2025-2026 Season — Page 488 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24351 | The Lab 14 | 1467 | 1-1 | 25% | 14 | IA |
| 24352 | Lanier 15-National alex | 1467 | 38-24 | 61% | 15 | GA |
| 24353 | A5 South 16-Lj | 1467 | 9-8 | 53% | 16 | GA |
| 24354 | Sting 14-S | 1467 | 13-12 | 52% | 14 | AR |
| 24355 | Southern Heat 17 | 1467 | 8-10 | 44% | 17 | WI |
| 24356 | Topeka 18-2 | 1467 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | NE |
| 24357 | Red Wing 11-Purple | 1466 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | MN |
| 24358 | Dig It VBC 18-2 | 1466 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | IL |
| 24359 | AVC CLE 11 Scarlet | 1466 | 5-3 | 63% | 11 | OH |
| 24360 | IVC Crush 16-S | 1466 | 6-7 | 38% | 16 | |
| 24361 | Ace Queens 13 | 1466 | 2-2 | 40% | 13 | |
| 24362 | Kingdom KC Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1466 | 9-5 | 64% | 14 | MO |
| 24363 | SIVA 10-1 | 1466 | 3-3 | 50% | 10 | PR |
| 24364 | Bombers 13 Bombers | 1466 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | TX |
| 24365 | Dead Frog 13-Ella | 1466 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | MI |
| 24366 | Juggernaut 12-Regional 2 | 1466 | 26-24 | 52% | 12 | CO |
| 24367 | AppVC 14 Elite | 1466 | 18-19 | 49% | 14 | NC |
| 24368 | Tribe 15-Premier navy | 1466 | 23-41 | 36% | 15 | FL |
| 24369 | Tsunami 17-1n jenn | 1466 | 17-19 | 47% | 17 | GA |
| 24370 | Hammerhead 15-Black | 1466 | 15-12 | 54% | 15 | MN |
| 24371 | Freedom 11-Blue | 1466 | 4-3 | 57% | 11 | MO |
| 24372 | Silesia Volley 15-1 | 1466 | 0-7 | 0% | 15 | FL |
| 24373 | PE 10-Stacy/monse | 1466 | 1-1 | 33% | 10 | TX |
| 24374 | Bama Elite 13-R chameleons | 1466 | 21-19 | 50% | 13 | AL |
| 24375 | Erie Elite Addica 14 | 1466 | 7-7 | 50% | 14 | OH |
| 24376 | Advantage 16-Black | 1466 | 27-24 | 53% | 16 | NC |
| 24377 | NC GOLD 16-3 | 1466 | 13-10 | 57% | 16 | NC |
| 24378 | Johnston 13-Select | 1466 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | IA |
| 24379 | BVC 11-Candace | 1466 | 5-7 | 36% | 11 | AL |
| 24380 | CEV Sapphire 16-1 | 1466 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 24381 | Allegiance 15-Texas | 1466 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | TX |
| 24382 | SCV 12-White | 1466 | 2-2 | 40% | 12 | NE |
| 24383 | Hi-Line Hit 18 | 1466 | 10-10 | 45% | 18 | MT |
| 24384 | Grandlake 16-Homan | 1466 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | OH |
| 24385 | Buckeyefire 16-2 | 1466 | 22-23 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 24386 | CE Lake Charles 15-White | 1466 | 10-8 | 56% | 15 | LA |
| 24387 | 949 14-White | 1466 | 26-25 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 24388 | Katy United 15-Red | 1466 | 8-8 | 44% | 15 | TX |
| 24389 | CT STARS 16-1 | 1466 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | CT |
| 24390 | Fury Volleyball Club 14-Menkenrick | 1466 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 24391 | STC 18-1 | 1466 | 14-7 | 67% | 18 | FL |
| 24392 | TEV 13-Taylor / camille | 1466 | 16-18 | 47% | 13 | TN |
| 24393 | Lawrence Landshark 15-Black | 1466 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | KS |
| 24394 | HP 14-Elite gray | 1466 | 25-20 | 56% | 14 | MI |
| 24395 | EVOLVE 14-Black | 1466 | 13-8 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 24396 | TX IMPACT 14-1 hybrid | 1466 | 7-8 | 41% | 14 | TX |
| 24397 | Invasion 16 | 1466 | 1-2 | 25% | 16 | NE |
| 24398 | TX Legends 14 Navy | 1466 | 14-13 | 44% | 14 | TX |
| 24399 | FW Fire 14-2 white | 1466 | 7-7 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 24400 | Kidron VBC Turner 15 | 1466 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.