Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 486 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24251 IMUA UVC 14-Silver 1468 13-9 59% 14 CA
24252 Heroes 15-Delta 1468 21-23 46% 15 TX
24253 Crossfire 15-Gold 1468 7-12 37% 15 MN
24254 Midwest United 15 Navy 1468 26-32 45% 15 MN
24255 Kershaw County Juniors 12 KCJV Kidz Power (PM) (10) 1468 2-2 50% 12 SC
24256 NK 14-Gray 1468 2-1 33% 14 ND
24257 Mo Mighty Piranhas 14-1 1468 12-4 71% 14 MO
24258 LV 14-Storm 1468 3-3 50% 14 TX
24259 SPIKES 13-Jumpstart 1468 11-15 42% 13 CO
24260 T4VBC 10-Grey 1467 1-2 33% 10 TX
24261 ARSEL 12-1 1467 4-3 57% 12 PR
24262 The Edge 16-Black kathleen 1467 12-15 44% 16 CO
24263 Diggin VBA 11-Black 1467 6-7 38% 11 TX
24264 540 VB 15 Navy 1467 17-18 49% 15 VA
24265 KKVC 16-Ne 1467 2-3 40% 16 SD
24266 Alliance 11-Regional 1467 15-16 48% 11 TN
24267 417 MoJrs 15-Reg black 1467 5-4 56% 15 MO
24268 PAEVA 12-Select 1467 6-5 55% 12 PA
24269 Elevate Athletics 17-2 1467 16-25 39% 17 UT
24270 Downstate 13-Black 1467 14-16 47% 13 NY
24271 Redline Zia VBC 14-2 1467 0-0 0% 14 CO
24272 Downstate 16-Vipers 1467 15-20 43% 16 NY
24273 Rapid Fire 10-Purple 1467 6-9 40% 10 IL
24274 NJVBC 16-Arsenal 1467 4-4 50% 16 PA
24275 LIV 11-Royal sierra 1467 13-20 39% 11 CA
24276 Texas Prime 15-2 1467 1-2 33% 15 TX
24277 PRVC 14-Ashton 1467 9-15 38% 14 WY
24278 AZ SKY 15-N3 1467 24-21 53% 15 AZ
24279 New Waves 11-Kale 1467 6-6 50% 11 FL
24280 CCVA 14-Power 1467 8-12 40% 14 CA
24281 Independent 12-Miltenberger 1467 2-2 50% 12 IN
24282 Trailblazers 12-Diamondbacks 1467 8-8 50% 12 IN
24283 Club Velocity 16-2 1467 12-8 60% 16 MN
24284 Southern Storm 16-1 1467 20-24 45% 16 MN
24285 Impact 16-Ignite 1467 2-3 40% 16 MN
24286 FUSION 13-White (NO) 1467 2-4 33% 13 MN
24287 Big City 14-Elite 1467 36-35 51% 14 NY
24288 ForceVC 16-3 1467 23-21 52% 16 OH
24289 Apex Volleyball Academy 16 APEX Cochran/Ward (OV) 1467 2-2 50% 16 OH
24290 Kansas Volleyball Club 14-2 1467 3-2 30% 14 KS
24291 Spokane Elite VBC 18 Spokane Elite VBC (EV) 1467 15-12 56% 18
24292 TSUNAMI 16-1 1467 13-13 50% 16 OR
24293 WSRVC 18-Heather 1467 3-2 60% 18 WY
24294 Molten 14-Blue 1467 12-8 60% 14 AZ
24295 WI Shock 14-Pink 1467 12-12 50% 14 WI
24296 Starlings 4C 18 1467 12-6 67% 18 AZ
24297 Hoosier Elite Hammerheads 16-1 1467 33-50 40% 16 IN
24298 GRV 16-White-2 1467 1-4 20% 16 IN
24299 Crossfire 14-Gold 1467 3-7 30% 14 MN
24300 KPV 17-White-mallory 1467 19-22 46% 17 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.