Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 507 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25301 Cool City 17-S thornton 1458 11-9 55% 17 WI
25302 ITVC 16-Chris (NC) 1458 23-23 50% 16 CA
25303 EVC 16-1 1458 1-3 25% 16 SD
25304 Kids America 11-R johnson 1458 2-3 40% 11 OH
25305 Nestor Starlings 16-Luis 1458 23-26 47% 16 CA
25306 NIVA 14 RUBY 1458 20-22 48% 14 IN
25307 WI Flight 13 Slate 1458 2-6 25% 13 WI
25308 WHHF 15-Moxie 1458 5-5 50% 15 LA
25309 Kaimana 14-1 1458 3-3 50% 14 HI
25310 Net Force 14-Attack 1458 2-3 33% 14 IA
25311 Bristol Crush 16-Scott 1458 11-10 48% 16 CT
25312 i9 Sports 15 1458 1-1 50% 15 FL
25313 BW HEAT 17-1 1458 7-7 47% 17 WI
25314 NOVA Juniors 11-S navy 1458 1-3 25% 11 OH
25315 BWB 15-2 1458 2-3 40% 15 IL
25316 Dunes 13-Aqua 1458 2-2 50% 13 IN
25317 Endless 17-Navy 1458 12-13 44% 17 TX
25318 Tsunami 12-1r 1458 19-15 56% 12 GA
25319 Renegades 18 Adidas 1458 15-12 56% 18 TX
25320 MVP 60450 12-Spring 1458 3-4 43% 12 IL
25321 716 United VBC 13 1458 2-3 40% 13 NY
25322 DJRVB 10-R 1458 1-3 25% 10 IN
25323 Fr Challenge Elite 11-Royal 1458 3-5 38% 11 TX
25324 OK Premier 16 Diamonds 1458 31-27 53% 16 OK
25325 Sicangu 14-Black 1458 2-3 40% 14 SD
25326 LAVBC 15-BLACK 1458 20-29 41% 15 CA
25327 HO'OPA 18 1458 2-2 33% 18 HI
25328 NWI Premier NWI 17-Black 1458 2-3 40% 17 IA
25329 Lonestar Thunder 11-White 1458 5-5 50% 11 TX
25330 HF Volleyball 16-1 1458 30-30 48% 16 TN
25331 AP 13-Lite atomic 1458 10-9 53% 13 TX
25332 Hana Hou 18-1 ward 1458 8-7 53% 18 HI
25333 DIG 13-White-anne 1458 7-9 35% 13 TX
25334 LVBC 15-1 1458 23-27 46% 15 CO
25335 UNO Girls 13-Blue 1458 10-9 53% 13 IL
25336 EXCEL 13-National gold 1458 9-23 24% 13 TX
25337 Iowa United IC Westside 16 1458 3-3 50% 16 IA
25338 Mana Toa 15-Jayson 1458 13-13 50% 15 AL
25339 Club V 14-Prodigy audrey 1458 23-34 38% 14 UT
25340 Shockwave 12 1458 2-4 33% 12 WA
25341 Legacy 12-Elite west 1458 22-22 50% 12 MI
25342 HV United VBC 12-Blue 1458 3-2 60% 12 MI
25343 Club V South 14-Kenzie 1458 20-19 47% 14 UT
25344 purple storm 13-3 1458 1-1 25% 13 TN
25345 ACEE 15-Rise 1458 4-8 29% 15 NY
25346 Integrity Elite 11-Black 1458 6-5 46% 11 IL
25347 CVH SELECT 16-2 1458 2-3 40% 16 PR
25348 Club GSL 14-Elite - kiera/sophie 1458 14-25 35% 14 UT
25349 Apex Volleyball Club 14-Eclipse 1458 3-4 43% 14 MO
25350 Madtown 12-White 1458 1-2 25% 12 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.