2025-2026 Season — Page 486 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24251 | IMUA UVC 14-Silver | 1468 | 13-9 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 24252 | Heroes 15-Delta | 1468 | 21-23 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 24253 | Crossfire 15-Gold | 1468 | 7-12 | 37% | 15 | MN |
| 24254 | Midwest United 15 Navy | 1468 | 26-32 | 45% | 15 | MN |
| 24255 | Kershaw County Juniors 12 KCJV Kidz Power (PM) (10) | 1468 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | SC |
| 24256 | NK 14-Gray | 1468 | 2-1 | 33% | 14 | ND |
| 24257 | Mo Mighty Piranhas 14-1 | 1468 | 12-4 | 71% | 14 | MO |
| 24258 | LV 14-Storm | 1468 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 24259 | SPIKES 13-Jumpstart | 1468 | 11-15 | 42% | 13 | CO |
| 24260 | T4VBC 10-Grey | 1467 | 1-2 | 33% | 10 | TX |
| 24261 | ARSEL 12-1 | 1467 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | PR |
| 24262 | The Edge 16-Black kathleen | 1467 | 12-15 | 44% | 16 | CO |
| 24263 | Diggin VBA 11-Black | 1467 | 6-7 | 38% | 11 | TX |
| 24264 | 540 VB 15 Navy | 1467 | 17-18 | 49% | 15 | VA |
| 24265 | KKVC 16-Ne | 1467 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | SD |
| 24266 | Alliance 11-Regional | 1467 | 15-16 | 48% | 11 | TN |
| 24267 | 417 MoJrs 15-Reg black | 1467 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | MO |
| 24268 | PAEVA 12-Select | 1467 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | PA |
| 24269 | Elevate Athletics 17-2 | 1467 | 16-25 | 39% | 17 | UT |
| 24270 | Downstate 13-Black | 1467 | 14-16 | 47% | 13 | NY |
| 24271 | Redline Zia VBC 14-2 | 1467 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CO |
| 24272 | Downstate 16-Vipers | 1467 | 15-20 | 43% | 16 | NY |
| 24273 | Rapid Fire 10-Purple | 1467 | 6-9 | 40% | 10 | IL |
| 24274 | NJVBC 16-Arsenal | 1467 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | PA |
| 24275 | LIV 11-Royal sierra | 1467 | 13-20 | 39% | 11 | CA |
| 24276 | Texas Prime 15-2 | 1467 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | TX |
| 24277 | PRVC 14-Ashton | 1467 | 9-15 | 38% | 14 | WY |
| 24278 | AZ SKY 15-N3 | 1467 | 24-21 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 24279 | New Waves 11-Kale | 1467 | 6-6 | 50% | 11 | FL |
| 24280 | CCVA 14-Power | 1467 | 8-12 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 24281 | Independent 12-Miltenberger | 1467 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | IN |
| 24282 | Trailblazers 12-Diamondbacks | 1467 | 8-8 | 50% | 12 | IN |
| 24283 | Club Velocity 16-2 | 1467 | 12-8 | 60% | 16 | MN |
| 24284 | Southern Storm 16-1 | 1467 | 20-24 | 45% | 16 | MN |
| 24285 | Impact 16-Ignite | 1467 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | MN |
| 24286 | FUSION 13-White (NO) | 1467 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | MN |
| 24287 | Big City 14-Elite | 1467 | 36-35 | 51% | 14 | NY |
| 24288 | ForceVC 16-3 | 1467 | 23-21 | 52% | 16 | OH |
| 24289 | Apex Volleyball Academy 16 APEX Cochran/Ward (OV) | 1467 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 24290 | Kansas Volleyball Club 14-2 | 1467 | 3-2 | 30% | 14 | KS |
| 24291 | Spokane Elite VBC 18 Spokane Elite VBC (EV) | 1467 | 15-12 | 56% | 18 | |
| 24292 | TSUNAMI 16-1 | 1467 | 13-13 | 50% | 16 | OR |
| 24293 | WSRVC 18-Heather | 1467 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | WY |
| 24294 | Molten 14-Blue | 1467 | 12-8 | 60% | 14 | AZ |
| 24295 | WI Shock 14-Pink | 1467 | 12-12 | 50% | 14 | WI |
| 24296 | Starlings 4C 18 | 1467 | 12-6 | 67% | 18 | AZ |
| 24297 | Hoosier Elite Hammerheads 16-1 | 1467 | 33-50 | 40% | 16 | IN |
| 24298 | GRV 16-White-2 | 1467 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | IN |
| 24299 | Crossfire 14-Gold | 1467 | 3-7 | 30% | 14 | MN |
| 24300 | KPV 17-White-mallory | 1467 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | KY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.