2025-2026 Season — Page 484 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24151 | Elkhart 10-Blue | 1469 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | IN |
| 24152 | SA Force 11 Darkside | 1469 | 17-15 | 52% | 11 | TX |
| 24153 | LCVC 16 (NO) | 1469 | 3-3 | 43% | 16 | MN |
| 24154 | HBJ 15-Kate | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | AR |
| 24155 | AVA TX 13-Select | 1468 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | TX |
| 24156 | Unified 16-1 | 1468 | 20-41 | 33% | 16 | MI |
| 24157 | BSVBC 13-Silver | 1468 | 13-7 | 65% | 13 | IL |
| 24158 | Metro Volleyball Club 15-South fx | 1468 | 16-18 | 41% | 15 | DC |
| 24159 | SVA Girls 15 | 1468 | 23-14 | 62% | 15 | CO |
| 24160 | RCVC 13-Black | 1468 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | NC |
| 24161 | Liberty 15-National red | 1468 | 23-24 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 24162 | No Limits 16-Elitie | 1468 | 0-1 | 0% | 16 | NV |
| 24163 | Idaho Peak GRACE 15-S | 1468 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | UT |
| 24164 | 347 Volleyball 14 | 1468 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | AZ |
| 24165 | GAVA 15 | 1468 | 4-5 | 29% | 15 | UT |
| 24166 | Precision 14-X | 1468 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 24167 | VPS 13-1 | 1468 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | PR |
| 24168 | Nevis 17 | 1468 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | MN |
| 24169 | Lineshot Volleyball Club 13 13 Pink American | 1468 | 5-5 | 50% | 13 | OH |
| 24170 | Philly Starlings 15-2 | 1468 | 4-3 | 50% | 15 | PA |
| 24171 | IVC 13-Anasha | 1468 | 8-9 | 42% | 13 | AK |
| 24172 | Michio Chicago 14-Pistons | 1468 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 24173 | Tamales 15-2 | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | MO |
| 24174 | MVP 13-Regional black | 1468 | 7-9 | 39% | 13 | TX |
| 24175 | Attack VBC 13-S black | 1468 | 21-12 | 64% | 13 | MI |
| 24176 | Team Yakima 14-Summit | 1468 | 19-21 | 48% | 14 | WA |
| 24177 | 575 14-Car jordan | 1468 | 20-17 | 54% | 14 | GA |
| 24178 | BAE 18-1 jhunel | 1468 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | NV |
| 24179 | Weber Elite Volleyball Club 16 Weber Elite Cary | 1468 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | UT |
| 24180 | A5 Gwinnett 14-4 | 1468 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | GA |
| 24181 | NCVC 17-National | 1468 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | MA |
| 24182 | Prime 16-1 taylor | 1468 | 2-6 | 25% | 16 | CA |
| 24183 | VoltageVB 13 | 1468 | 8-7 | 53% | 13 | FL |
| 24184 | Kamikaze 12-David | 1468 | 18-25 | 42% | 12 | CA |
| 24185 | Ortonville 16 | 1468 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 24186 | SEVC Dulaney 16-2 | 1468 | 16-15 | 52% | 16 | AL |
| 24187 | Platinum 14-1 | 1468 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 24188 | Eastview Lightning 12-1 | 1468 | 19-27 | 41% | 12 | MN |
| 24189 | EnERgy 11 | 1468 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | MN |
| 24190 | LAVA South 18-Premier | 1468 | 19-18 | 51% | 18 | CA |
| 24191 | Pipeline 18-Ultra | 1468 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | CA |
| 24192 | Red Rock 12-Jenn - walnut creek | 1468 | 10-20 | 33% | 12 | CA |
| 24193 | ECEVBC 14 Twisters | 1468 | 24-22 | 49% | 14 | MD |
| 24194 | SNVF 17-Thunder | 1468 | 29-36 | 43% | 17 | WA |
| 24195 | Shockwaves 14-Premier | 1468 | 1-1 | 25% | 14 | MT |
| 24196 | SDVBC 17-Tim | 1468 | 33-26 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 24197 | BVA 12 Elite | 1468 | 10-11 | 48% | 12 | NC |
| 24198 | MVC 16-1 (CA) | 1468 | 13-13 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 24199 | RCVC 12 | 1468 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | NC |
| 24200 | Apex 12-3 girls | 1468 | 9-12 | 43% | 12 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.