2025-2026 Season — Page 468 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23351 | Avalanche 16-Lockwood | 1475 | 1-2 | 20% | 16 | MT |
| 23352 | Spark 16-1 juan | 1475 | 20-22 | 48% | 16 | CA |
| 23353 | CSRA Heat 14 Gold | 1475 | 17-22 | 44% | 14 | GA |
| 23354 | EVA 11-Green hayes | 1475 | 11-11 | 50% | 11 | KY |
| 23355 | Elevate 12-Green spring | 1475 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | IL |
| 23356 | Peak Elite 15 | 1475 | 27-48 | 36% | 15 | PA |
| 23357 | SPVC 13-Girls stephanie | 1475 | 3-3 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 23358 | Mass Premier 14-2 white | 1475 | 20-17 | 53% | 14 | MA |
| 23359 | Inspire CLE 10 | 1475 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | OH |
| 23360 | Millennium 14-Scheerer | 1475 | 17-18 | 49% | 14 | OH |
| 23361 | EPBGC 14 | 1475 | 7-8 | 44% | 14 | RI |
| 23362 | BVA 15-N luna | 1475 | 16-24 | 40% | 15 | FL |
| 23363 | Aspire 14-2 pink | 1475 | 21-22 | 49% | 14 | AB |
| 23364 | MAVS 816 17-1 | 1475 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | KS |
| 23365 | A'o a Koa Volleyball 12-G | 1475 | 13-17 | 43% | 12 | HI |
| 23366 | Starlings Lynwood 16-S atencio | 1475 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 23367 | Lakes 16 Maroon | 1475 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 23368 | Impact 17-Red wes | 1475 | 24-26 | 48% | 17 | NV |
| 23369 | Iowa United 12-1 premier | 1475 | 12-11 | 52% | 12 | IA |
| 23370 | awaRoots 14 | 1475 | 5-9 | 36% | 14 | HI |
| 23371 | Salty 15-S | 1475 | 14-18 | 44% | 15 | IA |
| 23372 | Shock 15-Surge | 1475 | 25-21 | 54% | 15 | IL |
| 23373 | Renaissance 13-Red bc | 1475 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | OH |
| 23374 | GSJ West 13-Purple | 1475 | 22-23 | 49% | 13 | SC |
| 23375 | Ozark Juniors 16-Reg plus | 1475 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | AR |
| 23376 | Cannon Falls JO 11-3 | 1475 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | MN |
| 23377 | 307 Impact 10 | 1475 | 2-3 | 40% | 10 | WY |
| 23378 | Club Apex 15-Black | 1475 | 25-20 | 56% | 15 | KY |
| 23379 | 360 Volleyball Club 15 15 Kaos White | 1475 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | TX |
| 23380 | PL Extreme Volleyball 13-1 | 1475 | 13-12 | 52% | 13 | MN |
| 23381 | All In 11-Purple | 1475 | 3-3 | 50% | 11 | IL |
| 23382 | Select 16-S | 1475 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | MN |
| 23383 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 13-1 | 1475 | 4-6 | 24% | 13 | KY |
| 23384 | SFVC 15-1 | 1475 | 10-11 | 48% | 15 | FL |
| 23385 | MCJO 13-S purple | 1475 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | MN |
| 23386 | IBV 13-Gold | 1475 | 10-10 | 50% | 13 | IN |
| 23387 | CE Jennings 18-Ella | 1475 | 8-5 | 57% | 18 | LA |
| 23388 | Genesis 15-Blue | 1475 | 16-13 | 55% | 15 | TN |
| 23389 | Next Level 14-Hinahina | 1475 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | NV |
| 23390 | Dynasty 18-Gold | 1475 | 20-22 | 48% | 18 | KS |
| 23391 | VC United 15-1 premier | 1475 | 5-10 | 33% | 15 | IL |
| 23392 | Renegades 15 Adidas | 1475 | 28-32 | 44% | 15 | TX |
| 23393 | Troy 16-Trojans | 1475 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | |
| 23394 | Owasso Summit 16 | 1475 | 20-17 | 54% | 16 | OK |
| 23395 | TuoCo 15-S | 1475 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | CA |
| 23396 | Fusion 13-1 | 1475 | 9-12 | 43% | 13 | MN |
| 23397 | Ho'oikaika VBC 14-1 | 1475 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 23398 | EPVA 14-Black | 1475 | 10-9 | 53% | 14 | MN |
| 23399 | diggersz 12-Spring -liz | 1475 | 11-10 | 52% | 12 | IL |
| 23400 | NtroIN 10-3 | 1475 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.