2025-2026 Season — Page 449 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22401 | Hollywood Inspire Regional 17-4 | 1484 | 3-3 | 50% | 17 | OH |
| 22402 | Synergy 17-Larue | 1484 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | OH |
| 22403 | PVC 16-2 | 1484 | 21-17 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 22404 | Miami Hype 16-Power1 | 1484 | 32-43 | 43% | 16 | FL |
| 22405 | Club One AZ 12-Platinum | 1484 | 23-35 | 40% | 12 | AZ |
| 22406 | LAVA 16-Dan | 1484 | 10-11 | 48% | 16 | NC |
| 22407 | VC Denver 18-Black | 1484 | 12-14 | 46% | 18 | CO |
| 22408 | ITVC (HI) 13 S | 1484 | 4-3 | 57% | 13 | NV |
| 22409 | Central VBC 13-1 | 1484 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | NV |
| 22410 | Jr Trojans 13-White | 1484 | 12-12 | 50% | 13 | IN |
| 22411 | ICE 14-Regional b | 1484 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | WA |
| 22412 | MARIN 18-Black | 1484 | 26-21 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 22413 | BOLTS 15-Black | 1484 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | IA |
| 22414 | Cayuga Lakers 15 | 1484 | 1-1 | 20% | 15 | NY |
| 22415 | KC Power 15-6 | 1484 | 2-3 | 20% | 15 | KS |
| 22416 | Trojan 14-2 | 1484 | 2-2 | 40% | 14 | MN |
| 22417 | Mizuno M1 14-3 | 1484 | 31-39 | 44% | 14 | MN |
| 22418 | Ortonville 14-S | 1484 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 22419 | Lake Erie Crush 15 Lake Erie Crush-15U | 1484 | 6-4 | 55% | 15 | |
| 22420 | VOLT 13-Charge | 1484 | 6-9 | 38% | 13 | ND |
| 22421 | Storm 14 Elite | 1484 | 25-24 | 50% | 14 | AR |
| 22422 | Riverside Warriors Volleyball Club 14 Riverside Volleyball Club- Gold (GW) | 1484 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | |
| 22423 | BCS Skyline H 15-White | 1484 | 9-13 | 36% | 15 | TX |
| 22424 | SLPVC 15-1 | 1484 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | IN |
| 22425 | Hoosier Elite Ducks 15-1 | 1484 | 32-50 | 39% | 15 | IN |
| 22426 | NOH 14-Blue | 1484 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 22427 | MVA 14-Navy | 1484 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 22428 | Blue Crush 14-Hess | 1484 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | OH |
| 22429 | Attack G16 | 1484 | 20-23 | 42% | 16 | MO |
| 22430 | 417 MoJrs 13-Reg white | 1484 | 7-7 | 44% | 13 | MO |
| 22431 | Atomic! 13 Ellie | 1484 | 3-3 | 33% | 13 | MI |
| 22432 | Desert Sports 14-Elite | 1484 | 9-5 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 22433 | Legend 14-Blue | 1484 | 6-4 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 22434 | HEAT 14-Valley kim | 1484 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 22435 | Storm 14-Greg & sean | 1484 | 24-18 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 22436 | Rise 14-Kris | 1484 | 7-11 | 39% | 14 | CA |
| 22437 | FIRST TRIUMPH 17-1 | 1484 | 7-8 | 41% | 17 | TX |
| 22438 | MVA 16 | 1484 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | OH |
| 22439 | Club GSL 12-Comp - allie | 1484 | 10-10 | 38% | 12 | UT |
| 22440 | Fox Valley Performance 12 FVP Pirates | 1484 | 9-9 | 50% | 12 | WI |
| 22441 | 417 MoJrs 17-Nat black | 1483 | 18-15 | 51% | 17 | MO |
| 22442 | Beach South 14-2 | 1483 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | GA |
| 22443 | TSVBC 13 | 1483 | 12-10 | 55% | 13 | CA |
| 22444 | Surfside 13-Mb legends | 1483 | 23-23 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 22445 | 516 Elite Volleyball 14-White | 1483 | 14-14 | 50% | 14 | NY |
| 22446 | EVC 14-Black | 1483 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 22447 | HEVBA 15-99 | 1483 | 27-18 | 59% | 15 | MA |
| 22448 | Victorium 15 UA | 1483 | 14-32 | 30% | 15 | AZ |
| 22449 | SC Slam 15-Red | 1483 | 1-3 | 20% | 15 | MN |
| 22450 | HRVC 15-National black | 1483 | 20-18 | 53% | 15 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.