Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 508 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25351 SVBC Spirit 15-Elite 1458 1-5 17% 15 IA
25352 IA VIBE 15-1 nike 1458 4-6 40% 15 IA
25353 Avalanche 13-Leslie 1458 27-32 46% 13 AZ
25354 BAVA 12 Twisters 1458 19-22 40% 12 MD
25355 SRVC Hurricanes 12 1458 17-17 43% 12 MD
25356 NMBVB 12-Isa 1458 8-8 50% 12 FL
25357 Aultman Volleyball Academy 17-Elite 1458 5-5 50% 17 LA
25358 BRVC 16-2 1458 19-17 53% 16 KY
25359 SUSA 12-Red 1458 1-2 25% 12 UT
25360 Club Fusion 12-Fire 1458 2-4 33% 12 UT
25361 DCVA 14-2 1458 2-3 29% 14 CO
25362 InfinitySouth 13-2 1458 16-16 50% 13 LA
25363 MVA Sapphire Black's 14 1458 6-14 25% 14 MT
25364 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 13 Weber Elite Jon 1458 4-6 40% 13 UT
25365 Dunes 11-Wt 1458 6-6 50% 11 IN
25366 SEVC 17-1 1458 6-10 38% 17 IN
25367 Empire 12-Beverly 1458 2-3 40% 12 CA
25368 Northern Impact 18 1458 3-4 43% 18 MN
25369 MN Select 18-3 1458 23-29 44% 18 MN
25370 Lady Herd 18-Purple 1458 3-6 33% 18 WY
25371 Aspire NW 13-3 beaverton 1458 16-13 55% 13 OR
25372 Piedmont VBC 14-Jdi 1458 25-20 56% 14 NC
25373 Velocity Volleyball Club 15-Black 1457 3-4 43% 15 AR
25374 Sunshine 14-Power 1457 18-15 55% 14 CA
25375 FPVC 14-Ren 2 1457 13-16 45% 14 CA
25376 Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 16-2 1457 10-10 50% 16 MN
25377 Prime Performance 15-National 1457 12-41 23% 15 AZ
25378 RMVC 15-1 1457 3-5 38% 15 NV
25379 Decatur Hawks Elite 12 Decatur Elite Gold (HO) (1) 1457 2-2 50% 12 IN
25380 Driven 12-Navy 1457 16-13 55% 12 FL
25381 IVBA 16-Black 1457 11-17 39% 16 MS
25382 Santa Barbara Volleyball Club 12-Premier 1457 15-19 44% 12 CA
25383 CI Spikers 12 CI Spikers - D Black Team 1457 3-3 50% 12 MN
25384 Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 14-2 1457 15-17 47% 14 MN
25385 Shakopee 14-2 1457 12-11 50% 14 MN
25386 PO1NT 17-1 national 1457 28-24 54% 17 OH
25387 REAL Sports 16-Green 1457 8-8 50% 16 NC
25388 NCVC 16-Mizuno 1457 13-26 33% 16 CA
25389 LAVA Islands 16-Premier tim 1457 14-21 40% 16 CA
25390 Mass Premier 14-2 blue 1457 21-17 55% 14 MA
25391 NPJ Seattle 13-Orange 1457 27-32 46% 13 WA
25392 NCVC 12-Rush - black 1457 10-12 33% 12 NY
25393 ABV Flash 15-S - dave 1457 10-9 53% 15 CA
25394 Tropical Touch 15-Fealofani 1457 22-20 52% 15 CA
25395 SEVA 15-White wendy 1457 2-2 50% 15 NC
25396 GSL 14-Comp kimber 1457 2-5 29% 14 UT
25397 540 VB 13-Navy 1457 13-8 62% 13 VA
25398 Kaimana 18-S 1457 11-11 50% 18 HI
25399 CHAOS GIRLS 18-Elite 1457 2-3 40% 18 HI
25400 Maverick 12-Silver 1457 11-18 38% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.