2025-2026 Season — Page 505 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25201 | Redlands Renegade Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1459 | 22-22 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 25202 | GSA 18-Portillo | 1459 | 5-10 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 25203 | Lincoln 16-1 | 1459 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | IN |
| 25204 | Mem Metro 10-Travel black | 1459 | 10-10 | 50% | 10 | TN |
| 25205 | CB Elite 18 Navy | 1459 | 6-5 | 55% | 18 | WA |
| 25206 | FaR Out 12-Red | 1459 | 17-19 | 47% | 12 | MI |
| 25207 | Top Flight 16-Nu | 1459 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 25208 | UP North Jrs DSN 12-Boys | 1459 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | WI |
| 25209 | Fearsome 14-Black | 1459 | 14-17 | 45% | 14 | AR |
| 25210 | BSVBC 16-Silver | 1459 | 24-20 | 53% | 16 | IL |
| 25211 | White Cross Elite 18-Cd | 1459 | 16-15 | 52% | 18 | NC |
| 25212 | PV 11-Silver | 1459 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | IA |
| 25213 | Maricopa Power 18-1 | 1459 | 30-18 | 63% | 18 | AZ |
| 25214 | 1W 14-Black | 1459 | 18-17 | 51% | 14 | WI |
| 25215 | Club Apex 12-White | 1459 | 11-11 | 50% | 12 | KY |
| 25216 | Galaxy Volleyball club 12-1 | 1459 | 8-3 | 53% | 12 | KS |
| 25217 | Illini NW 16-Lime green | 1459 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | IL |
| 25218 | Wisconsin Elite 17-Blue | 1459 | 38-31 | 55% | 17 | WI |
| 25219 | Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 17 17 Lightning (OV) | 1459 | 19-17 | 53% | 17 | WV |
| 25220 | POVBC 18-1 | 1459 | 6-10 | 38% | 18 | OH |
| 25221 | Northern Attack 16-Maroon | 1459 | 9-8 | 53% | 16 | MN |
| 25222 | Premier Volleyball 13 Premier Extreme (CH) | 1459 | 17-13 | 57% | 13 | DE |
| 25223 | Vital 13-3 white | 1459 | 29-26 | 53% | 13 | MN |
| 25224 | Ghost Elite 14-1 | 1459 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | WY |
| 25225 | BVC 13-Melissa | 1459 | 13-19 | 41% | 13 | CA |
| 25226 | NVPUR 14-Luis | 1459 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | PR |
| 25227 | TAINAS 14 | 1459 | 10-8 | 56% | 14 | PR |
| 25228 | Trivolley 14-2 trinidad | 1459 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | PR |
| 25229 | LAVA North 13 Premier | 1459 | 16-18 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 25230 | SRS 13-Red | 1459 | 11-13 | 46% | 13 | SC |
| 25231 | Mizuno M1 16-Wht | 1459 | 33-30 | 52% | 16 | MN |
| 25232 | GSVC 18-Navy | 1459 | 27-19 | 59% | 18 | NH |
| 25233 | William United 16-1 | 1459 | 7-9 | 44% | 16 | NY |
| 25234 | TX Legends 15 Navy | 1459 | 14-11 | 48% | 15 | TX |
| 25235 | Gators 16-Green | 1459 | 25-16 | 61% | 16 | MA |
| 25236 | ACC AMBITION 17-1 prime | 1459 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | NV |
| 25237 | Xtreme VBC 16 Adidas | 1459 | 20-23 | 47% | 16 | WI |
| 25238 | Salt Lake 13-Green | 1459 | 10-7 | 45% | 13 | UT |
| 25239 | TXPW 12-1 | 1459 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | |
| 25240 | TKVBC 14-Ranger elite 2 | 1459 | 39-30 | 57% | 14 | GA |
| 25241 | SFS 14 | 1459 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | FL |
| 25242 | NC Elite 15-Black | 1459 | 10-18 | 36% | 15 | NC |
| 25243 | A5 11-Ada | 1459 | 20-34 | 37% | 11 | GA |
| 25244 | APV 12-Regional royal | 1459 | 11-18 | 37% | 12 | TX |
| 25245 | GCVBC 14-Young | 1459 | 14-15 | 48% | 14 | OH |
| 25246 | CJV 14 Regional | 1459 | 13-14 | 48% | 14 | AR |
| 25247 | GoTime 12-2r | 1459 | 17-18 | 49% | 12 | IN |
| 25248 | 316VBC 15-White | 1459 | 8-6 | 57% | 15 | KS |
| 25249 | Alpha Omega 14-National | 1459 | 8-14 | 36% | 14 | MO |
| 25250 | PAVC - NC 14-Jade | 1458 | 19-23 | 45% | 14 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.