Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 497 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24801 ETA 13-Black 1463 0-1 0% 13
24802 COVC 14-Regionals gold 1463 4-4 50% 14 OR
24803 FH 13-2 alaka'i jasmyn 1463 16-20 42% 13 TX
24804 Rockland 15-2 1463 1-6 14% 15 NY
24805 S-N-P 16-Coach janille 1463 1-5 17% 16 CA
24806 FSVC 16-Black tristan 1463 3-4 43% 16 NV
24807 Tsunami 13-1n caitlyn 1463 17-16 52% 13 GA
24808 SVBC Blazers 16 Brooke 1463 16-11 59% 16 SC
24809 Thundercats Volleyball 17 Thundercats Legacy (CA) 1463 5-2 71% 17
24810 Blue Royals 15 Onyx 1462 25-39 39% 15 WA
24811 WGVC 15-Elite purple 1462 25-32 44% 15 FL
24812 CLVC 14-Gray 1462 9-10 47% 14 NC
24813 Wave 14 Tsunami 1462 32-32 50% 14 KY
24814 Asphalt Green VBC 15-Green 1462 12-29 29% 15 NY
24815 Madgrog 12-E green 1462 0-1 0% 12
24816 Ama Xtreme 14-Premier 1462 2-2 40% 14
24817 Ama Xtreme 14-Havoc 1462 2-2 50% 14
24818 East Alberta Volleyball Club 16-1 1462 3-4 43% 16 AB
24819 Stingray Blue 14-2 1462 17-22 44% 14 CA
24820 Sky Spikers 15-1 1462 2-2 50% 15 PR
24821 Chelsea Piers Volleyball Club 14 U14 National 1462 2-4 33% 14 CT
24822 Crossfire 17-Black 1462 27-28 49% 17 MN
24823 AVC CLE 16-Maroon 1462 13-13 50% 16 OH
24824 UVA 16-National pink 1462 4-5 44% 16 CA
24825 Lions 12 Teal 1462 10-11 48% 12 IL
24826 Elite Volleyball Clubs 16-1 1462 3-3 50% 16 KY
24827 Stingray 16-Black 1462 11-20 35% 16 CA
24828 Premier 12-Aztek 1462 21-28 43% 12 OH
24829 Wolf Pack 13-Blue 1462 5-8 29% 13 TX
24830 Boston United 15-Select 1 1462 18-13 58% 15 MA
24831 LVL CLASSIC 14 EMMA 1462 11-14 42% 14 LA
24832 Club G1 17 G1 BOONEVILLE 1462 8-8 47% 17 AR
24833 ATHENAVB 16-Gold select 1462 2-5 29% 16 MN
24834 DIGS 16-3 1462 1-2 33% 16 MN
24835 Greater Casper 11 1462 3-2 60% 11 WY
24836 FSJ 14-Regional plus 1462 1-2 20% 14 AR
24837 Fort Calhoun Youth Sports Organization 13 13U FCYSO Pioneers (GP) (9) 1462 1-2 33% 13
24838 PVA 16 Leoneliz 16 16 1462 5-5 50% 16 PR
24839 Boston United 13-Select - gil 1462 16-13 55% 13 MA
24840 SG Elite 14-Thunder 1462 19-20 49% 14 CA
24841 Bombers VC 13-Vipers 1462 13-17 43% 13 TX
24842 Premier 13-Crimson 1462 10-19 33% 13 TX
24843 Arete 13-Prep navy 1462 7-7 47% 13 TX
24844 AVA TX 11-Attack 1462 5-9 33% 11 TX
24845 CUVC 11 Open 1462 10-21 32% 11 NC
24846 Impact 14-Blue morgan 1462 4-11 27% 14 NV
24847 402VB 16-1 1462 1-2 33% 16 NE
24848 OVBC 13-Purple 1462 14-15 48% 13 WI
24849 Big Cat 13-Black 1462 2-3 40% 13 IA
24850 LVA 14-1 1462 3-3 50% 14 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.