Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 467 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23301 Hunter's 14-Red c. tony 1476 2-2 50% 14 FL
23302 Tierrasanta 14-Lana 1476 4-3 57% 14 CA
23303 Central VBC 14-1 1476 3-4 43% 14 NV
23304 TAV Houston 14-Grey 1476 17-14 55% 14 TX
23305 CTX Juniors 14 Silver 1476 15-15 50% 14 TX
23306 TVA Smack 12-Premier 1476 2-3 40% 12 CA
23307 OVA 12-Premier dani v 1476 2-3 40% 12 CA
23308 EVO VBC 18-1 1476 4-3 57% 18 NV
23309 Krush VBC 14 National 1476 24-26 48% 14 MI
23310 Pulse 14-G1 1476 4-6 40% 14 CA
23311 Hammerin' Hawks 12-S 1476 2-3 40% 12 IA
23312 Platform 12-Navy 1476 10-14 36% 12 IA
23313 Grit 16 1476 2-1 50% 16 AL
23314 HardRock 14 1476 38-29 56% 14 NH
23315 TX LEGACY 12 TEXAS 1476 11-9 46% 12 TX
23316 CYVBC Surge 17-Blue 1476 16-25 39% 17 OH
23317 Shockwave Volleyball Club 14 14U SWVC Blue 1476 11-12 46% 14
23318 SI Wave 15-Red 1476 16-13 55% 15 MO
23319 PR Select 18 1476 6-5 55% 18 PR
23320 MVA 16-Blue 1476 6-4 60% 16 MI
23321 316VBC 18-2 1476 6-5 55% 18 KS
23322 ITVC 12-1 1476 3-4 43% 12 WA
23323 United 17-Black 1476 13-22 37% 17 AL
23324 1:27 Sports 13-Fire 1476 18-16 53% 13 SC
23325 Xplosion 17-A - chadrick 1476 10-6 63% 17 OH
23326 Ridgeland Reds 16-Red 1476 3-5 38% 16 MN
23327 Crosscourt 15-Black 1476 15-14 52% 15 PA
23328 LAVA West 17-Molten sc 1476 8-19 30% 17 CA
23329 TAMPA UNITED VBA 13-Red 1476 31-29 52% 13 FL
23330 HP South 10 Premier 1476 12-19 38% 10 MO
23331 CinciVB Acad 11-Henderson 1476 5-6 45% 11 OH
23332 Conquest 17-1 1476 1-3 25% 17 NJ
23333 319 United 18-Shannon 1476 1-2 25% 18 IA
23334 Prime Time 15-Orange 1476 22-24 48% 15 IL
23335 GRV 14-Black 1476 11-35 24% 14 IN
23336 Marshall JO 10-Black 1476 3-6 23% 10 MN
23337 Show 16-Hammond 1476 15-13 54% 16 ID
23338 Flying Squirrels 14 1475 12-9 57% 14 TX
23339 VC United 13 VC United SP132 Regional (GL) 1475 1-2 25% 13 IL
23340 208 14-Red 1475 8-8 50% 14 ID
23341 Shockwaves 12-1 1475 11-11 39% 12 MT
23342 Eclipse VBC 17-Orange 1475 17-15 53% 17 WY
23343 Horseshoe VBC 12-Red 1475 10-10 48% 12 PA
23344 Mason Dixon Volleyball Club 15 15U Kelly (CH) 1475 20-16 51% 15
23345 RRIV 13-Winter 1475 3-6 23% 13 ND
23346 Foothills 15-Teal 1475 23-28 45% 15 WA
23347 630 Volleyball 18-1 1475 14-5 74% 18 IL
23348 MHE 16-Green 1475 5-5 50% 16 ND
23349 InnovativeVC 15-2cantres 1475 6-5 55% 15 PR
23350 TEVA 12-1 1475 8-6 57% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.