Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 484 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24151 Elkhart 10-Blue 1469 2-2 50% 10 IN
24152 SA Force 11 Darkside 1469 17-15 52% 11 TX
24153 LCVC 16 (NO) 1469 3-3 43% 16 MN
24154 HBJ 15-Kate 1468 2-3 40% 15 AR
24155 AVA TX 13-Select 1468 6-6 50% 13 TX
24156 Unified 16-1 1468 20-41 33% 16 MI
24157 BSVBC 13-Silver 1468 13-7 65% 13 IL
24158 Metro Volleyball Club 15-South fx 1468 16-18 41% 15 DC
24159 SVA Girls 15 1468 23-14 62% 15 CO
24160 RCVC 13-Black 1468 4-5 44% 13 NC
24161 Liberty 15-National red 1468 23-24 46% 15 TX
24162 No Limits 16-Elitie 1468 0-1 0% 16 NV
24163 Idaho Peak GRACE 15-S 1468 2-6 25% 15 UT
24164 347 Volleyball 14 1468 7-6 54% 14 AZ
24165 GAVA 15 1468 4-5 29% 15 UT
24166 Precision 14-X 1468 1-2 33% 14 IL
24167 VPS 13-1 1468 3-4 43% 13 PR
24168 Nevis 17 1468 3-2 60% 17 MN
24169 Lineshot Volleyball Club 13 13 Pink American 1468 5-5 50% 13 OH
24170 Philly Starlings 15-2 1468 4-3 50% 15 PA
24171 IVC 13-Anasha 1468 8-9 42% 13 AK
24172 Michio Chicago 14-Pistons 1468 2-4 33% 14 IL
24173 Tamales 15-2 1468 2-3 40% 15 MO
24174 MVP 13-Regional black 1468 7-9 39% 13 TX
24175 Attack VBC 13-S black 1468 21-12 64% 13 MI
24176 Team Yakima 14-Summit 1468 19-21 48% 14 WA
24177 575 14-Car jordan 1468 20-17 54% 14 GA
24178 BAE 18-1 jhunel 1468 3-4 43% 18 NV
24179 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 16 Weber Elite Cary 1468 2-2 50% 16 UT
24180 A5 Gwinnett 14-4 1468 2-3 40% 14 GA
24181 NCVC 17-National 1468 4-4 50% 17 MA
24182 Prime 16-1 taylor 1468 2-6 25% 16 CA
24183 VoltageVB 13 1468 8-7 53% 13 FL
24184 Kamikaze 12-David 1468 18-25 42% 12 CA
24185 Ortonville 16 1468 5-5 50% 16 MN
24186 SEVC Dulaney 16-2 1468 16-15 52% 16 AL
24187 Platinum 14-1 1468 2-2 50% 14 NE
24188 Eastview Lightning 12-1 1468 19-27 41% 12 MN
24189 EnERgy 11 1468 1-3 25% 11 MN
24190 LAVA South 18-Premier 1468 19-18 51% 18 CA
24191 Pipeline 18-Ultra 1468 8-10 44% 18 CA
24192 Red Rock 12-Jenn - walnut creek 1468 10-20 33% 12 CA
24193 ECEVBC 14 Twisters 1468 24-22 49% 14 MD
24194 SNVF 17-Thunder 1468 29-36 43% 17 WA
24195 Shockwaves 14-Premier 1468 1-1 25% 14 MT
24196 SDVBC 17-Tim 1468 33-26 56% 17 CA
24197 BVA 12 Elite 1468 10-11 48% 12 NC
24198 MVC 16-1 (CA) 1468 13-13 50% 16 CA
24199 RCVC 12 1468 1-2 33% 12 NC
24200 Apex 12-3 girls 1468 9-12 43% 12 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.