Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 450 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22451 North Point 14-Regional 1483 12-10 48% 14 TX
22452 Roughriders 14-1 1483 3-4 43% 14 MA
22453 PCVC 11-Nalu 1483 15-19 44% 11 CA
22454 CGSV 13-Brooks 1483 3-2 60% 13 OH
22455 FH 16-2 alaka'i fred 1483 22-16 51% 16 TX
22456 Synergy 13-Abbott 1483 2-2 50% 13 OH
22457 Endless VBC 14-Maroon 1483 3-4 43% 14 TX
22458 SAVAGES VC 16 1483 25-22 52% 16 TX
22459 AP 16-Wilco yellow 1483 25-24 51% 16 TX
22460 CLBRK 16-1 1483 7-7 50% 16 WI
22461 WI Juniors 16-National 1483 42-33 56% 16 WI
22462 The Edge 16 Silver (GL) 1483 24-13 65% 16 IL
22463 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 16-National grey 1483 11-20 35% 16 NV
22464 3DGE 14-1 gold 1483 5-50 9% 14 PA
22465 EXCEL 13-Gold 1483 3-4 43% 13 TX
22466 Dallas Premier 13-Crimson 1483 3-4 43% 13 TX
22467 central tigers 13-1 1483 2-3 40% 13 IN
22468 BCVC 12-Carolina 1483 7-5 58% 12 CA
22469 ARVC 17-Red adidas 1483 18-21 46% 17 NM
22470 Galaxy Volleyball club 15-1 1483 8-12 36% 15 KS
22471 Orange Crush 14-S 1483 2-2 50% 14 IA
22472 Watertown 14-Red 1483 1-2 33% 14 MN
22473 Falcon Fever 14 1483 5-3 63% 14 MN
22474 HPRIME 11-Blue 1483 1-1 33% 11 TX
22475 G & G Volleyball 13-1 1483 14-17 45% 13 NJ
22476 JVVC 14-Navy 1483 8-7 53% 14 MI
22477 Revival - Range 14 1483 20-22 48% 14 MN
22478 Voltage Volleyball BP 14 1483 3-2 60% 14 MN
22479 Laulima 15-Blue 1483 22-16 54% 15 UT
22480 RTR JO VB 10-2 1483 1-1 25% 10 SD
22481 Nebraska ONE 13-Lightning 1483 13-17 43% 13 NE
22482 RRIV 13-Spring 1483 10-9 48% 13 ND
22483 Club 217 11-Practice team 1483 3-2 60% 11 IL
22484 Big Game Volleyball 12 Big Game Volleyball (GW) 1483 3-3 38% 12
22485 Notorious DIG 14 Notorious DIG 1483 27-18 53% 14 NV
22486 BVA WB 17-Navy alex 1483 11-9 55% 17 KY
22487 HRVC 14-American black 1483 9-15 38% 14 NC
22488 BAVC 14-1 elizabeth 1483 2-6 25% 14 NV
22489 Rival 13-Regional black 1483 16-12 57% 13 FL
22490 AYOSA 16-Royal 1483 6-4 60% 16 CO
22491 Momentum Volleyball 16-Elsa/jamisyn 1483 18-19 49% 16 CO
22492 QCA 14-White 1483 10-8 56% 14 MS
22493 Vision 15-1 1483 21-24 47% 15 TX
22494 DYNASTY 11 Adidas 1483 4-3 57% 11 KS
22495 SOUTHWEST 16-Black 1483 8-8 50% 16 MI
22496 T4VBC 15 Premier 1483 22-26 46% 15 TX
22497 Maceteras Volleyball Club 12 12 Blue Carlos 1483 4-2 67% 12 PR
22498 Pioneer VBC 18-1 1483 4-7 36% 18 OH
22499 RCVS 14-1 perla 1483 8-4 67% 14 PR
22500 APV 17-National royal 1483 8-16 31% 17 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.