2025-2026 Season — Page 494 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24651 | SSAVC 17-1 | 1464 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | GA |
| 24652 | Rimrock 12 | 1464 | 23-12 | 56% | 12 | MT |
| 24653 | Cajun Coast Athletics 14 | 1464 | 6-8 | 43% | 14 | LA |
| 24654 | MVP 13-Black (GA) | 1464 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | GA |
| 24655 | NM Cactus 12-L1 | 1464 | 11-7 | 61% | 12 | NM |
| 24656 | WVVC 15-Green | 1464 | 6-12 | 33% | 15 | NY |
| 24657 | Currahee Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1464 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | GA |
| 24658 | Heroes 17-Seal | 1464 | 18-12 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 24659 | JM 10 | 1464 | 14-27 | 34% | 10 | FL |
| 24660 | Hammerhead 13-2 | 1464 | 18-19 | 47% | 13 | MN |
| 24661 | WVC 16-1 | 1464 | 18-16 | 53% | 16 | MN |
| 24662 | RWYVA 12-White | 1464 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 24663 | Stingray VBA 15-Select kp | 1464 | 13-16 | 45% | 15 | OK |
| 24664 | Mizuno M1 16-3 | 1464 | 28-41 | 41% | 16 | MN |
| 24665 | OKI VC 16-1 | 1464 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | NC |
| 24666 | Wisconsin Premier 15-Teal | 1464 | 29-29 | 50% | 15 | WI |
| 24667 | Chicago Premier VBC 14 14 GOLD (GL) | 1464 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | |
| 24668 | TX Legends 13-Black | 1464 | 14-20 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 24669 | Crusader Juniors 17 | 1464 | 2-2 | 50% | 17 | MN |
| 24670 | Va Wave 18 Tidal | 1464 | 27-19 | 59% | 18 | VA |
| 24671 | Conquest 16-Jarod | 1464 | 10-13 | 40% | 16 | NJ |
| 24672 | MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 14 MOCO (MD) Meteors | 1464 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MD |
| 24673 | BVCAL 13-Jasimine | 1464 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | AL |
| 24674 | CPVC 14-Kome | 1464 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 24675 | Ho'okahi 17-S | 1464 | 1-2 | 33% | 17 | HI |
| 24676 | RVC Legacy 18 | 1464 | 124-92 | 56% | 18 | TX |
| 24677 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-T jules | 1464 | 13-15 | 46% | 16 | NJ |
| 24678 | KPV 14-Pink-brooke | 1464 | 21-26 | 44% | 14 | KY |
| 24679 | MiElite 13-National | 1464 | 14-36 | 28% | 13 | MI |
| 24680 | SAJO 15 | 1464 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | MN |
| 24681 | KPV 16-Pink-kelli | 1464 | 22-22 | 50% | 16 | KY |
| 24682 | OptimalVBC 15-1 | 1464 | 21-13 | 60% | 15 | GA |
| 24683 | TOVC 17-Yeye | 1464 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | PR |
| 24684 | BBVA 15-Regional | 1464 | 15-14 | 52% | 15 | FL |
| 24685 | Pulse 16 Yoshi | 1464 | 16-17 | 48% | 16 | CA |
| 24686 | Miami Wave 15-Black | 1464 | 15-13 | 54% | 15 | FL |
| 24687 | PVA 14-3 | 1464 | 2-2 | 40% | 14 | MO |
| 24688 | Mass Impact 16-Celia | 1464 | 21-16 | 57% | 16 | MA |
| 24689 | WI Flight 14-Blue | 1464 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | WI |
| 24690 | K1 Bayamon 16-20 | 1464 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | PR |
| 24691 | Gators 16-Black | 1464 | 25-37 | 40% | 16 | MA |
| 24692 | Elevation 17-Timberline red | 1464 | 12-22 | 35% | 17 | CO |
| 24693 | LBK 11-2 | 1463 | 5-5 | 50% | 11 | OH |
| 24694 | Warren Sixpack 18-Red | 1463 | 10-14 | 42% | 18 | NJ |
| 24695 | Iowa Select 17-S | 1463 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | IA |
| 24696 | Sideout 11-Elite | 1463 | 19-17 | 53% | 11 | FL |
| 24697 | Iowa Select 17 | 1463 | 1-2 | 25% | 17 | IA |
| 24698 | Hanover VC 13-1 | 1463 | 4-7 | 36% | 13 | PA |
| 24699 | M2 Volleyball 17-E3 | 1463 | 38-39 | 49% | 17 | GA |
| 24700 | Boise Ignite 16-Natl | 1463 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | ID |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.