Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 504 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25151 Summit Volleyball Club 14-3 1459 4-2 67% 14 MO
25152 XP 12-Spring white 1459 0-1 0% 12 IL
25153 Impact 14-Natalie l 1459 3-2 60% 14 MI
25154 NE Elite 14-Peak 1459 13-21 38% 14 NE
25155 L2 Volleyball Club 14 L2 341 (LK) 1459 14-11 54% 14 MI
25156 Pono 13-1 katie 1459 14-20 35% 13 TX
25157 DIG 13-A westen 1459 4-4 50% 13 TX
25158 APV 13-National royal 1459 13-28 28% 13 TX
25159 HJVC 14-Red 1459 12-18 34% 14
25160 Hawks 14-S 1459 11-11 48% 14 CT
25161 Athletic Empire 13 1459 13-16 45% 13 TX
25162 SG Elite 15 Tornado 1459 14-13 52% 15 CA
25163 KODA 12-Crown 1459 2-3 33% 12 NY
25164 Air VBC 15-National 1459 16-19 46% 15 WI
25165 603 United 16-Central national 1459 2-5 29% 16 NH
25166 315 VC 17-1 girls 1459 1-2 25% 17 NY
25167 E3VB 12 Excel 1459 16-22 42% 12 NM
25168 VOLAB 17-1 kali 1459 3-4 43% 17 TX
25169 Texas Fury 14 Fusion 1459 21-22 49% 14 TX
25170 Brownsville Spikers 14-S 1459 8-10 42% 14 TX
25171 Shock 15-Sting 1459 22-23 49% 15 IL
25172 CWVC 13-White 1459 2-2 50% 13 WI
25173 Champion 16-R purple 1459 2-3 40% 16 NC
25174 Kings County KCV 16-1 1459 22-18 55% 16 CA
25175 Club 909 16-2 1459 17-24 41% 16 CA
25176 NSSC 11-White 1459 14-16 47% 11 MO
25177 ENG_VB 12-1 1459 11-13 46% 12 AR
25178 OK Charge 17-1 1459 1-3 25% 17 OK
25179 Chicago Elite 15 National 1459 29-33 47% 15 IL
25180 Idaho ONE 15-Im hanson 1459 18-34 35% 15 ID
25181 ID Crush 15-Griffin 1459 27-34 44% 15 ID
25182 Omni 12-R1 1459 22-16 58% 12 AZ
25183 Dunes 15-White 1459 20-21 49% 15 IN
25184 Orono 11-Blue 1459 2-5 29% 11 MN
25185 Colorado Roughriders 18-Black 1459 16-12 57% 18 CO
25186 Schuylkill Eclipse 17-Lunar 1459 2-5 29% 17 PA
25187 High Line 17 Aspiring 1459 30-25 51% 17 PA
25188 FL Conquer 14-Local orange 1459 13-9 59% 14 FL
25189 Top Notch 13-Green 1459 9-6 53% 13 MO
25190 MN Freeze 14-Gray 1459 7-5 58% 14 MN
25191 Club 217 14-Mikayla 1459 11-11 50% 14 IL
25192 Club Selah 14-Silver 1459 8-8 50% 14 WA
25193 TVVC 18-Coral 1459 11-14 44% 18 OR
25194 Prism 14 Amber 1459 21-39 35% 14 WA
25195 Oxford Volleyball Academy 14 14U OVA Blue 1459 15-15 50% 14
25196 Freeze 12-Black 1459 7-13 35% 12 MN
25197 Purple Elite 12 1459 4-4 50% 12 MN
25198 FCA 14 Gabe 1459 16-20 44% 14 NC
25199 KCV 12-2 whitney 1459 2-3 40% 12 CA
25200 A5 Chattanooga 15-2 1459 34-49 41% 15 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.