Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 498 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24851 MCJO 13-S black 1462 5-9 36% 13 MN
24852 Schuylkill Eclipse 14-M&m 1462 5-7 33% 14 PA
24853 NS 14-Killer whales 1462 8-7 53% 14 MI
24854 TEMPO 13 Royal 1462 12-17 41% 13 WI
24855 EM Knights 13 1462 2-3 40% 13 NE
24856 NK 14-Chill 1462 5-7 36% 14 ND
24857 Avidity 15-Jade 1462 22-16 58% 15 MA
24858 DINAMITE 18-1 1462 1-6 14% 18 CA
24859 SAND 13-Black 1462 7-8 47% 13 CA
24860 Sherwood Synergy 13 1462 1-3 25% 13 AR
24861 NecTr's 15-Rue 1462 5-4 56% 15 NV
24862 Ohana 12-National 1462 12-12 48% 12 IA
24863 Cosmic Crush VBC 14 1462 15-11 48% 14 NY
24864 Black Rock Zuzana 15 1462 16-19 41% 15 UT
24865 SEK Aces 18 SEK Aces 1462 3-4 43% 18 KS
24866 HOT SHOTS 12-E 1462 1-2 20% 12 OH
24867 VC Denver 14 Gold 1462 17-21 45% 14 CO
24868 Tsunami Volleyball Academy 13 Tsunami VBA DEV 1462 5-4 56% 13 FL
24869 LCVC 16-White 1462 12-9 57% 16 IN
24870 FTSAVC 13-1 1462 2-2 50% 13 FL
24871 Guns Up VBC 10-Sixers 1462 2-3 40% 10 TX
24872 Atlas Volleyball club 14 1462 1-4 20% 14 PA
24873 Medford 14-Black 1462 2-3 40% 14 MN
24874 Team Mystic 15-Carnelian 1462 27-23 54% 15 PA
24875 Morgan Hill 18-Elite 1462 24-26 48% 18 CA
24876 Mem Metro 13-Elite wht 1462 21-26 45% 13 TN
24877 Horizon VBC 14 14 Wagon Rock (PR) 1462 2-2 50% 14 KY
24878 Train4F 13-1 1462 5-4 56% 13 OH
24879 Oxford Volleyball Academy 13 13U OVA REN (DE) 1462 22-18 55% 13
24880 EnERgy 14-1 1462 7-6 54% 14 MN
24881 McAllen Fierce 15-Lua 1462 10-25 29% 15 TX
24882 SMASH 10-S 1462 1-4 11% 10 MA
24883 Junior Mints 12-Pink 1462 4-6 29% 12 TX
24884 OTX Smash 12 1462 4-4 50% 12 TX
24885 Downstate 15-Red 1462 24-26 48% 15 NY
24886 RAV 15-Blue 1462 20-12 57% 15 GA
24887 Homer 17U 1462 4-11 27% 17 AK
24888 Somerset Volleyball Club 14-1 1462 2-3 40% 14 OH
24889 ZTV 16-3 gold 1462 14-10 52% 16 MT
24890 Arlington 11 1462 2-3 40% 11 SD
24891 Bulldogs 11 1462 7-8 41% 11 UT
24892 Impact 18-Caitlin 1462 6-5 55% 18 MI
24893 MN Royals 14-3 1462 10-11 48% 14 MN
24894 SUVA 14-1 1462 1-4 20% 14 OH
24895 Belusa United 14-Wave 1462 17-12 57% 14 IL
24896 Crossfire 18-Gold 1462 11-14 44% 18 MN
24897 Spokane Ignite 15 U15 Ignition (EV) (6) 1462 5-4 56% 15
24898 SI Wave 14-Red 1462 4-5 44% 14 MO
24899 Petite Elite 10 Monse 1462 4-5 40% 10 TX
24900 Cloud Peak 10 1462 2-3 40% 10 WY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.