2025-2026 Season — Page 467 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23301 | Hunter's 14-Red c. tony | 1476 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 23302 | Tierrasanta 14-Lana | 1476 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 23303 | Central VBC 14-1 | 1476 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | NV |
| 23304 | TAV Houston 14-Grey | 1476 | 17-14 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 23305 | CTX Juniors 14 Silver | 1476 | 15-15 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 23306 | TVA Smack 12-Premier | 1476 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 23307 | OVA 12-Premier dani v | 1476 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 23308 | EVO VBC 18-1 | 1476 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | NV |
| 23309 | Krush VBC 14 National | 1476 | 24-26 | 48% | 14 | MI |
| 23310 | Pulse 14-G1 | 1476 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 23311 | Hammerin' Hawks 12-S | 1476 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | IA |
| 23312 | Platform 12-Navy | 1476 | 10-14 | 36% | 12 | IA |
| 23313 | Grit 16 | 1476 | 2-1 | 50% | 16 | AL |
| 23314 | HardRock 14 | 1476 | 38-29 | 56% | 14 | NH |
| 23315 | TX LEGACY 12 TEXAS | 1476 | 11-9 | 46% | 12 | TX |
| 23316 | CYVBC Surge 17-Blue | 1476 | 16-25 | 39% | 17 | OH |
| 23317 | Shockwave Volleyball Club 14 14U SWVC Blue | 1476 | 11-12 | 46% | 14 | |
| 23318 | SI Wave 15-Red | 1476 | 16-13 | 55% | 15 | MO |
| 23319 | PR Select 18 | 1476 | 6-5 | 55% | 18 | PR |
| 23320 | MVA 16-Blue | 1476 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | MI |
| 23321 | 316VBC 18-2 | 1476 | 6-5 | 55% | 18 | KS |
| 23322 | ITVC 12-1 | 1476 | 3-4 | 43% | 12 | WA |
| 23323 | United 17-Black | 1476 | 13-22 | 37% | 17 | AL |
| 23324 | 1:27 Sports 13-Fire | 1476 | 18-16 | 53% | 13 | SC |
| 23325 | Xplosion 17-A - chadrick | 1476 | 10-6 | 63% | 17 | OH |
| 23326 | Ridgeland Reds 16-Red | 1476 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | MN |
| 23327 | Crosscourt 15-Black | 1476 | 15-14 | 52% | 15 | PA |
| 23328 | LAVA West 17-Molten sc | 1476 | 8-19 | 30% | 17 | CA |
| 23329 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 13-Red | 1476 | 31-29 | 52% | 13 | FL |
| 23330 | HP South 10 Premier | 1476 | 12-19 | 38% | 10 | MO |
| 23331 | CinciVB Acad 11-Henderson | 1476 | 5-6 | 45% | 11 | OH |
| 23332 | Conquest 17-1 | 1476 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | NJ |
| 23333 | 319 United 18-Shannon | 1476 | 1-2 | 25% | 18 | IA |
| 23334 | Prime Time 15-Orange | 1476 | 22-24 | 48% | 15 | IL |
| 23335 | GRV 14-Black | 1476 | 11-35 | 24% | 14 | IN |
| 23336 | Marshall JO 10-Black | 1476 | 3-6 | 23% | 10 | MN |
| 23337 | Show 16-Hammond | 1476 | 15-13 | 54% | 16 | ID |
| 23338 | Flying Squirrels 14 | 1475 | 12-9 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 23339 | VC United 13 VC United SP132 Regional (GL) | 1475 | 1-2 | 25% | 13 | IL |
| 23340 | 208 14-Red | 1475 | 8-8 | 50% | 14 | ID |
| 23341 | Shockwaves 12-1 | 1475 | 11-11 | 39% | 12 | MT |
| 23342 | Eclipse VBC 17-Orange | 1475 | 17-15 | 53% | 17 | WY |
| 23343 | Horseshoe VBC 12-Red | 1475 | 10-10 | 48% | 12 | PA |
| 23344 | Mason Dixon Volleyball Club 15 15U Kelly (CH) | 1475 | 20-16 | 51% | 15 | |
| 23345 | RRIV 13-Winter | 1475 | 3-6 | 23% | 13 | ND |
| 23346 | Foothills 15-Teal | 1475 | 23-28 | 45% | 15 | WA |
| 23347 | 630 Volleyball 18-1 | 1475 | 14-5 | 74% | 18 | IL |
| 23348 | MHE 16-Green | 1475 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | ND |
| 23349 | InnovativeVC 15-2cantres | 1475 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | PR |
| 23350 | TEVA 12-1 | 1475 | 8-6 | 57% | 12 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.