Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 469 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23401 Zona VBC 15-R3 1475 13-10 57% 15 AZ
23402 757 14-R khai 1475 20-15 57% 14 VA
23403 Inspire 13-Purple 1475 12-8 55% 13 LA
23404 FTL 13-Nuclear e 1475 17-15 53% 13 FL
23405 ARAA 12-Ydt white 1475 2-2 50% 12 MN
23406 Nebraska Volleyball Academy 17 CVC 17/18's (GP) 1475 2-2 50% 17 NE
23407 Normal Flight 12-2 1475 11-10 52% 12 IL
23408 WBVBC 18-Roy 1475 17-23 43% 18 OH
23409 Sky High 14-Giustino 1475 4-5 44% 14 IL
23410 KVA 16-Kawika 1475 16-18 47% 16 HI
23411 AVCA 10 1475 5-4 56% 10
23412 HPVBC Blue Heat 12U 1475 33-40 45% 12 TX
23413 Waterloo Tigers 16 Tigers Pink 1475 4-2 67% 16 ON
23414 West Edge 15 Dawn 1475 34-21 62% 15 CA
23415 Zion Sports Academy 15 ZSA Unite (GE) (2) 1475 3-2 60% 15 NJ
23416 LTVC 15-1 1475 3-2 60% 15 NV
23417 Black Hills Juniors NH 13-2 1475 3-1 60% 13 WY
23418 Apex NW 15-Vertex 1475 22-15 59% 15 WA
23419 Club Unite 14-Lw gold 1475 19-14 58% 14 TN
23420 SIVBA 14-Turquoise 1475 5-4 56% 14 MO
23421 Fresno Heat HEAT 14-Travel kevin 1475 19-15 56% 14 CA
23422 Guns Up VBC 14-Red 1475 23-19 55% 14 TX
23423 Crossfire 16-Mercury 1475 11-9 55% 16 MN
23424 CRVB 14-2 1475 14-12 52% 14 TN
23425 C1VB In-house MS 13-Jauhna 1475 2-3 40% 13 SC
23426 LPV 13 1475 4-6 40% 13 PR
23427 HVA 12-Blue 1475 12-11 43% 12 TX
23428 805 Elite 12-National 1475 3-4 43% 12 CA
23429 FR Premier Jrs 17 Force 1475 24-21 50% 17 TX
23430 SoCal VBC 17-Grandview 1475 13-13 50% 17 CA
23431 Eastview Lightning 13-2 1475 21-22 49% 13 MN
23432 NVA 10-Futuro adriana 1475 22-25 47% 10 FL
23433 Xcel 18-Elite russell 1475 17-20 46% 18 NC
23434 Southern Elite 13-Elite 1475 13-15 46% 13 LA
23435 BCVC 14-2 smack 1475 6-7 46% 14 CA
23436 Wave 14 Tsunami (OK) 1475 24-26 46% 14 OK
23437 Envision 14-Black 1475 3-4 43% 14 NV
23438 Iowa Elite 18-Ice 1475 19-24 42% 18 IA
23439 Club Four 16-Select 1475 11-14 42% 16 MO
23440 FC Elite 17 Adidas 1475 10-13 42% 17 WI
23441 AJV 11 Navy 1475 14-20 41% 11 TX
23442 Aces 18-Gold 1475 5-4 33% 18 UT
23443 Crossroads 11-White 1475 4-6 33% 11 TX
23444 Hawks VBC 13-2 1475 1-2 33% 13 OH
23445 Club Tonka 12-1 1475 9-9 50% 12 MN
23446 LAVA 12-1 1475 5-5 50% 12 OH
23447 PNW VBC 16-3 white 1474 14-11 56% 16 OR
23448 Windthorst Aggressors 12 1474 0-2 0% 12
23449 Dayton Jrs 15-White 1474 5-5 50% 15 OH
23450 Impact 12-Elite 1474 3-3 50% 12 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.