Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 487 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24301 UVA 17-Chloe 1467 21-28 43% 17 CA
24302 Onyx Volleyball Club 17-Sapphire 1467 16-11 59% 17 CA
24303 SMV 12 Sparks 1467 5-6 45% 12 MN
24304 Club V 16-Shanna 1467 20-16 53% 16 UT
24305 Clarksville VBC 14 Paola 1467 18-15 53% 14 TN
24306 Ballistic 18 1467 6-4 60% 18 MI
24307 Club 801 15-National myah 1467 13-42 24% 15 UT
24308 BAMVC 14-Pink 1467 31-21 60% 14 KY
24309 TVC 14-Royal 1467 21-33 39% 14 OH
24310 New WAVE 16 Tornado 1467 24-16 60% 16 IL
24311 Shores 13-1 1467 2-2 50% 13 GA
24312 LCHV 14-Ember 1467 14-10 58% 14 FL
24313 Tribe 14-Premier navy 1467 19-22 46% 14 FL
24314 SVBC Blazers 14 Emma 1467 14-15 48% 14 SC
24315 Vibe 17-Avery 1467 16-14 53% 17 GA
24316 Idaho LUV 15-Ashlyn 1467 6-12 32% 15 ID
24317 Club G1 12 Club G1 Cossatot 1467 3-2 60% 12 AR
24318 ProPlay 16 Mar 1467 26-36 42% 16 CA
24319 TX FLAMES 13U PREMIER 1467 17-19 45% 13 TX
24320 Advantage 16-White 1467 22-39 36% 16 NC
24321 Direction 16-White 1467 25-20 56% 16 NC
24322 SA Force 14-White 1467 15-14 50% 14 TX
24323 Dogie VB 12-1 1467 3-1 60% 12 MT
24324 Texas Fury 14 Bastrop 1467 20-12 63% 14 TX
24325 TX SPARKS 14-2 maiya 1467 10-12 43% 14 TX
24326 EAST TEXAS ELITE - 14-2 1467 2-3 40% 14 TX
24327 BOLTS 14-Black 1467 2-4 33% 14 IA
24328 Summit 12 1467 10-10 48% 12 MO
24329 South Volley 13-1 yorma 1467 5-4 56% 13 PR
24330 Shockwave 18-Gold 1467 9-10 47% 18 KS
24331 Essex 16 Faith 1467 19-20 49% 16 NJ
24332 Low Country 15-Chloe 1467 3-6 33% 15 SC
24333 TORCH 15-Shannon 1467 18-29 38% 15 CA
24334 Aftershock 15-Quan 1467 2-3 33% 15 CA
24335 Montana Project Spikers 16 MONTANA PROJECT SPIKERS (RM) 1467 10-5 67% 16
24336 Club Z 14-Lanaya 1467 11-15 42% 14 NM
24337 Absolute SubZero U15/U 16-Mcpops 1467 2-3 40% 16 WA
24338 Cobra 14-Gray 1467 9-6 45% 14 MA
24339 SLAM 14-N 1467 3-7 30% 14 MA
24340 Lancers 15-Scarlet 1467 2-3 40% 15 IA
24341 HOVA 11-R red 1467 2-3 40% 11 OH
24342 RVBC 15-Royal 1467 8-8 50% 15 PA
24343 Grandlake 12-Hicks 1467 1-2 33% 12 OH
24344 Lineshot Volleyball Club 12 12 Pink American (OV) (9) 1467 3-2 60% 12 OH
24345 CVC 12 ROYAL 1467 14-16 47% 12 OH
24346 Rogue330 Volleyball Club 18 18R FIRE 1467 16-17 48% 18
24347 UPONTOP 16-S national black 1467 17-13 57% 16 FL
24348 COA 13-Jaguars 1467 22-28 44% 13 IN
24349 Boston United 13-Sapphire 1467 14-11 56% 13 MA
24350 Gulfside 16-Select 1467 21-25 46% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.