2025-2026 Season — Page 504 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25151 | Summit Volleyball Club 14-3 | 1459 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | MO |
| 25152 | XP 12-Spring white | 1459 | 0-1 | 0% | 12 | IL |
| 25153 | Impact 14-Natalie l | 1459 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | MI |
| 25154 | NE Elite 14-Peak | 1459 | 13-21 | 38% | 14 | NE |
| 25155 | L2 Volleyball Club 14 L2 341 (LK) | 1459 | 14-11 | 54% | 14 | MI |
| 25156 | Pono 13-1 katie | 1459 | 14-20 | 35% | 13 | TX |
| 25157 | DIG 13-A westen | 1459 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | TX |
| 25158 | APV 13-National royal | 1459 | 13-28 | 28% | 13 | TX |
| 25159 | HJVC 14-Red | 1459 | 12-18 | 34% | 14 | |
| 25160 | Hawks 14-S | 1459 | 11-11 | 48% | 14 | CT |
| 25161 | Athletic Empire 13 | 1459 | 13-16 | 45% | 13 | TX |
| 25162 | SG Elite 15 Tornado | 1459 | 14-13 | 52% | 15 | CA |
| 25163 | KODA 12-Crown | 1459 | 2-3 | 33% | 12 | NY |
| 25164 | Air VBC 15-National | 1459 | 16-19 | 46% | 15 | WI |
| 25165 | 603 United 16-Central national | 1459 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | NH |
| 25166 | 315 VC 17-1 girls | 1459 | 1-2 | 25% | 17 | NY |
| 25167 | E3VB 12 Excel | 1459 | 16-22 | 42% | 12 | NM |
| 25168 | VOLAB 17-1 kali | 1459 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | TX |
| 25169 | Texas Fury 14 Fusion | 1459 | 21-22 | 49% | 14 | TX |
| 25170 | Brownsville Spikers 14-S | 1459 | 8-10 | 42% | 14 | TX |
| 25171 | Shock 15-Sting | 1459 | 22-23 | 49% | 15 | IL |
| 25172 | CWVC 13-White | 1459 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | WI |
| 25173 | Champion 16-R purple | 1459 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | NC |
| 25174 | Kings County KCV 16-1 | 1459 | 22-18 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 25175 | Club 909 16-2 | 1459 | 17-24 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 25176 | NSSC 11-White | 1459 | 14-16 | 47% | 11 | MO |
| 25177 | ENG_VB 12-1 | 1459 | 11-13 | 46% | 12 | AR |
| 25178 | OK Charge 17-1 | 1459 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | OK |
| 25179 | Chicago Elite 15 National | 1459 | 29-33 | 47% | 15 | IL |
| 25180 | Idaho ONE 15-Im hanson | 1459 | 18-34 | 35% | 15 | ID |
| 25181 | ID Crush 15-Griffin | 1459 | 27-34 | 44% | 15 | ID |
| 25182 | Omni 12-R1 | 1459 | 22-16 | 58% | 12 | AZ |
| 25183 | Dunes 15-White | 1459 | 20-21 | 49% | 15 | IN |
| 25184 | Orono 11-Blue | 1459 | 2-5 | 29% | 11 | MN |
| 25185 | Colorado Roughriders 18-Black | 1459 | 16-12 | 57% | 18 | CO |
| 25186 | Schuylkill Eclipse 17-Lunar | 1459 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | PA |
| 25187 | High Line 17 Aspiring | 1459 | 30-25 | 51% | 17 | PA |
| 25188 | FL Conquer 14-Local orange | 1459 | 13-9 | 59% | 14 | FL |
| 25189 | Top Notch 13-Green | 1459 | 9-6 | 53% | 13 | MO |
| 25190 | MN Freeze 14-Gray | 1459 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | MN |
| 25191 | Club 217 14-Mikayla | 1459 | 11-11 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 25192 | Club Selah 14-Silver | 1459 | 8-8 | 50% | 14 | WA |
| 25193 | TVVC 18-Coral | 1459 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | OR |
| 25194 | Prism 14 Amber | 1459 | 21-39 | 35% | 14 | WA |
| 25195 | Oxford Volleyball Academy 14 14U OVA Blue | 1459 | 15-15 | 50% | 14 | |
| 25196 | Freeze 12-Black | 1459 | 7-13 | 35% | 12 | MN |
| 25197 | Purple Elite 12 | 1459 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 25198 | FCA 14 Gabe | 1459 | 16-20 | 44% | 14 | NC |
| 25199 | KCV 12-2 whitney | 1459 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 25200 | A5 Chattanooga 15-2 | 1459 | 34-49 | 41% | 15 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.