2025-2026 Season — Page 483 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24101 | DME Elite 15-1 | 1469 | 28-45 | 38% | 15 | FL |
| 24102 | Mizuno M1 15-2 | 1469 | 28-41 | 41% | 15 | MN |
| 24103 | LV Force VB 16-White | 1469 | 23-28 | 45% | 16 | PA |
| 24104 | Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 16-Reggie | 1469 | 24-44 | 34% | 16 | VA |
| 24105 | Diggin VBA 15-S red | 1469 | 14-12 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 24106 | Schuylkill Eclipse 18-Solar | 1469 | 4-8 | 29% | 18 | PA |
| 24107 | Hard Hitters 15-Black | 1469 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 24108 | Apex 15-National red | 1469 | 4-9 | 31% | 15 | MO |
| 24109 | Michigan Volleyball Academy 15-White | 1469 | 5-5 | 50% | 15 | MI |
| 24110 | Mission 4:10 Volleyball 16 Fearless (Deut. 31:6) (CH) | 1469 | 20-18 | 53% | 16 | |
| 24111 | K1 Bayamon David 11-21 | 1469 | 1-4 | 20% | 11 | PR |
| 24112 | DCVA 15-2 | 1469 | 4-8 | 29% | 15 | NM |
| 24113 | NE Velocity 16-2 | 1469 | 8-7 | 53% | 16 | MN |
| 24114 | Ne Jrs 12-Red | 1469 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | NE |
| 24115 | Vienna Elite 16-Black | 1469 | 33-29 | 52% | 16 | VA |
| 24116 | KC Force 16-Black | 1469 | 13-9 | 59% | 16 | MO |
| 24117 | NE Elite 14-Platinum | 1469 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | NE |
| 24118 | OK Charge 11-1 stillwater | 1469 | 15-16 | 48% | 11 | OK |
| 24119 | Bemidji 16-Lacy | 1469 | 9-8 | 53% | 16 | ND |
| 24120 | CIA 17-Silver | 1469 | 16-16 | 48% | 17 | IA |
| 24121 | Synergy Elite 17 | 1469 | 2-5 | 22% | 17 | IA |
| 24122 | Saratoga Thoroughbred Volleyball Club 14-Blue | 1469 | 24-21 | 46% | 14 | NY |
| 24123 | Twisters 14-Abby | 1469 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 24124 | Highland County Volleyball Club 16 16 Stone | 1469 | 10-10 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 24125 | Top Flight AZ 14-Hera | 1469 | 23-23 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 24126 | Hollywood Elite 17-N | 1469 | 17-16 | 52% | 17 | OH |
| 24127 | United 16-White | 1469 | 14-12 | 54% | 16 | AL |
| 24128 | JM 12-Orange | 1469 | 0-1 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 24129 | APEX1 16-Green | 1469 | 22-27 | 45% | 16 | CA |
| 24130 | NW Stars 14-Blue | 1469 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | WI |
| 24131 | Northern Storm 14-1 | 1469 | 10-10 | 50% | 14 | WI |
| 24132 | GVJ 14-Courtney | 1469 | 13-8 | 62% | 14 | AZ |
| 24133 | Lakers 18 | 1469 | 3-4 | 23% | 18 | NY |
| 24134 | SG Elite 16 Thunder | 1469 | 29-23 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 24135 | SA Spartans 16-1 | 1469 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | TX |
| 24136 | Insanity Volleyball 15-2 | 1469 | 17-16 | 52% | 15 | TN |
| 24137 | Arete 12-Prep green | 1469 | 7-6 | 47% | 12 | TX |
| 24138 | Dominate 16-1 | 1469 | 19-12 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 24139 | DCVA 12-2 | 1469 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | CO |
| 24140 | Legacy 13-1 (FL) | 1469 | 6-9 | 40% | 13 | FL |
| 24141 | CLUB GEMINI 12-Stars | 1469 | 10-12 | 37% | 12 | MO |
| 24142 | Jtown Juniors 14-White | 1469 | 15-16 | 47% | 14 | AR |
| 24143 | Legacy 12-Grey | 1469 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | MI |
| 24144 | Crank It 12-Ns | 1469 | 14-11 | 56% | 12 | MI |
| 24145 | Chaska Juniors 11-1 | 1469 | 18-19 | 47% | 11 | MN |
| 24146 | Central MN Rapids 11-Leah | 1469 | 2-6 | 25% | 11 | MN |
| 24147 | BAVA 14-Storm | 1469 | 22-22 | 46% | 14 | MD |
| 24148 | Legacy 11-Select west | 1469 | 20-19 | 51% | 11 | MI |
| 24149 | WINDTHORST 17-Impact | 1469 | 4-4 | 40% | 17 | TX |
| 24150 | The Edge 15-Black (RM) | 1469 | 26-34 | 43% | 15 | CO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.