2025-2026 Season — Page 495 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24701 | Tsunami 17-1n azya | 1463 | 13-14 | 48% | 17 | GA |
| 24702 | Pacific Rim Volleyball Academy 13 PRVA Surf | 1463 | 10-9 | 53% | 13 | CA |
| 24703 | City 13 Navy | 1463 | 9-18 | 33% | 13 | CA |
| 24704 | Red Rock 13-Jho-jho martinez | 1463 | 12-23 | 34% | 13 | CA |
| 24705 | Rue 15 | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | NV |
| 24706 | Magnitude VBC 15-N | 1463 | 35-33 | 51% | 15 | AZ |
| 24707 | Instinct VBC 16-Wild black | 1463 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 24708 | Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 14-Skyline | 1463 | 17-16 | 52% | 14 | NY |
| 24709 | IEV 12-U blue | 1463 | 14-20 | 41% | 12 | FL |
| 24710 | REIGN 12-Pink | 1463 | 8-9 | 47% | 12 | FL |
| 24711 | TeamD 13-Ranger | 1463 | 12-6 | 67% | 13 | MI |
| 24712 | Aspire 18-Black | 1463 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | AZ |
| 24713 | Trivolley 17-Trinidad | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | PR |
| 24714 | ECVC 14-Reg pc - caroline | 1463 | 15-16 | 48% | 14 | AL |
| 24715 | Aspire NW 18-2 vancouver | 1463 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | WA |
| 24716 | NWJRS 18-Slate | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | WA |
| 24717 | SW Pursuit Volleyball 13-1 | 1463 | 10-5 | 53% | 13 | MO |
| 24718 | Mid Coast 14-Red | 1463 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 24719 | City 12-Blue | 1463 | 21-27 | 44% | 12 | CA |
| 24720 | Wave 12 | 1463 | 5-7 | 36% | 12 | CA |
| 24721 | FPVC 14-Derek | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 24722 | Fusion 18-Elite | 1463 | 12-7 | 60% | 18 | VT |
| 24723 | SAJO 14-1 | 1463 | 15-20 | 43% | 14 | MN |
| 24724 | Golden State 14-Black | 1463 | 13-20 | 39% | 14 | CA |
| 24725 | AVC CLE 14-Maroon | 1463 | 14-13 | 52% | 14 | OH |
| 24726 | Rise 18-Yellow | 1463 | 20-18 | 53% | 18 | CO |
| 24727 | ID ONE 15-Mccall | 1463 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | ID |
| 24728 | Riptide 15-Tsunami | 1463 | 23-29 | 44% | 15 | ID |
| 24729 | 626 Volleyball Club 16-Red | 1463 | 19-22 | 46% | 16 | CA |
| 24730 | Dynamix 16-Black | 1463 | 22-20 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 24731 | Advantage 13-White | 1463 | 10-15 | 40% | 13 | NC |
| 24732 | NVC Blaze 14 | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | ID |
| 24733 | CFVVB 12 | 1463 | 4-4 | 44% | 12 | MT |
| 24734 | High Tide 18-Elite | 1463 | 13-31 | 30% | 18 | FL |
| 24735 | 208 14-White | 1463 | 11-16 | 41% | 14 | ID |
| 24736 | Horizon VBC 13 14 Knobby Rock | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | KY |
| 24737 | Air VBC 13-White | 1463 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | WI |
| 24738 | The 606 12-Red | 1463 | 5-6 | 45% | 12 | IL |
| 24739 | Huskies 12-1 | 1463 | 4-7 | 36% | 12 | ND |
| 24740 | SynVBC 17-1 | 1463 | 11-9 | 55% | 17 | NY |
| 24741 | Jaguars 17-Black | 1463 | 22-22 | 50% | 17 | NY |
| 24742 | South Bay 17-Black | 1463 | 22-21 | 51% | 17 | NY |
| 24743 | OnSite Classics 18u | 1463 | 24-16 | 57% | 18 | TX |
| 24744 | Kaizen VBA 16 | 1463 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | VA |
| 24745 | X-Factor Volleyball 16-2 | 1463 | 26-24 | 51% | 16 | VA |
| 24746 | SoCal VBC 15-Pipes | 1463 | 11-16 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 24747 | Loudoun Elite 16-Izzy/hailey | 1463 | 32-41 | 44% | 16 | VA |
| 24748 | IFJ 14-Jayde | 1463 | 0-7 | 0% | 14 | UT |
| 24749 | Club Idaho 14-Black | 1463 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | UT |
| 24750 | East Texas Crush 16-S | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.