Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 485 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24201 PANA'EWA 18 1468 2-3 29% 18 HI
24202 BSVBC 12-Gray 1468 20-24 43% 12 IL
24203 DBQ Elite Gold 17 1468 2-3 40% 17 IA
24204 UVC 12-Matt 1468 2-3 40% 12 IL
24205 Bayside Vipers 13-2 1468 14-14 50% 13 NY
24206 Reign 18-Black 1468 31-33 48% 18 FL
24207 SCBandits 15-2 1468 5-5 50% 15 ON
24208 NOVA Juniors 13-S maroon 1468 5-6 45% 13 OH
24209 North Fork 14-Black 1468 1-2 33% 14 CO
24210 GSI 16-Lime bf 1468 25-23 52% 16 FL
24211 Madtown 14-3 select 1468 25-22 53% 14 WI
24212 Cobra 14-White 1468 7-10 41% 14 MA
24213 CCVC 12 1468 13-10 57% 12 WY
24214 TX Legends 15-Blue 1468 14-9 48% 15 TX
24215 Wildfire 14-Emilio 1468 17-17 50% 14 FL
24216 TrailblazersVBC 14-R stahr 1468 1-3 25% 14 OH
24217 SA TRIBE 11 1468 8-6 47% 11 TX
24218 PVA 12-3 1468 2-3 33% 12 MO
24219 FVA 12-Ember - a3 1468 6-6 50% 12 AK
24220 MoCo Jrs 15 Molten 1468 22-19 52% 15 TX
24221 Crush 15 1468 16-11 59% 15 SC
24222 GenX Volleyball 13 12 1468 2-2 50% 12 FL
24223 Keahi 17 1468 7-5 50% 17 UT
24224 Ethos 18 Impact 1468 24-15 62% 18 TN
24225 Cap City 15-Gold 1468 22-22 50% 15 NC
24226 Tehachapi Starlings 13-S - eryn 1468 12-15 44% 13 CA
24227 FCA Clark 14-Elevate 1468 13-16 45% 14 OR
24228 Athena 13-Christian 1468 18-21 46% 13 CA
24229 CSVC 15-White 1468 8-7 53% 15 NC
24230 ECVC 13-White 1468 13-18 42% 13 VA
24231 Heat 17-Red 1468 6-4 60% 17 WI
24232 Truepoint 14-S 1468 20-29 41% 14 TX
24233 NEPA ELITE 17-Storm 1468 28-21 57% 17 PA
24234 Destiny 14-Katie/mel 1468 14-11 56% 14 TX
24235 Club North Volleyball KC 14-2 1468 2-3 40% 14 MO
24236 Criollas 15-2 1468 4-2 67% 15 PR
24237 SA Empire 18 Legacy 1468 28-22 56% 18 TX
24238 Hallsville Volleyball Club 14-Black 1468 1-2 20% 14 TX
24239 603 United 15-Seacoast blue 1468 14-14 50% 15 NH
24240 Quicksets VBC 16-1 1468 17-16 52% 16 HI
24241 FRST VOLLEYBALL 15-2 yellow 1468 13-12 52% 15 TX
24242 Legacy 16 Legacy Price 1468 2-3 40% 16
24243 DVVC 13-1 1468 3-4 43% 13 NV
24244 Pono 15-2 megan 1468 22-23 48% 15 NV
24245 Mets 13-2 andy 1468 4-7 36% 13 PR
24246 GSA 15-Taylor 1468 2-3 40% 15 CA
24247 Tall City 14-1 1468 10-16 37% 14 TX
24248 ELevation Elite 15-1 1468 17-17 50% 15 CA
24249 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 16-Silver 1468 21-25 46% 16 CO
24250 CVC 14-Green 1468 32-33 45% 14 ND
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.