Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 506 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25251 AR Metro 17-Regional plus 1458 26-24 52% 17 AR
25252 Rise 17-Regional 1458 14-13 52% 17 CA
25253 High Voltage 15-Black 1458 1-1 50% 15 MN
25254 SVC NGV 17-Mark 1458 20-24 45% 17 GA
25255 VAAVBC 17 1458 29-32 45% 17 VA
25256 Bombers VC 15-ACES 1458 18-20 45% 15 TX
25257 Cougar Volleyball Club 14-B 1458 4-5 44% 14 IA
25258 CJV 13-National navy 1458 24-40 38% 13 NC
25259 Cool Sunshine 16-1 1458 7-8 37% 16 NM
25260 EP Elite 13-Teal 1458 6-11 35% 13 TX
25261 LBJ 11-1 1458 1-2 33% 11 ND
25262 TEVO 12 TEVO-6 1458 2-2 50% 12
25263 NNJ 14-Masyn 1458 7-9 44% 14 NV
25264 Notorious VBC 14 Notorious DIG 1458 2-4 33% 14 LA
25265 Champs Juniors 16-1 1458 4-3 50% 16 MO
25266 NM HEAT 18-1 1458 3-3 50% 18 MI
25267 Midwest Juniors 12-3 1458 2-3 40% 12 KS
25268 CSVC 14-3 1458 1-2 33% 14 IN
25269 Freeze 14-Black 1458 13-14 48% 14 MN
25270 Kokoro Volleyball 14 Org 1458 27-16 63% 14 MN
25271 Cleveland Chaos 14-Ue 1458 22-33 40% 14 NC
25272 HOT SHOTS 10-Cp 1458 4-4 33% 10 OH
25273 Static Volleyball Club G13-1 1458 2-2 50% 13 MO
25274 RockCity 13 N2 1458 25-38 40% 13 OH
25275 HP Illinois 13-Orchid 1458 0-1 0% 13 MO
25276 SPVA 13-Asteroid 1458 19-19 50% 13 PA
25277 VCN 17-Blue 1458 3-4 43% 17 NE
25278 LAVA 14-1 1458 12-16 43% 14 OH
25279 Diggersz 17-Black demi 1458 7-13 30% 17 IL
25280 Barnum 16-1 1458 2-2 50% 16 MN
25281 CSVC 15-3 1458 1-3 25% 15 IN
25282 UNION 12-Purple 1458 29-40 42% 12 IN
25283 TNT 15 Fury 1458 12-16 43% 15 PA
25284 Prime Performance 12-Teal 1458 11-12 48% 12 AZ
25285 Apex Volleyball Club 12-2 1458 1-3 20% 12 MO
25286 Kokoro 14-White 1458 12-9 57% 14 OH
25287 Tsunami 18-2e eder 1458 14-28 33% 18 GA
25288 P3R 13-Hot metal 1458 5-6 45% 13 PA
25289 FRVBC 13-Red 1458 18-18 50% 13 CO
25290 Athlete HQ 17-Conley 1458 15-23 39% 17 OH
25291 LES 12 BellaKate 1458 9-7 50% 12 AL
25292 RVC Angels 10 1458 5-11 25% 10 TX
25293 XTEAM 14-Knights 1458 2-5 29% 14 CA
25294 Cobra 16-Black 1458 9-9 43% 16 MA
25295 Mid Coast 16-2 1458 9-7 56% 16 CA
25296 LAVA West 16-Premier so 1458 30-23 57% 16 CA
25297 575 13-Pcr derick 1458 20-17 54% 13 GA
25298 FVA 12-Ember - a2 1458 5-6 45% 12 AK
25299 Moorhead Juniors 16-2 1458 11-11 46% 16 ND
25300 Surge 13-2 ew 1458 2-3 40% 13 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.