2025-2026 Season — Page 498 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24851 | MCJO 13-S black | 1462 | 5-9 | 36% | 13 | MN |
| 24852 | Schuylkill Eclipse 14-M&m | 1462 | 5-7 | 33% | 14 | PA |
| 24853 | NS 14-Killer whales | 1462 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | MI |
| 24854 | TEMPO 13 Royal | 1462 | 12-17 | 41% | 13 | WI |
| 24855 | EM Knights 13 | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | NE |
| 24856 | NK 14-Chill | 1462 | 5-7 | 36% | 14 | ND |
| 24857 | Avidity 15-Jade | 1462 | 22-16 | 58% | 15 | MA |
| 24858 | DINAMITE 18-1 | 1462 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | CA |
| 24859 | SAND 13-Black | 1462 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 24860 | Sherwood Synergy 13 | 1462 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | AR |
| 24861 | NecTr's 15-Rue | 1462 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | NV |
| 24862 | Ohana 12-National | 1462 | 12-12 | 48% | 12 | IA |
| 24863 | Cosmic Crush VBC 14 | 1462 | 15-11 | 48% | 14 | NY |
| 24864 | Black Rock Zuzana 15 | 1462 | 16-19 | 41% | 15 | UT |
| 24865 | SEK Aces 18 SEK Aces | 1462 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | KS |
| 24866 | HOT SHOTS 12-E | 1462 | 1-2 | 20% | 12 | OH |
| 24867 | VC Denver 14 Gold | 1462 | 17-21 | 45% | 14 | CO |
| 24868 | Tsunami Volleyball Academy 13 Tsunami VBA DEV | 1462 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | FL |
| 24869 | LCVC 16-White | 1462 | 12-9 | 57% | 16 | IN |
| 24870 | FTSAVC 13-1 | 1462 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | FL |
| 24871 | Guns Up VBC 10-Sixers | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 10 | TX |
| 24872 | Atlas Volleyball club 14 | 1462 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | PA |
| 24873 | Medford 14-Black | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MN |
| 24874 | Team Mystic 15-Carnelian | 1462 | 27-23 | 54% | 15 | PA |
| 24875 | Morgan Hill 18-Elite | 1462 | 24-26 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 24876 | Mem Metro 13-Elite wht | 1462 | 21-26 | 45% | 13 | TN |
| 24877 | Horizon VBC 14 14 Wagon Rock (PR) | 1462 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | KY |
| 24878 | Train4F 13-1 | 1462 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | OH |
| 24879 | Oxford Volleyball Academy 13 13U OVA REN (DE) | 1462 | 22-18 | 55% | 13 | |
| 24880 | EnERgy 14-1 | 1462 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | MN |
| 24881 | McAllen Fierce 15-Lua | 1462 | 10-25 | 29% | 15 | TX |
| 24882 | SMASH 10-S | 1462 | 1-4 | 11% | 10 | MA |
| 24883 | Junior Mints 12-Pink | 1462 | 4-6 | 29% | 12 | TX |
| 24884 | OTX Smash 12 | 1462 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | TX |
| 24885 | Downstate 15-Red | 1462 | 24-26 | 48% | 15 | NY |
| 24886 | RAV 15-Blue | 1462 | 20-12 | 57% | 15 | GA |
| 24887 | Homer 17U | 1462 | 4-11 | 27% | 17 | AK |
| 24888 | Somerset Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | OH |
| 24889 | ZTV 16-3 gold | 1462 | 14-10 | 52% | 16 | MT |
| 24890 | Arlington 11 | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | SD |
| 24891 | Bulldogs 11 | 1462 | 7-8 | 41% | 11 | UT |
| 24892 | Impact 18-Caitlin | 1462 | 6-5 | 55% | 18 | MI |
| 24893 | MN Royals 14-3 | 1462 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | MN |
| 24894 | SUVA 14-1 | 1462 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | OH |
| 24895 | Belusa United 14-Wave | 1462 | 17-12 | 57% | 14 | IL |
| 24896 | Crossfire 18-Gold | 1462 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | MN |
| 24897 | Spokane Ignite 15 U15 Ignition (EV) (6) | 1462 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | |
| 24898 | SI Wave 14-Red | 1462 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | MO |
| 24899 | Petite Elite 10 Monse | 1462 | 4-5 | 40% | 10 | TX |
| 24900 | Cloud Peak 10 | 1462 | 2-3 | 40% | 10 | WY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.