | 1461 | 24-29 | 45% | 12 | CA |
| 24927 | UVA 12-Tiff | 1461 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | LA |
| 24928 | MN Royals 18-1 | 1461 | 13-10 | 57% | 18 | MN |
| 24929 | Uno Girls 16 National | 1461 | 23-26 | 47% | 16 | IL |
| 24930 | Independent 11-Compton | 1461 | 1-2 | 33% | 11 | IN |
| 24931 | Eclipse 14 Solar | 1461 | 21-24 | 47% | 14 | WI |
| 24932 | Prodigy 16-4 club | 1461 | 6-8 | 43% | 16 | NY |
| 24933 | TC ELITE 13 ADAMSON | 1461 | 6-7 | 40% | 13 | LA |
| 24934 | Ignite 18-National | 1461 | 35-56 | 38% | 18 | AZ |
| 24935 | Club V South 12-Katie | 1461 | 13-14 | 42% | 12 | UT |
| 24936 | Power Squad 11U | 1461 | 13-21 | 36% | 11 | IA |
| 24937 | 626 VBC 17-Red | 1461 | 18-23 | 44% | 17 | CA |
| 24938 | IHT Elite 14-3 | 1461 | 12-9 | 50% | 14 | ND |
| 24939 | Boston United 13-Royal | 1461 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | MA |
| 24940 | Cannon Falls JO 13-1 | 1461 | 9-5 | 53% | 13 | MN |
| 24941 | Delta Valley 18-Blue | 1461 | 12-12 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 24942 | NM Rev 16-Lisandro | 1461 | 17-14 | 50% | 16 | NM |
| 24943 | Wrightvbclub 10-_ madi | 1461 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | WY |
| 24944 | 830 VBA 17U | 1461 | 10-8 | 56% | 17 | TX |
| 24945 | 517 Elite 12-White | 1461 | 8-3 | 53% | 12 | MI |
| 24946 | NW Jrs 12-Black | 1461 | 25-33 | 43% | 12 | WA |
| 24947 | SNVF 12-Mount shuksan | 1461 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | WA |
| 24948 | RVC 17 | 1461 | 11-15 | 42% | 17 | SC |
| 24949 | Jupiter Elite 11 | 1461 | 1-2 | 33% | 11 | FL |
| 24950 | Tx Alpha Premier 16 Adidas | 1461 | 14-30 | 32% | 16 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.