2025-2026 Season — Page 485 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24201 | PANA'EWA 18 | 1468 | 2-3 | 29% | 18 | HI |
| 24202 | BSVBC 12-Gray | 1468 | 20-24 | 43% | 12 | IL |
| 24203 | DBQ Elite Gold 17 | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | IA |
| 24204 | UVC 12-Matt | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | IL |
| 24205 | Bayside Vipers 13-2 | 1468 | 14-14 | 50% | 13 | NY |
| 24206 | Reign 18-Black | 1468 | 31-33 | 48% | 18 | FL |
| 24207 | SCBandits 15-2 | 1468 | 5-5 | 50% | 15 | ON |
| 24208 | NOVA Juniors 13-S maroon | 1468 | 5-6 | 45% | 13 | OH |
| 24209 | North Fork 14-Black | 1468 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | CO |
| 24210 | GSI 16-Lime bf | 1468 | 25-23 | 52% | 16 | FL |
| 24211 | Madtown 14-3 select | 1468 | 25-22 | 53% | 14 | WI |
| 24212 | Cobra 14-White | 1468 | 7-10 | 41% | 14 | MA |
| 24213 | CCVC 12 | 1468 | 13-10 | 57% | 12 | WY |
| 24214 | TX Legends 15-Blue | 1468 | 14-9 | 48% | 15 | TX |
| 24215 | Wildfire 14-Emilio | 1468 | 17-17 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 24216 | TrailblazersVBC 14-R stahr | 1468 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | OH |
| 24217 | SA TRIBE 11 | 1468 | 8-6 | 47% | 11 | TX |
| 24218 | PVA 12-3 | 1468 | 2-3 | 33% | 12 | MO |
| 24219 | FVA 12-Ember - a3 | 1468 | 6-6 | 50% | 12 | AK |
| 24220 | MoCo Jrs 15 Molten | 1468 | 22-19 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 24221 | Crush 15 | 1468 | 16-11 | 59% | 15 | SC |
| 24222 | GenX Volleyball 13 12 | 1468 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | FL |
| 24223 | Keahi 17 | 1468 | 7-5 | 50% | 17 | UT |
| 24224 | Ethos 18 Impact | 1468 | 24-15 | 62% | 18 | TN |
| 24225 | Cap City 15-Gold | 1468 | 22-22 | 50% | 15 | NC |
| 24226 | Tehachapi Starlings 13-S - eryn | 1468 | 12-15 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 24227 | FCA Clark 14-Elevate | 1468 | 13-16 | 45% | 14 | OR |
| 24228 | Athena 13-Christian | 1468 | 18-21 | 46% | 13 | CA |
| 24229 | CSVC 15-White | 1468 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | NC |
| 24230 | ECVC 13-White | 1468 | 13-18 | 42% | 13 | VA |
| 24231 | Heat 17-Red | 1468 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | WI |
| 24232 | Truepoint 14-S | 1468 | 20-29 | 41% | 14 | TX |
| 24233 | NEPA ELITE 17-Storm | 1468 | 28-21 | 57% | 17 | PA |
| 24234 | Destiny 14-Katie/mel | 1468 | 14-11 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 24235 | Club North Volleyball KC 14-2 | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MO |
| 24236 | Criollas 15-2 | 1468 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | PR |
| 24237 | SA Empire 18 Legacy | 1468 | 28-22 | 56% | 18 | TX |
| 24238 | Hallsville Volleyball Club 14-Black | 1468 | 1-2 | 20% | 14 | TX |
| 24239 | 603 United 15-Seacoast blue | 1468 | 14-14 | 50% | 15 | NH |
| 24240 | Quicksets VBC 16-1 | 1468 | 17-16 | 52% | 16 | HI |
| 24241 | FRST VOLLEYBALL 15-2 yellow | 1468 | 13-12 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 24242 | Legacy 16 Legacy Price | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | |
| 24243 | DVVC 13-1 | 1468 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | NV |
| 24244 | Pono 15-2 megan | 1468 | 22-23 | 48% | 15 | NV |
| 24245 | Mets 13-2 andy | 1468 | 4-7 | 36% | 13 | PR |
| 24246 | GSA 15-Taylor | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 24247 | Tall City 14-1 | 1468 | 10-16 | 37% | 14 | TX |
| 24248 | ELevation Elite 15-1 | 1468 | 17-17 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 24249 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 16-Silver | 1468 | 21-25 | 46% | 16 | CO |
| 24250 | CVC 14-Green | 1468 | 32-33 | 45% | 14 | ND |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.