Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 495 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24701 Tsunami 17-1n azya 1463 13-14 48% 17 GA
24702 Pacific Rim Volleyball Academy 13 PRVA Surf 1463 10-9 53% 13 CA
24703 City 13 Navy 1463 9-18 33% 13 CA
24704 Red Rock 13-Jho-jho martinez 1463 12-23 34% 13 CA
24705 Rue 15 1463 2-3 40% 15 NV
24706 Magnitude VBC 15-N 1463 35-33 51% 15 AZ
24707 Instinct VBC 16-Wild black 1463 4-4 50% 16 MN
24708 Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 14-Skyline 1463 17-16 52% 14 NY
24709 IEV 12-U blue 1463 14-20 41% 12 FL
24710 REIGN 12-Pink 1463 8-9 47% 12 FL
24711 TeamD 13-Ranger 1463 12-6 67% 13 MI
24712 Aspire 18-Black 1463 2-2 50% 18 AZ
24713 Trivolley 17-Trinidad 1463 2-3 40% 17 PR
24714 ECVC 14-Reg pc - caroline 1463 15-16 48% 14 AL
24715 Aspire NW 18-2 vancouver 1463 3-5 38% 18 WA
24716 NWJRS 18-Slate 1463 2-3 40% 18 WA
24717 SW Pursuit Volleyball 13-1 1463 10-5 53% 13 MO
24718 Mid Coast 14-Red 1463 11-5 69% 14 CA
24719 City 12-Blue 1463 21-27 44% 12 CA
24720 Wave 12 1463 5-7 36% 12 CA
24721 FPVC 14-Derek 1463 2-3 40% 14 CA
24722 Fusion 18-Elite 1463 12-7 60% 18 VT
24723 SAJO 14-1 1463 15-20 43% 14 MN
24724 Golden State 14-Black 1463 13-20 39% 14 CA
24725 AVC CLE 14-Maroon 1463 14-13 52% 14 OH
24726 Rise 18-Yellow 1463 20-18 53% 18 CO
24727 ID ONE 15-Mccall 1463 4-4 50% 15 ID
24728 Riptide 15-Tsunami 1463 23-29 44% 15 ID
24729 626 Volleyball Club 16-Red 1463 19-22 46% 16 CA
24730 Dynamix 16-Black 1463 22-20 52% 16 CA
24731 Advantage 13-White 1463 10-15 40% 13 NC
24732 NVC Blaze 14 1463 2-3 40% 14 ID
24733 CFVVB 12 1463 4-4 44% 12 MT
24734 High Tide 18-Elite 1463 13-31 30% 18 FL
24735 208 14-White 1463 11-16 41% 14 ID
24736 Horizon VBC 13 14 Knobby Rock 1463 2-3 40% 13 KY
24737 Air VBC 13-White 1463 4-6 40% 13 WI
24738 The 606 12-Red 1463 5-6 45% 12 IL
24739 Huskies 12-1 1463 4-7 36% 12 ND
24740 SynVBC 17-1 1463 11-9 55% 17 NY
24741 Jaguars 17-Black 1463 22-22 50% 17 NY
24742 South Bay 17-Black 1463 22-21 51% 17 NY
24743 OnSite Classics 18u 1463 24-16 57% 18 TX
24744 Kaizen VBA 16 1463 36-26 58% 16 VA
24745 X-Factor Volleyball 16-2 1463 26-24 51% 16 VA
24746 SoCal VBC 15-Pipes 1463 11-16 41% 15 CA
24747 Loudoun Elite 16-Izzy/hailey 1463 32-41 44% 16 VA
24748 IFJ 14-Jayde 1463 0-7 0% 14 UT
24749 Club Idaho 14-Black 1463 0-2 0% 14 UT
24750 East Texas Crush 16-S 1463 2-3 40% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.