Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 470 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23451 Decatur Force 17 Teal 1474 24-24 50% 17 IN
23452 OTS 13-1 purple coach nelson 1474 3-3 50% 13 TN
23453 Alpha Omega 18-Elite 1474 11-11 50% 18 MO
23454 Renegade Volleyball Club 15 Renegade Red (NO) 1474 3-3 50% 15 MN
23455 Legacy 15-Westfall 1474 2-2 50% 15 OH
23456 GSL JO VB 14-1 1474 1-1 50% 14 MN
23457 Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 15-1 1474 16-15 52% 15 SC
23458 Mavericks 17-Elite 1474 15-12 56% 17 MI
23459 BOSS VBC 14-Pink 1474 42-33 56% 14 WI
23460 Force 14-1 1474 5-4 56% 14 MS
23461 Portland VBC 11-1 navy 1474 9-7 56% 11 OR
23462 MVP 17-Gold 1474 3-2 60% 17 OH
23463 Top Flight 13-Psi sp 1474 6-4 60% 13 IL
23464 BBE Blaze 16-S 1474 2-3 40% 16 MN
23465 JM10 | 14-1 1474 25-17 60% 14 FL
23466 Slam VBC 15-1 1474 3-2 60% 15 MN
23467 2026 Nola Kate 10 1474 26-30 45% 10 LA
23468 Hollywood 13-2 inspire american 1474 2-2 50% 13 OH
23469 RVC318 15-R 1474 8-8 42% 15
23470 MOVSelect 13-Black 1474 2-2 50% 13 OH
23471 eteva 14-2 1474 2-3 40% 14
23472 Panhandle Powerhouse 14-Kelly 1474 5-6 45% 14 NE
23473 OCJ 12-1blue 1474 13-8 62% 12 OR
23474 Lawrence Landsharks 18-1 1474 3-4 30% 18 KS
23475 New WAVE 15 Storm 1474 15-11 58% 15 IL
23476 AJAXVB 14-1 gold 1474 2-3 40% 14 OR
23477 Club 217 13-Ashton 1474 12-9 57% 13 IL
23478 Hi-Line Hit 16 1474 8-8 44% 16 MT
23479 Red Storm 12 Regional 1474 10-11 45% 12 LA
23480 Volleylab 17-Kali 1474 9-11 41% 17 TX
23481 Jackson Elite 14 1474 3-2 43% 14 ID
23482 Independent 14-Delaney 1474 2-3 40% 14 IN
23483 Sharks 13 Navy 1474 30-37 45% 13 AL
23484 Madtown 12-1 select 1474 18-24 43% 12 WI
23485 MCV 17-Carson 1474 8-6 57% 17 NC
23486 JVBC 13-National 1474 6-7 46% 13 IA
23487 Club V South 18 Chrissie 1474 25-25 48% 18 UT
23488 Shockwave VBC 15 1474 15-21 42% 15 KS
23489 SOL 10-1 1474 6-6 50% 10 TX
23490 FL Conquer 11-Local orange 1474 13-12 52% 11 FL
23491 Apex VBTC 16-Apex white 1474 27-27 50% 16 OH
23492 STVA 10-1 natalie 1474 22-21 45% 10 TX
23493 Prime 12-Nate 1474 22-22 50% 12 CO
23494 SMASH 12-Volts 1474 19-16 54% 12 MA
23495 New WAVE 14-Cyclones 1474 7-5 58% 14 IL
23496 AVA 14-N richardson 1474 20-27 43% 14 OH
23497 Alpha Omega Volleyball 14-1 1474 2-2 40% 14 MO
23498 Legends 14-4 angel 1474 3-3 50% 14 PR
23499 Victory 15-White 1474 15-14 47% 15 TX
23500 Integrity Elite 12-Black 1474 8-12 40% 12 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.