Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 468 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23351 Avalanche 16-Lockwood 1475 1-2 20% 16 MT
23352 Spark 16-1 juan 1475 20-22 48% 16 CA
23353 CSRA Heat 14 Gold 1475 17-22 44% 14 GA
23354 EVA 11-Green hayes 1475 11-11 50% 11 KY
23355 Elevate 12-Green spring 1475 4-2 67% 12 IL
23356 Peak Elite 15 1475 27-48 36% 15 PA
23357 SPVC 13-Girls stephanie 1475 3-3 50% 13 CA
23358 Mass Premier 14-2 white 1475 20-17 53% 14 MA
23359 Inspire CLE 10 1475 2-2 50% 10 OH
23360 Millennium 14-Scheerer 1475 17-18 49% 14 OH
23361 EPBGC 14 1475 7-8 44% 14 RI
23362 BVA 15-N luna 1475 16-24 40% 15 FL
23363 Aspire 14-2 pink 1475 21-22 49% 14 AB
23364 MAVS 816 17-1 1475 2-3 40% 17 KS
23365 A'o a Koa Volleyball 12-G 1475 13-17 43% 12 HI
23366 Starlings Lynwood 16-S atencio 1475 3-3 50% 16 CA
23367 Lakes 16 Maroon 1475 5-5 50% 16 MN
23368 Impact 17-Red wes 1475 24-26 48% 17 NV
23369 Iowa United 12-1 premier 1475 12-11 52% 12 IA
23370 awaRoots 14 1475 5-9 36% 14 HI
23371 Salty 15-S 1475 14-18 44% 15 IA
23372 Shock 15-Surge 1475 25-21 54% 15 IL
23373 Renaissance 13-Red bc 1475 6-6 50% 13 OH
23374 GSJ West 13-Purple 1475 22-23 49% 13 SC
23375 Ozark Juniors 16-Reg plus 1475 3-3 50% 16 AR
23376 Cannon Falls JO 11-3 1475 2-3 40% 11 MN
23377 307 Impact 10 1475 2-3 40% 10 WY
23378 Club Apex 15-Black 1475 25-20 56% 15 KY
23379 360 Volleyball Club 15 15 Kaos White 1475 3-4 43% 15 TX
23380 PL Extreme Volleyball 13-1 1475 13-12 52% 13 MN
23381 All In 11-Purple 1475 3-3 50% 11 IL
23382 Select 16-S 1475 1-3 25% 16 MN
23383 Elite Volleyball Clubs 13-1 1475 4-6 24% 13 KY
23384 SFVC 15-1 1475 10-11 48% 15 FL
23385 MCJO 13-S purple 1475 1-3 25% 13 MN
23386 IBV 13-Gold 1475 10-10 50% 13 IN
23387 CE Jennings 18-Ella 1475 8-5 57% 18 LA
23388 Genesis 15-Blue 1475 16-13 55% 15 TN
23389 Next Level 14-Hinahina 1475 7-8 47% 14 NV
23390 Dynasty 18-Gold 1475 20-22 48% 18 KS
23391 VC United 15-1 premier 1475 5-10 33% 15 IL
23392 Renegades 15 Adidas 1475 28-32 44% 15 TX
23393 Troy 16-Trojans 1475 1-4 20% 16
23394 Owasso Summit 16 1475 20-17 54% 16 OK
23395 TuoCo 15-S 1475 1-4 20% 15 CA
23396 Fusion 13-1 1475 9-12 43% 13 MN
23397 Ho'oikaika VBC 14-1 1475 3-3 50% 14 CA
23398 EPVA 14-Black 1475 10-9 53% 14 MN
23399 diggersz 12-Spring -liz 1475 11-10 52% 12 IL
23400 NtroIN 10-3 1475 2-2 50% 10 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.