2025-2026 Season — Page 469 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23401 | Zona VBC 15-R3 | 1475 | 13-10 | 57% | 15 | AZ |
| 23402 | 757 14-R khai | 1475 | 20-15 | 57% | 14 | VA |
| 23403 | Inspire 13-Purple | 1475 | 12-8 | 55% | 13 | LA |
| 23404 | FTL 13-Nuclear e | 1475 | 17-15 | 53% | 13 | FL |
| 23405 | ARAA 12-Ydt white | 1475 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 23406 | Nebraska Volleyball Academy 17 CVC 17/18's (GP) | 1475 | 2-2 | 50% | 17 | NE |
| 23407 | Normal Flight 12-2 | 1475 | 11-10 | 52% | 12 | IL |
| 23408 | WBVBC 18-Roy | 1475 | 17-23 | 43% | 18 | OH |
| 23409 | Sky High 14-Giustino | 1475 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | IL |
| 23410 | KVA 16-Kawika | 1475 | 16-18 | 47% | 16 | HI |
| 23411 | AVCA 10 | 1475 | 5-4 | 56% | 10 | |
| 23412 | HPVBC Blue Heat 12U | 1475 | 33-40 | 45% | 12 | TX |
| 23413 | Waterloo Tigers 16 Tigers Pink | 1475 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | ON |
| 23414 | West Edge 15 Dawn | 1475 | 34-21 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 23415 | Zion Sports Academy 15 ZSA Unite (GE) (2) | 1475 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | NJ |
| 23416 | LTVC 15-1 | 1475 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | NV |
| 23417 | Black Hills Juniors NH 13-2 | 1475 | 3-1 | 60% | 13 | WY |
| 23418 | Apex NW 15-Vertex | 1475 | 22-15 | 59% | 15 | WA |
| 23419 | Club Unite 14-Lw gold | 1475 | 19-14 | 58% | 14 | TN |
| 23420 | SIVBA 14-Turquoise | 1475 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | MO |
| 23421 | Fresno Heat HEAT 14-Travel kevin | 1475 | 19-15 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 23422 | Guns Up VBC 14-Red | 1475 | 23-19 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 23423 | Crossfire 16-Mercury | 1475 | 11-9 | 55% | 16 | MN |
| 23424 | CRVB 14-2 | 1475 | 14-12 | 52% | 14 | TN |
| 23425 | C1VB In-house MS 13-Jauhna | 1475 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | SC |
| 23426 | LPV 13 | 1475 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | PR |
| 23427 | HVA 12-Blue | 1475 | 12-11 | 43% | 12 | TX |
| 23428 | 805 Elite 12-National | 1475 | 3-4 | 43% | 12 | CA |
| 23429 | FR Premier Jrs 17 Force | 1475 | 24-21 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 23430 | SoCal VBC 17-Grandview | 1475 | 13-13 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 23431 | Eastview Lightning 13-2 | 1475 | 21-22 | 49% | 13 | MN |
| 23432 | NVA 10-Futuro adriana | 1475 | 22-25 | 47% | 10 | FL |
| 23433 | Xcel 18-Elite russell | 1475 | 17-20 | 46% | 18 | NC |
| 23434 | Southern Elite 13-Elite | 1475 | 13-15 | 46% | 13 | LA |
| 23435 | BCVC 14-2 smack | 1475 | 6-7 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 23436 | Wave 14 Tsunami (OK) | 1475 | 24-26 | 46% | 14 | OK |
| 23437 | Envision 14-Black | 1475 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | NV |
| 23438 | Iowa Elite 18-Ice | 1475 | 19-24 | 42% | 18 | IA |
| 23439 | Club Four 16-Select | 1475 | 11-14 | 42% | 16 | MO |
| 23440 | FC Elite 17 Adidas | 1475 | 10-13 | 42% | 17 | WI |
| 23441 | AJV 11 Navy | 1475 | 14-20 | 41% | 11 | TX |
| 23442 | Aces 18-Gold | 1475 | 5-4 | 33% | 18 | UT |
| 23443 | Crossroads 11-White | 1475 | 4-6 | 33% | 11 | TX |
| 23444 | Hawks VBC 13-2 | 1475 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | OH |
| 23445 | Club Tonka 12-1 | 1475 | 9-9 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 23446 | LAVA 12-1 | 1475 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | OH |
| 23447 | PNW VBC 16-3 white | 1474 | 14-11 | 56% | 16 | OR |
| 23448 | Windthorst Aggressors 12 | 1474 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | |
| 23449 | Dayton Jrs 15-White | 1474 | 5-5 | 50% | 15 | OH |
| 23450 | Impact 12-Elite | 1474 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.