Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 494 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24651 SSAVC 17-1 1464 3-5 38% 17 GA
24652 Rimrock 12 1464 23-12 56% 12 MT
24653 Cajun Coast Athletics 14 1464 6-8 43% 14 LA
24654 MVP 13-Black (GA) 1464 3-4 43% 13 GA
24655 NM Cactus 12-L1 1464 11-7 61% 12 NM
24656 WVVC 15-Green 1464 6-12 33% 15 NY
24657 Currahee Volleyball Club 16-1 1464 2-4 33% 16 GA
24658 Heroes 17-Seal 1464 18-12 58% 17 TX
24659 JM 10 1464 14-27 34% 10 FL
24660 Hammerhead 13-2 1464 18-19 47% 13 MN
24661 WVC 16-1 1464 18-16 53% 16 MN
24662 RWYVA 12-White 1464 2-2 50% 12 MN
24663 Stingray VBA 15-Select kp 1464 13-16 45% 15 OK
24664 Mizuno M1 16-3 1464 28-41 41% 16 MN
24665 OKI VC 16-1 1464 11-7 61% 16 NC
24666 Wisconsin Premier 15-Teal 1464 29-29 50% 15 WI
24667 Chicago Premier VBC 14 14 GOLD (GL) 1464 1-2 33% 14
24668 TX Legends 13-Black 1464 14-20 41% 13 TX
24669 Crusader Juniors 17 1464 2-2 50% 17 MN
24670 Va Wave 18 Tidal 1464 27-19 59% 18 VA
24671 Conquest 16-Jarod 1464 10-13 40% 16 NJ
24672 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 14 MOCO (MD) Meteors 1464 2-3 40% 14 MD
24673 BVCAL 13-Jasimine 1464 1-1 25% 13 AL
24674 CPVC 14-Kome 1464 2-2 50% 14 CA
24675 Ho'okahi 17-S 1464 1-2 33% 17 HI
24676 RVC Legacy 18 1464 124-92 56% 18 TX
24677 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-T jules 1464 13-15 46% 16 NJ
24678 KPV 14-Pink-brooke 1464 21-26 44% 14 KY
24679 MiElite 13-National 1464 14-36 28% 13 MI
24680 SAJO 15 1464 6-9 40% 15 MN
24681 KPV 16-Pink-kelli 1464 22-22 50% 16 KY
24682 OptimalVBC 15-1 1464 21-13 60% 15 GA
24683 TOVC 17-Yeye 1464 2-3 40% 17 PR
24684 BBVA 15-Regional 1464 15-14 52% 15 FL
24685 Pulse 16 Yoshi 1464 16-17 48% 16 CA
24686 Miami Wave 15-Black 1464 15-13 54% 15 FL
24687 PVA 14-3 1464 2-2 40% 14 MO
24688 Mass Impact 16-Celia 1464 21-16 57% 16 MA
24689 WI Flight 14-Blue 1464 10-11 48% 14 WI
24690 K1 Bayamon 16-20 1464 4-2 67% 16 PR
24691 Gators 16-Black 1464 25-37 40% 16 MA
24692 Elevation 17-Timberline red 1464 12-22 35% 17 CO
24693 LBK 11-2 1463 5-5 50% 11 OH
24694 Warren Sixpack 18-Red 1463 10-14 42% 18 NJ
24695 Iowa Select 17-S 1463 1-3 25% 17 IA
24696 Sideout 11-Elite 1463 19-17 53% 11 FL
24697 Iowa Select 17 1463 1-2 25% 17 IA
24698 Hanover VC 13-1 1463 4-7 36% 13 PA
24699 M2 Volleyball 17-E3 1463 38-39 49% 17 GA
24700 Boise Ignite 16-Natl 1463 2-5 29% 16 ID
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.