Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 449 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22401 Hollywood Inspire Regional 17-4 1484 3-3 50% 17 OH
22402 Synergy 17-Larue 1484 2-3 40% 17 OH
22403 PVC 16-2 1484 21-17 55% 16 FL
22404 Miami Hype 16-Power1 1484 32-43 43% 16 FL
22405 Club One AZ 12-Platinum 1484 23-35 40% 12 AZ
22406 LAVA 16-Dan 1484 10-11 48% 16 NC
22407 VC Denver 18-Black 1484 12-14 46% 18 CO
22408 ITVC (HI) 13 S 1484 4-3 57% 13 NV
22409 Central VBC 13-1 1484 4-4 50% 13 NV
22410 Jr Trojans 13-White 1484 12-12 50% 13 IN
22411 ICE 14-Regional b 1484 3-1 75% 14 WA
22412 MARIN 18-Black 1484 26-21 55% 18 CA
22413 BOLTS 15-Black 1484 2-3 40% 15 IA
22414 Cayuga Lakers 15 1484 1-1 20% 15 NY
22415 KC Power 15-6 1484 2-3 20% 15 KS
22416 Trojan 14-2 1484 2-2 40% 14 MN
22417 Mizuno M1 14-3 1484 31-39 44% 14 MN
22418 Ortonville 14-S 1484 2-2 50% 14 MN
22419 Lake Erie Crush 15 Lake Erie Crush-15U 1484 6-4 55% 15
22420 VOLT 13-Charge 1484 6-9 38% 13 ND
22421 Storm 14 Elite 1484 25-24 50% 14 AR
22422 Riverside Warriors Volleyball Club 14 Riverside Volleyball Club- Gold (GW) 1484 10-11 48% 14
22423 BCS Skyline H 15-White 1484 9-13 36% 15 TX
22424 SLPVC 15-1 1484 3-2 60% 15 IN
22425 Hoosier Elite Ducks 15-1 1484 32-50 39% 15 IN
22426 NOH 14-Blue 1484 9-6 60% 14 OH
22427 MVA 14-Navy 1484 6-4 60% 14 OH
22428 Blue Crush 14-Hess 1484 2-4 33% 14 OH
22429 Attack G16 1484 20-23 42% 16 MO
22430 417 MoJrs 13-Reg white 1484 7-7 44% 13 MO
22431 Atomic! 13 Ellie 1484 3-3 33% 13 MI
22432 Desert Sports 14-Elite 1484 9-5 64% 14 CA
22433 Legend 14-Blue 1484 6-4 50% 14 CA
22434 HEAT 14-Valley kim 1484 2-3 40% 14 CA
22435 Storm 14-Greg & sean 1484 24-18 57% 14 CA
22436 Rise 14-Kris 1484 7-11 39% 14 CA
22437 FIRST TRIUMPH 17-1 1484 7-8 41% 17 TX
22438 MVA 16 1484 6-4 60% 16 OH
22439 Club GSL 12-Comp - allie 1484 10-10 38% 12 UT
22440 Fox Valley Performance 12 FVP Pirates 1484 9-9 50% 12 WI
22441 417 MoJrs 17-Nat black 1483 18-15 51% 17 MO
22442 Beach South 14-2 1483 3-5 38% 14 GA
22443 TSVBC 13 1483 12-10 55% 13 CA
22444 Surfside 13-Mb legends 1483 23-23 50% 13 CA
22445 516 Elite Volleyball 14-White 1483 14-14 50% 14 NY
22446 EVC 14-Black 1483 5-4 56% 14 CA
22447 HEVBA 15-99 1483 27-18 59% 15 MA
22448 Victorium 15 UA 1483 14-32 30% 15 AZ
22449 SC Slam 15-Red 1483 1-3 20% 15 MN
22450 HRVC 15-National black 1483 20-18 53% 15 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.