Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 496 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24751 Hawks VBC 12-2 1463 2-2 50% 12 OH
24752 Impulse 13-Black 1463 7-6 50% 13 IN
24753 Reach Elite 16 1463 32-22 59% 16 FL
24754 Guns Up VBC 11-2 sixers 1463 2-3 40% 11 TX
24755 ECC 17-South red 1463 17-18 49% 17 NJ
24756 Black Canyon Wade 14 1463 1-2 33% 14 CO
24757 Mesa Juniors VBCO 14-White 1463 1-2 33% 14 CO
24758 Falconer Volleyball 16-1 1463 2-2 40% 16 NY
24759 Lancers 10U Black 1463 1-2 33% 10 IA
24760 ATHENA VB 12-2 gold select 1463 24-24 50% 12 OR
24761 Team Velocity 16-Black 1463 25-28 47% 16 CO
24762 3s Up VBA 12-1 1463 8-11 38% 12 SC
24763 Integrity 11-Club blue 1463 11-20 31% 11 PA
24764 Eastside 11-R phettaphong 1463 2-2 50% 11 OH
24765 Allegheny Volleyball Club 15-Black 1463 2-3 40% 15 PA
24766 Princeton 15-Blue 1463 8-23 26% 15 NJ
24767 SVBC Blazers 18 Calin 1463 19-10 63% 18 SC
24768 Summit 17-1 1463 1-4 20% 17 MO
24769 NSSC 14-White 1463 7-11 33% 14 MO
24770 WACO VBC 13-Ua red 1463 13-18 39% 13 TX
24771 SUN CITY RAPTORS 13 Sun City Raptors - Select (SU) 1463 2-2 50% 13 TX
24772 SA Empire 14 Legacy 1463 18-18 49% 14 TX
24773 IVC 14-Angela 1463 10-11 42% 14 TX
24774 ESVBC 14-Cobras 1463 12-12 50% 14 IA
24775 Houston Hazard 14-Blue 1463 6-6 46% 14 TX
24776 EMV 14-Metro white kari 1463 5-4 45% 14 TX
24777 Aces 11-Purple 1463 3-6 33% 11 ND
24778 Kayla 16-2 1463 1-1 25% 16 AL
24779 CRSURGEVBC 12 1463 8-9 38% 12 IA
24780 Nassau Elite Volleyball Club 14 U14 Silver (FL) (8) 1463 7-8 47% 14 FL
24781 3CVBC 12 Impact 1463 21-20 47% 12 TX
24782 Vhawk Xtreme 17-Adidas 1463 3-4 43% 17 MN
24783 S STORM 17 1463 9-6 60% 17 MI
24784 BVA FC 16-Navy kiara 1463 18-20 47% 16 KY
24785 MJ 14-Blue 1463 18-16 46% 14 MT
24786 Westview 11-Watts 1463 2-3 40% 11 IN
24787 OYA 17 1463 5-7 42% 17 CA
24788 WVBA 13-Regional black 1463 2-2 50% 13 FL
24789 NIVA 16 SILVER 1463 36-25 59% 16 IN
24790 Air VBC 12-Black 1463 10-9 53% 12 WI
24791 WEVC 18-PINK 1463 18-15 53% 18 NC
24792 Liberty All-Stars 11 1463 1-2 25% 11 IA
24793 VOLT 14-Pink 1463 24-23 51% 14 ND
24794 TAV South 10-White 1463 3-6 27% 10 TX
24795 Cyclones 14-Paramount 1463 22-18 48% 14 IL
24796 Ozark Juniors 13-Blue 1463 20-18 53% 13 AR
24797 KeAloha 14-1 cp 1463 17-18 49% 14 IN
24798 MiElite 15-Peyton north 1463 6-3 60% 15 MI
24799 DVC 14 1463 20-19 48% 14 TN
24800 ViperVolleyball Club 15 1463 3-4 43% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.