Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 488 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24351 The Lab 14 1467 1-1 25% 14 IA
24352 Lanier 15-National alex 1467 38-24 61% 15 GA
24353 A5 South 16-Lj 1467 9-8 53% 16 GA
24354 Sting 14-S 1467 13-12 52% 14 AR
24355 Southern Heat 17 1467 8-10 44% 17 WI
24356 Topeka 18-2 1467 4-3 57% 18 NE
24357 Red Wing 11-Purple 1466 2-2 50% 11 MN
24358 Dig It VBC 18-2 1466 7-4 64% 18 IL
24359 AVC CLE 11 Scarlet 1466 5-3 63% 11 OH
24360 IVC Crush 16-S 1466 6-7 38% 16
24361 Ace Queens 13 1466 2-2 40% 13
24362 Kingdom KC Volleyball Club 14-1 1466 9-5 64% 14 MO
24363 SIVA 10-1 1466 3-3 50% 10 PR
24364 Bombers 13 Bombers 1466 2-3 40% 13 TX
24365 Dead Frog 13-Ella 1466 2-3 40% 13 MI
24366 Juggernaut 12-Regional 2 1466 26-24 52% 12 CO
24367 AppVC 14 Elite 1466 18-19 49% 14 NC
24368 Tribe 15-Premier navy 1466 23-41 36% 15 FL
24369 Tsunami 17-1n jenn 1466 17-19 47% 17 GA
24370 Hammerhead 15-Black 1466 15-12 54% 15 MN
24371 Freedom 11-Blue 1466 4-3 57% 11 MO
24372 Silesia Volley 15-1 1466 0-7 0% 15 FL
24373 PE 10-Stacy/monse 1466 1-1 33% 10 TX
24374 Bama Elite 13-R chameleons 1466 21-19 50% 13 AL
24375 Erie Elite Addica 14 1466 7-7 50% 14 OH
24376 Advantage 16-Black 1466 27-24 53% 16 NC
24377 NC GOLD 16-3 1466 13-10 57% 16 NC
24378 Johnston 13-Select 1466 3-2 60% 13 IA
24379 BVC 11-Candace 1466 5-7 36% 11 AL
24380 CEV Sapphire 16-1 1466 10-9 53% 16 OH
24381 Allegiance 15-Texas 1466 6-5 55% 15 TX
24382 SCV 12-White 1466 2-2 40% 12 NE
24383 Hi-Line Hit 18 1466 10-10 45% 18 MT
24384 Grandlake 16-Homan 1466 2-3 40% 16 OH
24385 Buckeyefire 16-2 1466 22-23 49% 16 OH
24386 CE Lake Charles 15-White 1466 10-8 56% 15 LA
24387 949 14-White 1466 26-25 51% 14 CA
24388 Katy United 15-Red 1466 8-8 44% 15 TX
24389 CT STARS 16-1 1466 2-3 40% 16 CT
24390 Fury Volleyball Club 14-Menkenrick 1466 3-6 33% 14 NY
24391 STC 18-1 1466 14-7 67% 18 FL
24392 TEV 13-Taylor / camille 1466 16-18 47% 13 TN
24393 Lawrence Landshark 15-Black 1466 2-5 29% 15 KS
24394 HP 14-Elite gray 1466 25-20 56% 14 MI
24395 EVOLVE 14-Black 1466 13-8 57% 14 TX
24396 TX IMPACT 14-1 hybrid 1466 7-8 41% 14 TX
24397 Invasion 16 1466 1-2 25% 16 NE
24398 TX Legends 14 Navy 1466 14-13 44% 14 TX
24399 FW Fire 14-2 white 1466 7-7 50% 14 TX
24400 Kidron VBC Turner 15 1466 2-2 50% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.